Akamai CloudTest vs ReadyAPI comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and SmartBear are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #13, while SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.3. Akamai holds a 3.0% mindshare in PTT, compared to SmartBear’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,529 Views
1,238 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI

Read 37 ReadyAPI reviews

4,297 Views
1,461 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

ReadyAPI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 5, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and ReadyAPI compete in the testing solutions category, with ReadyAPI often seen as superior due to its extensive features.

Features: Akamai CloudTest offers real-time load testing, scalability, and detailed performance analytics. It integrates with AWS and Jenkins, providing thorough monitoring and dashboards for data insight. ReadyAPI excels in API testing, with a user-friendly design, robust functionality, integration capabilities, and comprehensive testing features all on a single platform.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance ease of use in deployment and expand its API testing capabilities. Simplifying user interface and enhancing integration options can also improve user experience. ReadyAPI may benefit from a simpler setup process, improved handling of high load tests and optimization of resource usage, and enhanced support for large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI is noted for its straightforward deployment process and efficient customer support, ensuring seamless issue resolution and satisfied customers. Akamai CloudTest, while requiring more complex deployment, offers extensive support that contributes to high customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest is cost-effective, providing clear ROI for large-scale performance testing with scalable offerings. ReadyAPI requires a higher initial investment, which is offset by its versatile feature set and long-term value, making up for the higher cost through its comprehensive API testing abilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (13th)

ReadyAPI

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI is 3.1%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ReadyAPI	3.1%
Akamai CloudTest	3.0%
Other	93.9%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

PrashanthKumar

Lead QA Engineer at Msys Technologies

Experience effective testing with flexible licensing alongside pivotal insights on essential improvements

For non-functional testing, I focus on performance and security. For performance and security tests, I used REST API, SoapUI, and JMeter. These tools help us conduct thorough testing across these dimensions. I find ReadyAPI helpful especially in overcoming security issues, as we experienced slowness in the application after merging our JAR files. For instance, if a person wants to access a university database and encounters a timeout error, we learned through ReadyAPI that the issue was due to HTML protocol limits with the payload. We fine-tuned this process to display the expected data effectively. I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing. ReadyAPI is a versatile tool for creating multiple testing frameworks and validating various parameters seamlessly. REST API is the tool I use to test all three types of articles, meaning I validate the APIs I send to my peers or clients for functional testing, and I also perform security testing to ensure the URL and data passed through multiple components adhere to policies and user privileges. This is done through functional security testing using the REST API tool, and for performance, I ensure that applications can be accessed simultaneously by multiple users without hindrance or slowness through thorough performance testing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The solution is very stable."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client."

"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are the scripting tools and the connectivity to external data sources, such as Excel and PDF files. There are plenty of useful features that are useful, such as automating flexibility and usability. Overall, the solution is easy to use."

"On average we used to automate five to seven scenarios using the open source version, however we have seen that we can automate more than 25 to 30 scenarios using the commercial version."

"It's great for those that don't have as much exposure to programming."

"The feature that allows you to import an API collection or a project is valuable."

"Without it, we cannot release anything."

"The most valuable feature has been the assertion as a test step as this has allowed us to increase the scope of testing and validation."

"The feature I find valuable is project management, as it allows us to organize our test cases and suites inside the project and store variables as properties so they can be used across test cases and test suites at the project, test suite, or test case level."

Cons

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"ReadyAPI can improve because it is limited to only SOAP and REST services. They should update the solution to include more protocols so that other people are not limited to SOAP and REST services. Other than would be able to utilize it."

"There is a lot of room for improvement, mainly from the point of view of integrating ReadyAPI into the CI pipelines, and also the scripting aspect into Bitbucket."

"The licensing is sometimes a barrier for our customers. You need to have separate licenses for functional tests, load testing and virtual (mock) services."

"I would say if anything needs to be improved, maybe it's some aspects of the user interface."

"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."

"Based on my experience, ReadyAPI could improve by simplifying the process of scripting."

"If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful."

"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The price was around $6,000 for one license, but I don't remember exactly. It is definitely expensive. Our organization was planning on having multiple licenses for this year."

