We compared Alation Data Catalog and Microsoft Purview based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Alation Data Catalog focuses on data discovery, governance, collaboration, pricing, and ROI. The platform offers exceptional customer service but requires improvements in navigation, search functionality, and integration with other tools. On the other hand, Microsoft Purview emphasizes data management, governance, collaboration, pricing, and ROI. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and integration with Microsoft products but seek enhancements in functionality, user experience, and integration capabilities for more efficient data management.
Features: Alation Data Catalog stands out for its comprehensive data discovery and search capabilities, data governance functionality, and collaborative features. Microsoft Purview excels in effectively managing data assets, offering a comprehensive view of data, and supporting data governance and compliance requirements. Purview is also praised for its user-friendly interface and seamless integration with other Microsoft products and services.
Pricing and ROI: The setup costs for Alation Data Catalog are deemed reasonable and not overly burdensome, while Microsoft Purview offers comparatively lower setup costs. Alation's licensing agreement is seen as flexible and accommodating, while Purview provides versatile licensing options. Both products offer good value for money and competitive pricing., Alation Data Catalog reportedly achieved positive ROI by providing valuable insights, optimizing data management efficiency, eliminating duplication, and increasing collaboration. Microsoft Purview resulted in a positive ROI by enhancing data governance, accelerating analytics, centralizing data, and enabling cost savings and improved decision-making.
Room for Improvement: The Alation Data Catalog requires enhancement in intuitive navigation, search functionality, collaboration features, and integration with other tools. Microsoft Purview needs improvements in functionality, user-friendliness, data classification, search filters, integration, collaboration, and data ingestion processes.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Alation Data Catalog indicate that the duration for establishing the tech solution can vary among users, with some taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. However, others have reported only a week for both deployment and setup. The context must be considered to accurately evaluate the time required. In contrast, for Microsoft Purview, user feedback suggests that the duration for deploying, setting up, or implementing the solution also varies. Some mentioned three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, implying that both phases should be considered separately. However, there are also users who only required a week for both, indicating that these terms refer to the same period and should not be evaluated independently., The customer service and support of Alation Data Catalog have received positive feedback, with users appreciating the responsive and efficient assistance. Microsoft Purview also offers helpful and responsive customer service to cater to users' needs effectively.
The summary above is based on 49 interviews we conducted recently with Alation Data Catalog and Microsoft Purview users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Given the relatively low level of maturity, Alation's most relevant feature at the moment is a user interface that's easy to navigate, which helps us find and understand the data. So while Alation has a lot more functionality, our pain point right now is being able to easily find, understand, and trust the information to use it."
"Alation Data Catalog's best feature is the SQL query publication."
"We had some of our data science engineers, who had built out some cloud-based data and data products for users. They were spending a lot of their time, up to 30 to 35% of their time, answering questions about the data and helping people understand how to use it. Once they were able to document that information within Alation, they were only focusing on around 5% of the high-value questions that really couldn't be solved through the catalog itself. It freed them up to be more productive, it made their end-users more productive, and it made the adoption rate of their data products rise more quickly because people were able to get to using them."
"The platform's most valuable features are workflow automation, automated business metadata tagging, technical metadata tagging, and data integration with data quality tools or platforms."
"The most valuable features of Alation Data Catalog are the simplicity in onboarding data sources, the security in securing the data sources, and the way the various users of Alation Data Catalog communicate with each other through a messenger."
"We can customize templates based on our use cases."
"The tool's metadata cataloging is the most valuable feature."
"I think Purview does as good a job...I'll say that it is as stable as the data governance maturity that exists within an organization. It can't be more stable than that."
"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."
"The most valuable feature is the tracking activity and device onboarding."
"It is pretty early, but the decision to go with this investment was largely driven by the simplification of our information security technology management stack. That is the primary objective. Once you simplify and you have a connected structure, it allows for faster adoption there. It also gives us additional capabilities as we go on using the technology that we are familiar with, and we do not have to depend on outside parties to come in and tell us how to do certain things."
"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."
"It starts off with records management, insider risk management, and information protection. And there is the discovery of the clouds, and we can get analytics on that as well, so that we know which user is using which cloud application and for how much time. The Activity explorer tells us which user was transferring out what data at what moment and on which device, including the serial number."
"The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens."
"Purview helps mitigate risk and allows us to govern the information being shared among apps and devices."
"The interface is not user-friendly."
"I know that this has been on their roadmap and they're working on it, but as a whole, there's an untapped reservoir of capabilities within their article features that could be used and built upon."
"The product's data governance features need improvement."
"Alation Data Catalog doesn't support end-to-end lineage. By that, I mean the ability to trace the movement of data from when it first comes into our organization to where it's consumed."
"Alation Data Catalog does not provide end-to-end data lineage."
"Alation Data Catalog needs to develop a lot in terms of data governance and would be improved with a built-in interactive data quality solution."
"The tool's domain model needs to be changed."
"Purview's data connector platform for non-Microsoft data sources is good, but there is some functionality that hasn't been developed yet. There are some servers that it can't connect to yet, because they're still in a trial process."
"I lose a little bit of that control when we're talking about third-party connectors. Compliance-wise, I would like to see more ability to audit from a user perspective, where I could extrapolate what the user was thinking or trying to do."
"The API needs some improvement when connecting to non-Microsoft API sources. This is a limiting factor."
"Overcoming certain control issues would significantly enhance our overall satisfaction."
"he one thing it doesn't do is data quality."
"We have had some issues automating our document management with Power Apps. I haven't been super-disappointed with anything except for Power Apps, which kinda drives me nuts. I think it's because I am a coder who can do things properly, and I keep trying to do things there, but it's not working out the way. The security team is pretty quick. I'm kind of a thorn in their side. I always try to get around stuff. They haven't come to me for anything saying, "Hey, I can't find this information." They're pretty good. Maybe, there's a lack of documentation, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for our team."
"We've had a few issues with the scanner. It runs perfectly one day, and on another day, it will run the whole night. It's probably related to the rules. If I set some compliance rules and apply the rules to any column, I can't delete it. I have to disable it and reactivate it."
"The overall cost of deploying this solution could be better. It seems that middle and small-sized organizations are not completely happy with deploying this solution in terms of the cost. It would be good if they concentrate on the cost part."
Alation Data Catalog is ranked 5th in Data Governance with 7 reviews while Microsoft Purview is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 48 reviews. Alation Data Catalog is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Purview is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Alation Data Catalog writes "The catalog now provides an opportunity for people to come together, to share, and to find". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". Alation Data Catalog is most compared with Collibra Governance, Informatica Axon, Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, Collibra Lineage and IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, whereas Microsoft Purview is most compared with Collibra Governance, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon, Collibra Lineage and Microsoft Intune. See our Alation Data Catalog vs. Microsoft Purview report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.