Alluvio Aternity vs CA App Synthetic Monitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Riverbed and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #34 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #74. Riverbed holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Alluvio Aternity

Read 39 Alluvio Aternity reviews

6,281 Views
4,397 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

1,884 Views
1,865 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Alluvio Aternity

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio Aternity and CA App Synthetic Monitor compete in the IT performance monitoring category. Users generally give Aternity the upper hand due to its easier setup and better customer service, while CA App Synthetic Monitor is praised for its comprehensive features.

Features: Aternity provides comprehensive visibility into end-user experiences, strong monitoring across devices and applications, and better real-time insights. CA App Synthetic Monitor offers advanced synthetic monitoring features, in-depth analytics, and robust IT monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Aternity needs better data granularity, more automation capabilities, and enhancements in data detail. CA App Synthetic Monitor requires better integration with third-party tools, an improved alerting system, and enhanced integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aternity users report a smoother deployment experience and more responsive customer support, while CA App Synthetic Monitor faces criticism for a complex setup process and less supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Aternity users find its initial setup cost reasonable and are satisfied with the ROI. CA App Synthetic Monitor has a higher setup cost, but users feel the ROI justifies the investment due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio Aternity vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio Aternity

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (5th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th)

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

74th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio Aternity is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alluvio Aternity	0.9%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra

Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

Monitoring end-user activity has improved visibility into device and application performance

In my opinion, Riverbed can make Alluvio Aternity better by having the same Aternity agent help in security, such as antivirus or EDR, which would be useful, allowing customers to avoid having multiple agents installed on their endpoint machines. Deploying multiple agents can use the processor and utilize memory, so it's better to go with one agent. If one agent can do end-user activity monitoring and act as an EDR, then it would be better for the end-user, allowing easy avoidance of installing multiple agents on their machines.

Read full review

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As a financial institution, we have a lot of applications that are either written internally or bought from a vendor and customized for us. Having a tool that lets us monitor specific transactions in those applications allows us to focus on the transactions that are important to the business."

"It is a tool that helps me check users' computers really quickly without having a help desk administrator logging in and doing analysis. Anyone who has access to Aternity, including our support team, can log onto Aternity and do a quick, basic analysis."

"It is useful for working out whether there are any issues in the network or between the endpoints. It is also useful for working out any performance issues. It has been useful for a lot of stuff around Teams. Our customers like to know what's happening with Teams when they call in. It is helpful for easily profiling users. It records all the applications that are being used for each user, and you can see what users are doing. It is very good in terms of performance. You don't have to wait forever to try and get reports or results. It is quite quick to get everything that you need out of the software."

"Being able to proactively identify issues on user systems."

"The degree to which Aternity customer support is proactive is off the charts."

"We have pictures from the backend, from a network or a server perspective, but we didn't have any user data; collecting that data manually was pretty time-intensive and relatively inaccurate, and with Aternity, we now have the data."

"The ability to quickly utilize the dashboard to gather information is valuable from a DXI perspective."

"We are dependent on Aternity; we get daily alerts and they help my administration team and my support team a lot because they get to know things in advance and can isolate the problem and start working on it."

More Alluvio Aternity pros

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

Cons

"Being able to add custom monitoring to dashboards would be nice. Right now, if you want to monitor the value of a registry key on your systems, to get that added into the dashboard you have to reach out to Aternity so they can start looking for that value. It would be interesting if that were more of a self-serve function."

"It all comes in pretty nice looking charts and things, but we have a hard time pulling out hard data, which is usually what you'll need if you're trying to be actionable."

"Right now, the user information being displayed by Aternity is received from AD. Ideally, we would like to see integration with other sources for user information, like other databases, so we are not limited to AD."

"I would say the reporting capabilities of this product could use room for improvement. The standard reports that are given are not the greatest, and no custom ones can be created; however, I am told that the latest version of Aternity offers this!"

"I would like to get more granular detail. In regards to defining the applications and activities upfront, that can be challenging. Simplifying that would be a big win. One of the things that I know they are already working on is a verbose mode."

"I would like to see more granular performance counters collected and viewable from the endpoints. That would be great."

"Its user interface and features should be improved. They don't support new versions of certain Linux editions. That is one of the reasons why we have to move to another solution."

"The thing that I think most companies like ourselves would want would be an easier way to customize custom scripts."

More Alluvio Aternity cons

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In my opinion they are asking a lot for their SaaS solution, but I also know that that's the direction they're going... The current, on-prem solution is probably a fair price."

"The pricing for the users and agents is reasonable compared to other solutions and vendors."

"We always try to reduce costs and purchase the Alluvio Aternity Essentials license."

