

ScienceLogic and Amazon CloudWatch are monitoring solutions in network visibility and application performance, with each excelling in specific areas. ScienceLogic appears to have an upper hand in customization and multi-tenancy, while Amazon CloudWatch offers superior integration within the AWS ecosystem.
Features: ScienceLogic provides a highly customizable platform with flexible integration across networks and systems. Its multi-tenant environment is ideal for managing multiple customer networks with granular permissions. Built-in monitoring templates enhance its capabilities for diverse client needs. Amazon CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with AWS, providing real-time infrastructure monitoring and detailed metrics. As part of the AWS ecosystem, it offers valuable dashboards and analytics for users operating within AWS.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve its knowledge base and user interface. Its setup complexity, reporting limitations, and occasional bugs detract from usability. Expanding its API and offering a more intuitive design are growth areas. Amazon CloudWatch needs improvement in dashboard visualization and integration with third-party tools. Pricing complexity and adding a more robust application performance monitoring feature are also suggested enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, offering excellent customer service noted for responsiveness. Amazon CloudWatch is favored for public cloud deployment due to its native AWS service status. However, it may be challenging for users needing extensive support beyond basic AWS services.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing is based on device tiers and usage, which can be costly for large deployments. Despite this, companies report positive returns on investment through incident reduction and operational efficiency improvements. Amazon CloudWatch, with a pay-as-you-go model, is seen as affordable for AWS users, though hidden costs related to extensive usage can escalate expenses, making it more cost-effective for those committed to AWS infrastructure.
Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-saving advantages by being an inbuilt solution that requires no separate setup or maintenance for monitoring tasks.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
In recent years, due to business expansion, knowledge levels among support engineers seem to vary.
While using their cloud and cloud resources, if you have an issue with CloudWatch, you must pay additional monthly fees to get time from dedicated tech support.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
It is already there as a managed service from AWS.
Amazon CloudWatch's scalability is managed by AWS.
I sometimes notice slowness when Amazon CloudWatch agents are installed on machines with less capacity, causing me to use other monitoring tools.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
When using third-party dashboards such as Kibana or Grafana and other visualization tools, there should be a way to feed CloudWatch's data and logging capabilities into these visualization tools.
We are in a process of integrating Grafana, Loki, and Prometheus to have better visualization on Amazon CloudWatch.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
Overall, the pricing of Amazon CloudWatch is very expensive.
Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Amazon CloudWatch allows me to set up and view even historical logs, which is one of the features I find valuable.
If there is a CPU spike or system issues, we set alarms to notify us if the system is going down or not reachable.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon CloudWatch | 2.0% |
| ScienceLogic | 2.1% |
| Other | 95.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Amazon CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with AWS, providing real-time monitoring and alerting features. Its interface supports task automation, enhancing troubleshooting and analytics capabilities, while offering strong security and scalability at a cost-effective rate.
Amazon CloudWatch is an impactful platform for monitoring AWS resources and managing application performance. It simplifies infrastructure performance monitoring by providing comprehensive analytics capabilities, including application insights and event scheduling. Users appreciate CloudWatch for its detailed metrics, dashboards, and support in issuing alerts to detect anomalies. It efficiently tracks performance, optimizes resource utilization, and ensures service availability. CloudWatch is recognized for its robust alerting features and integration with other AWS services, further supporting its resource monitoring capabilities. However, there is room for improvement in dashboard customization, log streaming speed, and integration with non-AWS services. Enhancements in API integration, machine learning features, and support for third-party tools are also desired.
What features does Amazon CloudWatch offer?Industries implementing Amazon CloudWatch often focus on optimizing IT infrastructure. Companies in sectors like finance and e-commerce rely on its monitoring and alerting capabilities to ensure service uptime and performance. The platform's automation and analytics features empower teams to proactively manage performance and detect potential issues promptly.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.