Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Google Container Engine comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Container Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4, while Google is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Google’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Read 50 Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

890 Views
617 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Google Container Engine

Read 1 Google Container Engine review

96 Views
49 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Google Container Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Container Management

7th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Container Engine

Ranking in Container Management

18th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 1.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Container Engine is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads

Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.

Read full review

Hoang Do

DevOps Engineer at The Digital Group Inc

Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs

We use the solution to deploy microservices. The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs. Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products. I have been using the product for two years. I rate the product's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable."

"For Amazon EC2 Container Service, providing the ability for users to select specific processor, memory, disk, and interface types might be an ideal feature. But, the practicality of offering all possible physical combinations is nearly impossible due to the underlying physical machines. AWS and Azure organize options into groups based on essential components like powerful processors or critical interfaces, considering physical restrictions. While expanding these choices is conceivable, it may not be feasible from a financial and practical perspective. Customers generally comprehend this limitation, as even in their own data centers, exact physical machine requirements are often a result of a combination of factors such as price, availability, and new machine generations."

"ECS is a useful platform."

"The solution has good performance."

"We primarily employ the Linux platform in terms of architecture. It utilizes its database, MySQL. Additionally, for CI/CD processes, we rely on Amazon CodeBuild. Furthermore, we use Amazon S3 storage to store specific static files. Currently, the system is running smoothly, and we don't actively perform any maintenance tasks as everything is automated."

"It has helped our organization greatly and especially on weekends because we have many transactions as our users are buying some kind of tools and paying online."

"Amazon ECS allows users to deploy and manage container applications like microservices or web applications on Amazon clusters. It's easy to install and designed for AWS targets, serving as a serverless container platform. It offers features such as automatic scanning, load balancing, and service discovery to help users manage their container applications."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pros

"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."

Cons

"The tool initially required a significant amount of development time on the backend, but in terms of efficiency, it's a one-time effort."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service's security can be improved."

"I would like the product to improve integration with different platforms."

"Visualization is an important factor for me, and I don't think that the visuals within ECS are good enough because it doesn't show you all the details you might need to see at a glance."

"The solution is expensive compared to other alternatives like Azure."

"The solution's user experience and management are really bad."

"We noticed a problem where our container doesn't always run, and the traffic in our secured license exceeds 100%, leading to increased container costs. We are working to understand and reduce this traffic to control costs."

"Sometimes, the instances fail under the ECS container cluster, and we have to manually go and find out the black sheep in the ECS container instance. We had an issue earlier where one of the instances under the ECS container cluster went down, and we were not able to identify that instance. The instance got terminated, but a new instance did not come up. Therefore, I had to manually get that instance up. It could be optimized better. In production, we normally cannot sustain such things. It can be optimized in terms of instances, durability, and serving the requests of customers."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service cons

"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want to scale without the traditional methods, the solution is a bit cost-effective."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service's price is good."

"Although AWS has successfully captured over 60 percent of the market in the cloud part, the tool is competitively way cheaper for the resources it provides compared to the other solutions."

"If you increase the sizes, you incur costs to your accounts."

"I don't exactly deal with the pricing. We have a separate Infra team that deals with the pricing. They are more into the scalability part. Based on our requirements, the pricing will increase. The automation teams will test some of the benefits to see how can we can optimize the cost. They'll have a security manager connection and some alerts based upon the usage to see how to reduce the building cost based upon the installations."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price, I rate Amazon EC2 Container Service’s pricing a four or five out of ten."

"Amazon ECS is expensive."

"The tool's cost is good."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is medium."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Container Engine?

The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Container Engine?

The tool's pricing is medium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Container Engine?

Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 64% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 14% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Elastic Container Service

May 2025

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

April 2025

Download Google Container Engine product report

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Container Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Container Engine schedules your containers into the cluster and manages them automatically based on requirements you define (such as CPU and memory). It's built on the open source Kubernetes system, giving you the flexibility to take advantage of on-premises, hybrid, or public cloud infrastructure.

Google

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Tock

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors and best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.