Alluvio AppResponse vs Avada Software Infrared360 comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Riverbed and Avada Software are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.0, while Avada Software is ranked #73. Riverbed holds a 0.8% mindshare in APM, compared to Avada Software’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Avada Software users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

5,990 Views
2,875 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Avada Software Infrared360

Read 13 Avada Software Infrared360 reviews

4,076 Views
2,038 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

Avada Software Infrared360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Avada Software Infrared360 are both strong contenders in network monitoring and application performance management. Users indicate that Alluvio AppResponse excels in data accuracy and comprehensive monitoring, while Avada Software Infrared360 offers superior features and is deemed worth the price despite higher costs.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Alluvio AppResponse is praised for its detailed monitoring capabilities, actionable insights, and precision data which favor network administrators. Avada Software Infrared360 stands out with advanced automation features, flexible deployment options, and a more robust feature set.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

For Alluvio AppResponse, users suggest enhancements in integration with third-party tools. Avada Software Infrared360 users point out that the configuration process can be complex and would benefit from more intuitive setup options.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Alluvio AppResponse users report a straightforward deployment experience and commend customer support for quick issue resolution. Avada Software Infrared360 requires a more involved setup process but offers extensive documentation and reliable customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Avada Software Infrared360?

Alluvio AppResponse users find the setup cost reasonable with a quick return on investment due to its immediate impact on network performance. Avada Software Infrared360, while more expensive, is seen as a worthwhile investment for its extensive features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Avada Software Infrared360 Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Avada Software Infrared360

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

45th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (47th)

Avada Software Infrared360

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

73rd

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (6th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (12th), Server Monitoring (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Avada Software Infrared360 is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alluvio AppResponse	0.8%
Avada Software Infrared360	0.5%
Other	98.7%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Satyam Kumar

Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Identifies and analyzes performance issues quickly using in-built AI and ML

With Alluvio AppResponse, there is an in-built analytical analysis with AI and ML, which identifies and provides data such as the number of TCP retransmits, web access time, total connection time out, total connections established, and server-side errors. The RTCC response time composition chart is crucial because it helps pinpoint the issue's origin, whether from the server, network, or application side. It's a superb product when compared to SolarWinds SAM, which is agent-based, while Alluvio AppResponse captures all traffic from the core switch.

Read full review

Walter Kuhn

ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems

* We now have the possibility of getting a central perspective on all tenants. * We have defined access roles for developers. Therefore, they can 'read in' their queues on the development and testing stages. With special roles, they may also write. This improves our development and testing cycle. * For operative systems, we have restricted the access. Still, selected people can react if something is happening in the various BOQs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."

"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."

"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."

"Thanks to the Riverbed Steelcentral AppResponse technology our remote services are now focused on monitoring the End User satisfaction instead of watching only the infrastructure."

"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."

"Riverbed's product is a superb product."

"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"IR360 does not require a large team to manage our entire middleware estate and allows the leveraging of a logical model of reuse."

"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"

"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."

"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."

"Administration, Monitoring, and Delegation are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The ability for development teams to have access to their MQ queues has freed us up as administrators to do things other than chase down an application’s message for research purposes."

"I highly recommend Infrared360 for an all-in-one IBM MQ tool."

More Avada Software Infrared360 pros

Cons

"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."

"The admin dashboard could be easier, as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it."

"Technical support has been a problem for us. We had trouble with incompatibility during the implementation phase and they were a little bit late when it came to answering us."

"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."

"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"Marketing is complex and not well understood, so often this product is not considered a good fit just for a surface look."

"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."

"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."

"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."

"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."

"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."

"We definitely need a better overview in terms of a dashboard giving us insights."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."

"Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."

"Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."

"Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Performing Arts

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

We are the partner of Riverbed. Once any customer buys the Riverbed product, we deploy and configure it to meet their use cases. Alluvio AppResponse can identify if a page or an application is slow...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

OmniPeek vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 5% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 8% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 7% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs Avada Software Infrared360

Compared 5% of the time

More Avada Software Infrared360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

Avada Software Infrared360

October 2026

Download Avada Software Infrared360 product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

Infrared360

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse offers comprehensive performance monitoring and visibility for applications, servers, and networks. It captures network traffic and provides analytics, integrated with tools such as Wireshark and Riverbed Transaction Analyzer, aiding in identifying errors and enhancing data analysis.

Alluvio AppResponse is an advanced system designed for detailed monitoring of performance metrics across diverse IT environments. It effectively captures, analyzes, and reports on network traffic, providing valuable insights into application and server response times. With integration capabilities for tools like Wireshark, it allows users to delve deeper into network performance issues. AI and ML functionalities help in identifying TCP retransmits, web access times, and server-side errors, though there is a need for improved integration with other technologies and enhanced security features. Pricing and technical support responsiveness also present challenges. Often deployed near core switches, it's a preferred choice for enterprises looking to analyze application response times and ensure robust application manager visibility, helping to define traffic and applications effectively.

What are the standout features of Alluvio AppResponse?

Performance Monitoring: Tracks performance metrics of applications, servers, and networks in real-time.
Network Traffic Capture: Captures detailed network traffic data for analysis and troubleshooting.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Wireshark and Riverbed Transaction Analyzer for comprehensive analysis.
AI and ML Insights: Utilizes AI and ML to identify TCP retransmits and server-side errors.
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates efficient data gathering and analysis with a user-friendly design.

What benefits should users expect from Alluvio AppResponse?

In-Depth Analytics: Offers robust data analytics for better decision-making.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with scalable modules.
Strategic Metrics: Supports effective troubleshooting through strategic metric analysis.

Alluvio AppResponse finds its applications across various industries including government departments, enterprise data centers, and public sector institutions. It's particularly valuable for monitoring application performance and capacity, analyzing packet captures, and ensuring visibility between servers and end users. Deployed near core switches, it assists organizations in identifying network performance issues and optimizing their IT operations.

Riverbed

Avada Software Infrared360 is a comprehensive monitoring solution designed for businesses to effectively manage their enterprise middleware environments, providing robust support for operational processes.

Avada Software Infrared360 acts as a powerful middleware management tool, offering real-time monitoring and detailed insights into system operations. Designed for seamless integration, it ensures users can troubleshoot and optimize their infrastructure efficiently. With its flexible architecture, users gain centralized control over their middleware systems, making it an invaluable asset for maintaining operational continuity.

What features make Avada Software Infrared360 valuable?

Real-Time Monitoring: Enables live tracking of middleware environments to quickly identify issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform to oversee all deployments, reducing complexity.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalization for enhanced visibility tailored to user needs.
Historical Analytics: Provides data analysis over time to improve system performance and planning.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Avada Software Infrared360?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations through centralized and real-time management.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes system functionality and reduces downtime with immediate issue resolution.
Cost Reduction: Decreases expenses related to managing middleware systems by improving resource allocation.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating expanding middleware requirements without significant re-investment.

Avada Software Infrared360 is particularly effective in industries where large-scale middleware management is crucial, such as finance and telecommunications. These sectors benefit from its robust monitoring capabilities and real-time insights, enabling them to maintain high levels of service and operational efficiency.

Avada Software

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin, Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Avada Software Infrared360

September 2026

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Avada Software Infrared360

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Avada Software Infrared360 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Avada Software Infrared360 report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.