Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface
Pros and Cons
  • "AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."
  • "Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon S3 Glacier for hosting web files for testing.

We take a lot of data from the police to do ANPR. It's basically for big data to allow bandwidth on the data center, where there are about 1,000 images per second coming through to the data center.

What is most valuable?

AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything.

What needs improvement?

Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged.

At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second.

The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used Amazon S3 Glacier for years.

Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
August 2025
Learn what your peers think about Amazon S3 Glacier. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the stability a nine-point nine out of ten. They've got shared data services, giving you an SLA of about 0.001%.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There's a huge amount of data on Amazon's data center. Every camera in the West Midlands takes photographs of cars constantly and loads all the data into the data center. Since Lambda is Python, I'd rate the scalability a ten out of ten. I understand the API Gateway completely. But when it comes to security, I'd rate it a three out of ten. AWS, as a whole package for what it provides, I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support team has a lot of people who know their stuff.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is difficult, not because of applications like S3 or VMs or firewalls and gateways, but because of security. The most important thing about using AWS isn't the tools you will use. It's the security you apply to it. The solution's security is a complex area involving services that talk to each other and how the users interact with those services, whether internal or external, to be logged into AWS. The people in security need to be certified.

The deployment was a continual process, working with several external organizations, such as the transport police in my case. Setting up Amazon takes under an hour if you've got everything available. But the process starts with knowing the tools we need to achieve what we're trying to do. Amazon is very good at talking, explaining what they've got, and upselling. They'll tell me exactly what you need, though they won't tell me how much it costs. But that process takes months to understand unless we get free services to trial and test the solution before you start going into it.

What was our ROI?

I've seen value and impact in my organization using Amazon S3 Glacier.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You need a PhD to understand their pricing model. We often sit through meetings, going through all of these documents from AWS, going through how to calculate pricing based on so many different factors. At the end of it, there's a fear when the bill comes in because nobody understands how much it's gonna be.

AWS has these pricing calculators. You type in which server you want and how much usage, but at the end, you don't feel confident when it says $3.98 because I know that we were paying £20,000 per month for AWS services at one point. Some of the other services are RedShift and something else. When pulling in data for the police for ANPR, storing the data in the UK data center costs a fortune.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a ten out of ten.

Two bits of advice: make sure you get a specialist with things like security, such as network security. The security is indirect with AWS. You could get an expert in Python using Lambda, but it doesn't make you a network security person. Once you've got a million pounds worth of business data in Amazon, you could potentially share that with the planet if you don't know how to set up the security. Get the relevant technical specialist for things like security.

The second bit of advice is to completely understand the pricing structure.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Kiran Rajanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG
Real User
Top 10
A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint
Pros and Cons
  • "The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier."
  • "Technical support needs improvement. Previously, even though we had premium and enterprise support, the response time would be quicker if we ran into issues, but now it is slowed down. The analytical dashboard feature, like the CloudOps dashboard, should be included in the next release of the Amazon S3 Glacier."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon S3 Glacier for several purposes. We have buckets for our pipelines, software repository, timesheets, and performance data. As per state regulations, we must retain this data for eight years. So to comply with these regulations, we have set up a lifecycle policy in S3 that moves the data to Glacier after five years. This means the data will be stored in Glacier for the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth years. We can retrieve the data from Glacier if we need to access it during this time. Beyond five years, the data will remain in Glacier for three years.

How has it helped my organization?

The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Glacier is that it automatically processes archives. Glacier's performance is also very good. We initially thought retrieving objects from Glacier would be difficult but easy and quick.

What needs improvement?

Technical support needs improvement. Previously, even though we had premium and enterprise support, the response time would be quicker if we ran into issues, but now it is slowed down.

The analytical dashboard feature, like the CloudOps dashboard, should be included in the next release of the Amazon S3 Glacier.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier since 2016. We are using the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the solution’ stability a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the solution’ scalability an eight out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

There is no need for deployment at all since it is a service.

What was our ROI?

We have seen ROI with the product's use. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is cheap.

What other advice do I have?

