Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] vs Skyvia comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Actian and Skyvia are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Additionally, 50% of Actian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Skyvia users who would recommend it.

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Read 6 Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

Skyvia

Read 1 Skyvia review

2,824 Views
1,892 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Skyvia

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Actian Pervasive Data Integrator and Skyvia are competitors in the data integration category. Skyvia appears to have an advantage due to its advanced features and value, despite Actian's competitive pricing and support elements.

Features: Actian Pervasive Data Integrator is notable for its comprehensive data integration capabilities, supporting a broad range of data sources, and providing reliable integration. Skyvia prioritizes scalability with its cloud-based flexibility, intuitive data management, and ease of access. Skyvia’s scalable, modern features make it a preferred choice for tech consumers seeking efficient management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Actian Pervasive Data Integrator may require substantial setup due to its older architecture, yet offers solid customer support. Skyvia provides a cloud-based deployment model simplifying initial setup, alongside responsive support, appealing to those favoring quick deployment and ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Actian Pervasive Data Integrator may involve higher initial setup costs due to specialized integration needs, affecting ROI timelines. Skyvia, with its subscription-based pricing, offers lower entry costs and quicker ROI through streamlined operations. Its affordability and rapid implementation make Skyvia a cost-effective choice long-term.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Average Rating

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Skyvia

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (63rd), Cloud Data Integration (29th)

Featured Reviews

BI Shnu Bhatta

Associate Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It is stable and we did not have any issues with initial setup. I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version to support the wide range of sources available.

I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME) I have been using it for 6-7 months. There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability…

Read full review

Robert-Harris

CTO & Developer at a consultancy with self employed

The product works, is simple to use, and is reliable.

Error handling. This has caused me many problems in the past. When an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented. If I attempt a retry or opt not to display an error dialog, it does it anyway. In all fairness, I have never reported this. I think it is more important that a unique error code is passed to the error event that identifies a uniform type of error that occurred, such as ecDisconnect, eoInvalidField. It is very hard to find what any of the error codes currently passed actually mean. A list would be great for each database engine. Trying to catch an exception without displaying the UniDAC error message is impossible, no matter how you modify the parameters in the OnError of the TUniConnection object. I have already implemented the following things myself. They are suggestions rather than specific requests. Copy Datasets: This contains an abundance of redundant options. I think that a facility to copy one dataset to another in a single call would be handy. Redundancy: I am currently working on this. I have extended the TUniConnection to have an additional property called FallbackConnection. If the TUniConnection goes offline, the connection attempts to connect the FallbackConnection. If successful, it then sets the Connection properties of all live UniDatasets in the app to the FallbackConnection and re-opens them if necessary. The extended TUniConnection holds a list of datasets that were created. Each dataset is responsible for registering itself with the connection. This is a highly specific feature. It supports an offline mode that is found in mission critical/point of sale solutions. I have never seen it implement before in any DACs, but I think it is a really unique feature with a big impact. Dataset to JSON/XML: A ToSql function on a dataset that creates a full SQL Text statement with all parameters converted to text (excluding blobs) and included in the returned string. Extended TUniScript:- TMyUniScript allows me to add lines of text to a script using the normal dataset functions, Script.Append, Script.FieldByName(‘xxx’).AsString := ‘yyy’, Script.AddToScript and finally Script.Post, then Script.Commit. The AddToScript builds the SQL text statement and appends it to the script using #e above. Record Size Calculation. It would be great if UniDac could estimate the size of a particular record from a query or table. This could be used to automatically set the packet fetch/request count based on the size of the Ethernet packets on the local area network. This I believe would increase performance and reduce network traffic for returning larger datasets. I am aware that this would also be a unique feature to UniDac but would gain a massive performance enhancement. I would suggest setting the packet size on the TUniConnection which would effect all linked datasets.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."

"This product is extremely useful and better than building an in-house solution."

"We have been using it for ETL, it is very robust and easy to use."

"Web based interface."

"For data transfers and ETLs on Windows, this is a great product."

"For what it offers, I think this solution is a must for any Delphi programmer."

Cons

"At the moment, we can't even use it for 1, since it keeps failing in our QA testing."

"The areas which I think need to be improved are the transform and load steps."

"Technical support is an area which can definitely improve."

"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."

"Error handling has caused me many problems in the past; when an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

15%

Performing Arts

15%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

SSIS vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Competitors

AWS Database Migration Service vs Skyvia

Compared 21% of the time

SSIS vs Skyvia

Compared 14% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs Skyvia

Compared 10% of the time

CData Drivers vs Skyvia

Compared 7% of the time

Zapier vs Skyvia

Compared 6% of the time

More Skyvia Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

October 2026

Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] report

Download Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

October 2026

Download Skyvia product report

Also Known As

Pervasive Data Integrator, PDI

Skyvia, Skyvia Data Integration

Overview

Pervasive's Data Integrator platform is a robust enterprise data integration software solution that enables you to quickly build powerful and frictionless connections between any kind of data source and application.

Actian

Skyvia is a leading data integration and management platform designed to centralize data consolidation efforts for businesses, acting as a versatile tool for seamless data exchange across cloud apps and on-premises systems.

Skyvia integrates with a multitude of cloud services and databases, facilitating efficient data synchronization, replication, and backup. Users benefit from its intuitive wizard-driven interface which simplifies complex integration tasks without requiring extensive technical knowledge. This accessibility makes it ideal for IT professionals looking to streamline data handling.

What are Skyvia's most valuable features?

Data Integration: Simplifies cloud-to-cloud, cloud-to-ground, and ground-to-ground data connections without coding.
Data Backup: Ensures data safety by providing automated backups of essential information, enabling quick recovery.
Query Tool: Offers a powerful SQL editor for running ad-hoc queries and visualizing data with ease.
Data Synchronization: Keeps data up-to-date across platforms ensuring consistency and reliability.
Connectors: Extensive library of connectors catering to top cloud services and databases for flexibility.

Which benefits and ROI factors should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Users appreciate the intuitive setup and integration process requiring minimal technical input.
Cost-Effective: Offers competitive pricing aligning with budget-conscious strategies while delivering high value.
Scalability: Flexible solutions that scale with business growth, adapting to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on data handling tasks, allowing more focus on analytical and strategic initiatives.

Industries such as retail, healthcare, and finance implement Skyvia for seamless integration across multiple databases and cloud applications. Retail chains use it for consistent product data management across platforms, while healthcare providers employ it to consolidate patient data securely. Financial institutions leverage its robust data synchronization to maintain accurate financial records. Skyvia proves effective in enabling industry-specific solutions tailored to improve data accessibility and ensure integrity.

Skyvia

Sample Customers

Pediatrix Medical Group

Boeing, Sony, Honda, Oracle, BMW, Samsung

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Palantir and others in Data Integration. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.