"Our management squeezed Aternity pretty hard on the pricing, in my opinion a little too much. I advise negotiating for sure, but I do think it left kind of a sour taste in Aternity’s mouth that we were being so pushy despite the fact that we were only purchasing a small number of licenses."

"You have to purchase it for 12 months, which is an issue because a lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. There are a few additional costs. A lot of customers only get the essential licenses, and then they get what they call the application add-ons on top. They have to pay depending on how many customers and applications they want to monitor."

"If the scale of your monitoring will be to go everywhere in an organization, a site license is key."

"Regarding cost, compared to other solutions, Aternity is pretty low. It's definitely lower-cost than others that we looked at, like Nexthink."

"It’s a little on the costly side, but if you license intelligently, accounting for your various hosts connecting in through VDI or terminal servers, you can make it well worth your money."

More Alluvio Aternity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	32

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aternity?

Riverbed is costly in the Indian market; I would rate the pricing for Alluvio Aternity as a higher price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aternity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aternity?

The main use case for Alluvio Aternity is end-user activity monitoring, which is the process I'm mainly using currently.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 9% of the time

Nexthink vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 5% of the time

More Alluvio Aternity Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

IDERA Precise vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity

October 2026

Download Alluvio Aternity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Also Known As

Aternity, Workforce APM, Aternity Frontline, Riverbed SteelCenter Aternity

CA ASM

Overview

Alluvio Aternity offers detailed insights into user experience, device health, and application response times. It provides real-time data and visibility for enhanced performance and incident management with customizable monitoring and flexible integration.

Alluvio Aternity is a robust monitoring tool designed for detailed environmental insights, dashboards, and trend analysis that help optimize application performance and incident management. Users benefit from its real-time data, which aids proactive troubleshooting by providing visibility into end-user devices. Custom dashboards, benchmarks, and flexible Tableau integration facilitate easy data manipulation, ensuring comprehensive monitoring of standard and custom applications. While the interface complexity and desire for simpler monitor building pose challenges, Aternity remains a valuable resource for digital experience monitoring and performance assessment, particularly for platforms like Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, and Office 365.

What are the key features of Alluvio Aternity?

Real-Time Data: Provides immediate visibility into end-user devices for proactive troubleshooting.
Custom Dashboards: Allows creation of tailored dashboards for performance evaluation.
Trend Analysis: Offers insight into application performance trends to help optimize operations.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Tableau for versatile data manipulation.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Covers both standard and custom applications for wide-ranging insights.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Alluvio Aternity?

Enhanced Performance: Real-time data aids in improving application and device performance.
Proactive Troubleshooting: Immediate insights enable quicker response to issues.
Custom Monitoring: Tailored dashboards and monitoring cater to unique operational needs.
Flexible Data Use: Integration with tools like Tableau allows for effective data use and analysis.

Enterprises across industries leverage Alluvio Aternity for end-user activity monitoring and application performance assessment. They use its insights for digital experience monitoring and problem isolation, particularly in environments including remote sites and retail branches, measuring key metrics like CPU and memory usage.

Riverbed

CA App Synthetic Monitor provides proactive monitoring of web applications and services to ensure performance and availability. It allows businesses to identify and resolve problems before they impact users.

By simulating user interactions and analyzing application performance, CA App Synthetic Monitor enables businesses to maintain optimal service levels. This cloud-based solution offers a comprehensive view of application health through real-time monitoring and alerts, facilitating quick identification of performance bottlenecks and outages. It helps IT teams enhance user experience by predicting potential issues and optimizing resource allocation. Its flexibility and scalability cater to a range of business needs.

What are key features of CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of web applications to detect issues quickly.
Global Reach: Simulate user transactions from multiple locations worldwide.
Custom Alerts: Set up customized alerts for specific performance thresholds.
Detailed Reporting: Access in-depth analysis of application performance metrics.
Scalability: Easily scalable to match growing business demands.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved User Experience: By identifying issues early, end-users encounter fewer disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime-related costs through early detection and resolution.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures application reliability and reduces service outages.
Time Saving: Automates performance checks to save time for IT teams.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and IT services implement CA App Synthetic Monitor to ensure their software systems remain performant under various conditions. For e-commerce, it assures checkout processes run smoothly. Financial sectors use it to guarantee secure and reliable transaction handling. IT services leverage its capabilities to maintain service level agreements, ensuring customer satisfaction in digital interactions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Maersk, SwissRe, Travis Perkins, Michelin, National Instruments, Simmons & Simmons, Lighthouse Guild

Lexmark

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor

September 2026

Free Report: Alluvio Aternity vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio Aternity vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio Aternity vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.