If you plan to store your documents for over three years, I recommend using Amazon Glacier S3 to the fullest extent possible. This is because the longer you store your data in the tool, the more you pay. By moving most of your objects to Glacier, you can save money. Additionally, you can use Reserved Capacity to save even more money. Retrieving data from Amazon S3 Glacier is relatively easy. It is easier than retrieving data from the tool. So, I think people should use the product as much as possible.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
August 2025
Learn what your peers think about Amazon S3 Glacier. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cloud Platform Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 10
A storage solution that can be used for data retrieval, security, compliance, and storage archiving
Pros and Cons
  • "Data retrieval, security, compliance, and storage archiving are the most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier."
  • "The solution's cost optimization could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon S3 Glacier to provide secure and durable data archiving at a low cost compared to the standard storage options. I'm currently working with Azure Cloud, and I have done most of the migration from Amazon S3 Glacier to Azure Blob Storage.

Amazon S3 Glacier is used to store data, files, and required certificates.

What is most valuable?

Data retrieval, security, compliance, and storage archiving are the most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier.

What needs improvement?

The solution's cost optimization could be improved. The solution uses the monitoring storage cost, implementing cost-saving strategies for transitioning data to the Glacier storage classes and defining the appropriate retrieval options.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for more than three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate Amazon S3 Glacier an eight out of ten for stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate Amazon S3 Glacier an eight out of ten for scalability.

How are customer service and support?

I rate the solution's technical support seven and a half out of ten.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have previously used Azure Blob Storage.

How was the initial setup?

Amazon S3 Glacier's initial setup wasn't that hard, but it was challenging.

What was our ROI?

We have seen a return on investment with Amazon S3 Glacier. With Amazon S3 Glacier, the more you pay, the more you'll get. The resources that we pay for depend completely upon the client.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Amazon S3 Glacier has good pricing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

My organization uses the Azure cloud platform which is cheaper compared to Amazon S3 Glacier.

What other advice do I have?

Amazon S3 Glacier was deployed on-cloud in our organization.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Shubham-Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder & CTO at QuriousBit
Real User
Top 5
A highly stable and cheap storage solution that can be used by users to store infrequently used data
Pros and Cons
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data."
  • "Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions."

What is most valuable?

Our source metadata used for analytics and data lake was kept on Amazon S3 Glacier. Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data. If we have a large amount of data that many people are not accessing, we keep it in Amazon S3 Glacier to save the cost.

What needs improvement?

Users have to pay much less for storing data in Amazon S3 Glacier. However, it is costly to access the data from the solution. If somebody requires a large amount of data kept in Amazon S3 Glacier, that will cost a lot.

Amazon S3 Glacier becomes very costly when used on a big scale. Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for four and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable solution. More than 100 users were using the solution, and we plan to increase the usage.

I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for scalability.

How was the initial setup?

The solution's initial setup is very easy. I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

What about the implementation team?

Someone with a little knowledge of the solution can deploy it in a day. One person is enough to deploy the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data. We used to spend around $ 200 a day on the solution.

What other advice do I have?

Amazon S3 Glacier is a cloud-based solution. Amazon S3 Glacier is the best alternative for users who have to access a large amount of data.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Cuneyt-Gurses - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Cloud Solution Group at DTech Cloud Corporation
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
Reliable platform with secure data encryption features
Pros and Cons
  • "The deployment process was straightforward."
  • "The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times."

What is our primary use case?

We use the platform for building data packages and storage, which involves efficient data handling and backup solutions.

What is most valuable?

The platform provides reliable and scalable storage, secure data encryption, and easy data retrieval options.

What needs improvement?

The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for more than four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is highly stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is highly scalable. 

How are customer service and support?

We rarely need technical support due to the comprehensive documentation available. However, the response time needs improvement. 

How was the initial setup?

The deployment process was straightforward and typically takes 15 to 30 minutes, depending on the configuration requirements.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend Amazon S3 Glacier an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Praneeth N - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Product Management at SID GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Real User
Top 5
Useful for application data storage and retrieval and for data backup
Pros and Cons
  • "I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner."
  • "I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the market."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution for storage. We use it for application data storage and retrieval and for data backup. It has various use cases for storing applications, platforms, or other data types.

