We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is really good when it comes to API lifecycle management, and it is not just something that includes the balancing part or the security aspect but also the routing and the fallback mechanism."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a stable solution with an uptime of 99.99 percent."
"Its security feature is the most valuable because it is mainly a security solution. It has easy authentication and authorization, and its integration is also useful."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"It is a stable solution."
"The product is stable."
"The solution is solid, robust, and scalable."
"It's flexible. It was valuable."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"Its support for SAM integration could be made more accessible."
"The pricing could be improved. In cases where customers require real-time sync or real-time calling groups with IoT, the volume of data and time lag become a concern."
"It would be useful to have a more complete development environment for the developer, with different integrative capabilities to manage all the life cycles for the API. I think the full version formula for that is really useful. They should improve the development environment for easier integration."
"When working with XML payloads, there can be issues due to the lack of a seamless connection between API Gateway and Lambda functions."
"API Gateway lacks some governance features that MuleSoft offers, and there are additional features that could make it even better."
"The user interface, in general, can be better. The user interface for the entire Amazon cloud can be more friendly. There are some scenarios that are not really easy to manage and configure through the user interface."
"Their support services come at a considerable cost, leaving room for improvement."
"We faced a few issues with the documentation."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 13th in API Management with 7 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. Coralogix report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
