Akamai CloudTest vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing comparison

Akamai and Dotcom-Monitor are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #18. Akamai holds a 3.5% mindshare in LTT, compared to Dotcom-Monitor’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,257 Views
1,056 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews

573 Views
556 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing compete in the software stress testing category. While Dotcom-Monitor LoadView has the upper hand in features, Akamai CloudTest offers better pricing and customer support.

Features: Akamai CloudTest provides real-time analytics and supports large-scale tests. Additionally, it ensures robust performance assessment. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing offers powerful scripting capabilities and browser-based testing. Its ability to simulate real-world user experiences and conduct tests across diverse environments gives it an advantage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing allows straightforward deployment with its cloud-based model, making it agile in initiating tests with less setup. Akamai CloudTest requires more preparation, potentially delaying deployment, but provides strong customer support throughout the process.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest delivers cost-effective scalable solutions suitable for businesses with varying needs. Although Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing might be more costly, its advanced features and comprehensive capabilities offer high ROI. Akamai CloudTest offers better value at a lower price, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView justifies a higher cost with extensive offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (8th)

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.5%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai CloudTest	3.5%
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing	1.6%
Other	94.9%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

reviewer1631949

Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up

It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

"The solution is very stable."

"Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"LoadView is a flexible solution, which protects your investments."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"LoadView is a perfect cloud-based load testing tool."

"The initial setup is easy, and if you need more help, they are there to assist."

Cons

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"If I do the web application test, I want to bypass a login part."

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

BlazeMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 25% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Flood vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 10% of the time

More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

June 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

June 2026

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report

Download Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

LoadView Stress Testing

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing offers a comprehensive approach to performance testing, enabling organizations to validate the resilience and performance of their web applications under stress.

Designed for accuracy and detail, Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing provides insights into application performance under peak load conditions. It supports complex test scenarios to ensure optimal capacity planning and server management. Organizations can simulate various load conditions accurately through real browser testing, identifying potential bottlenecks before they impact user experience.

What are the key features?

Real Browser Testing: Simulate real user activity for precise load testing.
Cloud Infrastructure: Leverage cloud-based resources for scalable testing capabilities.
Geo-Distributed Testing: Run tests from multiple locations globally.
Comprehensive Reporting: Access detailed insights and reports for analysis.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Scalability: Easily handle increased traffic without compromising performance.
Cost Efficiency: Optimize resource allocation and reduce maintenance costs.
Improved Performance: Enhance user experience through proactive testing.
Risk Mitigation: Identify vulnerabilities and address them promptly.

In e-commerce, Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing helps manage high traffic spikes during peak seasons, such as Black Friday, ensuring smooth transactions. In finance, it validates system robustness during end-of-quarter processes, while in media, it supports streaming services facing high-demand scenarios. Integration varies by industry, adapting testing methodology to specific needs.

Dotcom-Monitor

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

June 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.