What is most valuable?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner. 

What needs improvement?

I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the market.

In terms of improvements, I believe AWS could enhance the service by providing regional accelerators to reduce network latency and offering options for caching buckets for easier configuration. Additionally, providing options to specify usage duration for particular sessions or partitions would be beneficial. While it is intuitive to some extent, there is room for improvement to make it even more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Monitoring apps and systems should be part of deployment. You should be able to set up auto-scaling and alerts during deployment. For example, you could get a warning if CPU usage hits 70 percent and a critical alert at 80 percent.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't come across many instances of large data volume. However, when we encounter it, it seems to be more about ensuring that our applications can handle the workload. Fortunately, we haven't experienced any significant lag issues. 

How are customer service and support?

I haven't contacted the support team yet. We don't have any specific support package from Amazon for the services we're using. Instead, we rely on Amazon's public support. 

How was the initial setup?

Amazon S3 Glacier's deployment is straightforward. The deployment process typically involves several steps. Firstly, you must acquire the image, select the appropriate zone, and deploy it within it. Following that, you would define the necessary parameters. In my experience, I've mostly worked with virtual machines rather than containers.

Typically, a team of just one person is sufficient for deployment and maintenance, maybe with a mentor. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports. 

What other advice do I have?

I haven't extensively used the retrieval options. Generally, we haven't encountered any significant issues with the service, although occasional network latency might occur due to various factors such as server positioning. However, the retrieval process has been fairly reliable.

Rating the tool on a scale from one to ten is quite challenging. It's akin to comparing different brands of ovens, such as Murphy Richards, Samsung, or LG. All of them are excellent in performing their basic function. However, the differences lie in their operation, user interface, and user-friendliness. Similarly, AWS stands out as a leader in virtual services, but comparing it directly to others is not straightforward.

I rate it a nine out of ten. The tool's integration into existing workflows is simple. Whether or not to recommend it depends on the requirements of the individual or organization. It's essential to assess what kind of data they intend to use it for and what their data needs are. Appropriate recommendations can be made based on these factors and other qualifying queries.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1539126 - PeerSpot reviewer
Forensic Technology Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
An economical and easy-to-use solution that has a good upload and download speed
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is easy to use."
  • "The user experience must be improved."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is used for cloud storage.

What is most valuable?

The product is fairly economical. The upload and download speed is good. It is consistent. The solution is easy to use. We can use S3 Browser to upload and download data efficiently.

What needs improvement?

The user experience must be improved. The product must have a feature similar to Azure Storage Explorer. The product must not rely on third-party providers.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool is more focused on a one-to-one connection. It's not server-focused. It is for front-end users to make it easy for people to store and access S3. Around 20 people in our organization use the product. We use the tool on a daily basis.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also use Azure Blob Storage.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very easy. We just have to install a small application on our desktop. We do not need the help of a technical team.

What was our ROI?

It's easy to share data between people. It's geared towards large datasets. SharePoint is for smaller files. However, Amazon S3 Glacier is for uploading and downloading a lot of data.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is very cheap.

What other advice do I have?

We get two versions of the solutions. The amount of data we can upload on the free version is limited. The Pro version has more bandwidth. I recommend using the Pro version for more flexibility and speed. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Dwight Tuhusula - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Architecture Manager at Accenture
Real User
Top 5
A cost-effective solution that can be use for archival storage of data
Pros and Cons
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved."

What is our primary use case?

I use Amazon S3 Glacier for archival storage of data.

What is most valuable?

Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services.

What needs improvement?

Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable solution. Thousands of users are using Amazon S3 Glacier globally.

How was the initial setup?

Amazon S3 Glacier's initial setup is easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving.

What other advice do I have?

Users should choose Amazon S3 Glacier depending on their requirements. If someone wants to keep their data for ten years, they should use Amazon S3 Glacier. On the other hand, if someone wants to keep their data for one year, there is no need to use the solution.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon S3 Glacier Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon S3 Glacier Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.