Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Reviews

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Get the Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Darktrace, Vectra AI and more!
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is the #6 ranked solution in top Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. PeerSpot users give Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most commonly compared to Darktrace: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Darktrace. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 53% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Featured Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

Read more reviews

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category stands at 7.4%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention7.4%
Darktrace18.8%
Vectra AI10.7%
Other63.099999999999994%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

PeerResearch reports based on Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)Aug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs DarktraceAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Check Point IPSAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Fortinet FortiGate IPSAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Darktrace4.118.8%94%82 interviewsAdd to research
Vectra AI4.310.7%97%45 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention offers valuable features such as quality of service, anti-malware protection, next-generation firewall capabilities, and simplicity in management. It includes easy-to-use interface, URL filtering, vulnerability protection, and application control. WildFire provides exceptional sandboxing and edge protection against zero-day threats. Machine learning enhances threat detection by analyzing network traffic. Its real-time response capability is essential for effective threat interception. Integration with other Palo Alto tools strengthens overall security infrastructure.
  • "Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention provides protections against both known and unknown threats quickly, and they have great Cyber Threat Alliance integration, which allows anything that is even unknown to get to our systems quickly in terms of being patched."
  • "I rate Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention as nine out of ten."
  • "The most valuable feature is its use of machine learning to detect potentially unknown threats."

Room for Improvement

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention needs better email filtering capabilities and enhanced mail security. Users seek improvements in pricing, documentation, Reverse DNS functionalities, and simplicity in setup. Integration of features like SD Wan, AI analytics, and reduced false positives is desired. There are issues with obtaining test licenses and configuring it with Panorama. The support system, especially in regions like Saudi Arabia, also requires enhancement for quick response times.
  • "While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions."
  • "The behavioral detection capabilities could be expanded to address all threats at the perimeter, reducing the reliance on endpoint detection and response systems."
  • "There is a potential drawback with the lack of support for the ICAP protocol."

ROI

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention delivers fast and effective security. Users report substantial financial benefits with consistent growth, especially in Italy. The feature set is comprehensive, offering good value despite its cost. Significant financial gains and increased customer retention are evident, although precise calculation of impact remains challenging due to its layered defense strategy. Users gain valuable security insights, leading to time and cost savings, reinforcing high satisfaction levels and encouraging continued usage.

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention offers extensive threat detection at a competitive but higher price point compared to alternatives like Cisco and FortiGate. Organizations find the pricing structure straightforward, with yearly licensing and limited discounts of up to 15%. The hardware is expensive, with devices starting around $4,000, making it costlier for smaller companies or those in regions like Africa and Mauritius. Despite the high price, users appreciate its efficiency and scalability.
  • "Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."
  • "The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
  • "The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for network security. Key applications include firewall capabilities, application control, threat prevention, encryption, intrusion detection and prevention, traffic analysis, and network testing. It offers features like machine learning for detecting unknown threats, vulnerability and antivirus capabilities, file blocking, and DNS sinkhole blocking. Companies also deploy it for content filtering, general user security, and protecting LAN and WAN traffic, with both cloud and on-premises options available.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention are rated as good by most. Some report slower response times and challenges with third-party support in regions like Africa. While many find technical support reliable with good troubleshooting, others note difficulties in communication and delays in addressing issues. Ratings vary from six to nine out of ten, highlighting room for improvement in responsiveness and direct contact procedures.

Deployment

Experiences with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention's initial setup vary widely. Some found it complex, requiring significant time and expertise, especially compared to competitors like Fortinet and Cisco. Others noted it was straightforward and intuitive, particularly for those with prior experience. Deployment times ranged from minutes to several months, influenced by network complexity and organizational needs. Instances with custom signatures or specific environments added to complexity, while simpler networks found it easy and quick to deploy.

Scalability

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is highly scalable, supporting thousands of users and offering flexibility across different environments. Organizations frequently report efficient deployment and ease in meeting diverse enterprise needs. While it scales well for various sizes, pricing might impact scalability decisions. Its range of device models accommodates expanded bandwidth and features. Users rate its scalability highly, finding it suitable for small to large-sized companies with the capability to handle extensive endpoints and servers.

Stability

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is consistently stable, rated highly by many. Users report rare issues, usually tied to specific models or versions. The stability surpasses competitors like Cisco and Fortinet. Deployment may require some downtime, and signature updates can occasionally affect traffic. Despite isolated bugs, users find the platform reliable, often rating its stability ten out of ten. Correct version usage is advised for optimal stability.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business131
Midsize Enterprise86
Large Enterprise242
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Performing Arts
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Construction Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Media Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Security Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Related questions

  • 109
What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
  • 15
When evaluating Intrusion Detection, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 132
What is your recommended cost-effective solution to detect and prevent APT attacks?
  • 4
What product do you recommend for a Campus IPS appliance implementation?
  • 44
How do you use the MITRE ATT&CK framework for improving enterprise security?
  • 211
What are the pros and cons of Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon vs alternative EPP solutions?
  • 117
Which alternative solutions (other than Darktrace) do you recommend for an SMB?
  • 10
Which is the best intrusion detection and prevention solution?
  • 10
What is the best IDPS security tool and why?
  • 837
What is Cognitive Cybersecurity and what is it used for?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Cisco IOS Security vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco IOS Security vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Zscaler Cloud IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Zscaler Cloud IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
See all alternatives
 
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Principal Security Architect at Deloitte4.5I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for intelligent threat protection, focusing on both known and evolving threats with behavioral analytics. While its integration is seamless within the Palo Stack, expanding detection and reducing false positives would enhance effectiveness.
Global Network Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for years due to its strong threat detection, real-time protection, and analytics, though I think usability in hybrid environments and pricing could use improvement as AI threats evolve.
Presales Engineer at SAUDI PARAMOUNT COMPUTER SYSTEMS1.5I have implemented Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention since 2020 and appreciate features like GlobalProtect VPN, but support in Saudi Arabia is slow, and overall, I rate it 3 out of 10 due to service limitations.
Senior Network Security Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for its IDS and IPS functionalities, finding it effective with a strong sandboxing tool and advanced URL filtering. However, it needs better signature granularity and expanded machine learning capabilities.
Director of Sales at S4E Serbia4.5I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention for detecting unknown attacks using machine learning, offering significant ROI and inline security without cloud reliance, though there's room for improvement in ICAP protocol support. Overall, it's a time and money-saving solution.
Security Presales Manager at Diverse4.0Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention offers comprehensive security features and good ROI, despite its high cost. However, it could improve with better AI analytics and behavioral insights while being more user-friendly due to its steep learning curve.
Senior Network Support Engineer at Amadeus4.0I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention to analyze traffic patterns and implement URL filtering. Although similar to Cisco, I need to propose adding Wildfire for enhanced security, but licensing and approval are pending for further deployment.
Network Security Engineer at Mauritius Telecom4.0I use Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention to protect servers because it's stable and highly rated by Gartner. While the product is reliable, its pricing and dashboard need improvement. Previously, I used Fortinet and Cisco solutions.