42Crunch API Security Platform vs NGINX App Protect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
42Crunch Logo
486 views|374 comparisons
F5 Logo
442 views|319 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 42Crunch API Security Platform and NGINX App Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security.
To learn more, read our detailed API Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use 42Crunch API Security Platform?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
  • "Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
  • "Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
  • "There are no additional fees."
  • "NGINX is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is reasonable because NGINX operates on an instance basis."
  • "There is a license needed to use NGINX App Protect."
  • "There are not any additional costs we had to pay to use NGINX App Protect."
  • More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution has yearly, three-year, and five-year subscriptions.
    Top Answer:NGINX App Protect could provide a better user interface.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 21 in API Security
    Views
    486
    Comparisons
    374
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 21 in API Security
    Views
    442
    Comparisons
    319
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    334
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    42 Crunch builds the security platform which automatically generates the appropriate security policies for enterprises APIs and their hosting infrastructure, thanks to an innovative risk assessment tooling. The 42 Crunch platform empowers security teams and enables for close collaboration with development and operations teams, an approach known as DevSecOps.

    NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

    • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
    • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
    • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
    • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

    NGINX App Protect offers:

    • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
    • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
    • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
    • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
    • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
    • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
    • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
    • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
    • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
    • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Insurance Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    API Security
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    42Crunch API Security Platform is ranked 6th in API Security while NGINX App Protect is ranked 3rd in API Security with 19 reviews. 42Crunch API Security Platform is rated 0.0, while NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". 42Crunch API Security Platform is most compared with Traceable AI, Noname Security and Salt Security, whereas NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Web Application Firewall.

    See our list of best API Security vendors.

    We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.