"It costs approximately $200 000 Taiwan Dollars for three years."

"If I remember correctly, ReadyAPI costs between $5,000 to $7,000 for five thousand virtual users running it at a given point in time. Other tools, for example, Apache JMeter, can run millions of users at a given time. ReadyAPI is a tool that requires you to pay more money if you want more users to run it for performance testing. For functional testing, each ReadyAPI license costs $1,000, and you do get basic testing, and it's inclusive of one hundred users. In my company, if there's a need for more than one hundred users, my team uses Apache JMeter because it's futile to end up paying $5,000 or $6,000 annually just for performance testing, which can be done in Apache JMeter as well. Given the circumstances, my team does performance testing only towards the end of the fiscal year when the regulatory testing of applications takes place. If I have to run ReadyAPI just for two days or just for ten or fifteen odd days, then it's not worth paying $5,000 for the license with the small number of users provided by ReadyAPI."

"There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more."

"We have approximately 12 licenses in place. There are other solutions that are more expensive than ReadyAPI that have more features, but if the scope of the project is limited to SOAP and REST service, then this is the best option."

"It is expensive. Each user needs to be licensed, and there are different licenses within the product. It starts with 750 euros for a single user per year, but for the full product features, you need to pay a lot more. There are three versions. This cost is for functional testing, and then there is a cost for load testing and virtual services. If you want to use these areas with the functional test license, you are limited. You hit some limits in these functions. If you have all three licenses, then you have full functionality for the API."

"The thing with ReadyAPI is that you have to buy different licenses for different purposes."

"For each license, they charge the same amount, which is less than $1,000 for each desktop license."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI?

Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs. License prices can be a factor in considering which technologies to adopt.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI?

One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI. We created an in-house dashboard to display automation runs across projects, which required manual updati...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ReadyAPI?

My experience with Katalon Studio is that we used Katalon for one of our projects, and then I started leveraging Katalon by integrating it with AI tools, AP tools, and aptly tools. Aptly tool is an...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 2% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI

Compared 8% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs ReadyAPI

Compared 6% of the time

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

October 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI

September 2026

Download ReadyAPI product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Ready API

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

ReadyAPI stands out for its API testing capabilities and integration with development tools like Jira and Git. Its user-friendly interface and automation with Groovy scripting make it a suitable, efficient choice for developers aiming for seamless project management and test execution.

ReadyAPI presents a comprehensive suite for API testing, supporting functional, performance, and security tasks with minimal coding required. It offers robust integration with tools such as Postman and CI/CD processes, enabling users to manage and automate testing scenarios efficiently. Despite its strengths, users notice limitations in performance and cloud integration, especially in scalability and test management. While it facilitates data-driven testing through Excel and supports on-premise and cloud environments, ReadyAPI could benefit from improved reporting and simpler scripting processes. Its interface and GitHub integration would further enhance its adaptability for larger projects and diverse applications.

What are ReadyAPI's main features?

Smart Assertion: Simplifies API validation with efficient testing mechanisms.
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Enhances ease of use and streamlines workflow.
Groovy Scripting Automation: Allows for advanced automation without extensive coding.
Data-Driven Testing: Utilizes Excel files for managing test scenarios effectively.
CI/CD Integration: Ensures smooth project management and test execution across development cycles.

Why consider ReadyAPI in your evaluations?

Testing Efficiency: Reduces coding requirements, allowing for rapid test case development and validation.
Tool Integration: Seamless compatibility with platforms like Jira and Postman boosts workflow.
Cost-Effective: Offers a versatile toolset for developers without excessive expenditure.
Reporting Options: Provides comprehensive insights to refine testing outcomes and strategies.

ReadyAPI is principally leveraged by industries that require precise API testing capabilities, spanning functional, performance, and security assessments. Its ease of integrating with CI/CD tools and ability to manage backend APIs make it an ideal choice in sectors that prioritize automation and reliability in testing processes. Companies operating within on-premise and cloud environments benefit from its support for diverse testing needs and scenarios, ensuring improved testing proficiency and response validation.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Healthcare Data Solutions (HDS)

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. ReadyAPI report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.