We performed a comparison between Prolexic and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The solution does not have hardware or maintenance requirements and is very easy to scale."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"As a service provider, we use the SecOps dashboard feature. That's where we check the time of attacks to see if an attack is happening at the moment or if it has already happened... It is very dynamic and helps us know when an attack occurred, how long it lasted, and what type of attack it was."
"SSL-based mitigation from DDoS attacks is good from their side. They are capable of preventing SSL-based attacks with certifications and everything loaded onto them."
"It offers valuable insights into ongoing and past attacks, aiding in post-incident analysis and continuous improvement of our cybersecurity strategy."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"A flexible affordable solution for defense against DDos attacks."
"The solution needs additional product options for small and medium enterprises."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"The solution needs a bit more functionality. It would be good if DefensePro could have anti-bot functionalities in order to stop bots like web scrapers from getting onto our customers’ network."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"It would be ideal if they could expand protocol support to cover emerging communication standards and ensure comprehensive protection against diverse attack vectors."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"Right now, we have DefensePro 6. The only complaint I have is that SSL inspection, when activated, consumes a lot of resources on the machine. We are currently reviewing a possible change to DefensePro X, the new version, which has a separate module with its processors."
"We would like to have seven-layer functionality."
Prolexic is ranked 14th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 4 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 6th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 21 reviews. Prolexic is rated 7.8, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Prolexic writes "Scaling is very easy but more options are needed for enterprise environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Prolexic is most compared with Akamai App and API Protector, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare, Arbor DDoS and Azure DDoS Protection, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and F5 Silverline Managed Services.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.