Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is IBM DOORS?

Featured IBM DOORS reviews

IBM DOORS mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of IBM DOORS in the Application Requirements Management category stands at 32.0%, down from 34.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM DOORS32.0%
Jama Connect16.2%
Jira15.4%
Other36.4%
Application Requirements Management

PeerResearch reports based on IBM DOORS reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Requirements ManagementAug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM DOORS vs JiraAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM DOORS vs Polarion RequirementsAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM DOORS vs Jama ConnectAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Jira4.115.4%91%275 interviewsAdd to research
Jama Connect3.816.2%93%16 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise31
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business296
Midsize Enterprise220
Large Enterprise958
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
8%
Government
6%
Transportation Company
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
University
4%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Construction Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
 
IBM DOORS Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Consultant - Technical Expert at Capgemini2.5No summary available
Architect at itcinfotech3.5IBM DOORS is utilized for requirement management and integrates well with third-party tools, but its compatibility issues and bulkiness can be problematic. Despite valuable features like an ASPICE template, I wish for more web-based integrations similar to Codebeamer.
Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH2.5No summary available
Senior Consultant Bip - Business Integration Partners at Business Integration Partners3.5In my experience with IBM DOORS, the tool supports DevOps adoption by enhancing project traceability and integrating with other IBM Rational tools. Its automation and traceability features are valuable, though its API and user experience need improvement.
Software Engineer at Kacst4.0We use IBM DOORS for requirement management, but face issues with unclear images, OLE objects, and import lags. We consider Windchill as an alternative, needing more features like PLM integration to decide on licensing.
Senior Software Development Engineer at eQ Technologic4.0I use IBM Rational DOORS for migrating and syncing data between systems. Its valuable features include effective data structuring and versioning. However, saving becomes slower as requirements increase, and unmodifiable absolute numbers pose challenges during data migration.
Systems engineer at Expleogroup5.0We use IBM Rational DOORS for listing requirements, appreciating its powerful yet simple design with features like unique IDs for requirements. However, it lacks a user-friendly interface, especially when managing tables and images, prompting our switch from Excel.
Senior Integration System Engineer at NATS (En Route) Plc4.0I use IBM DOORS for integrating system design requirements into a single database, linking them with stakeholders. Its strengths include centralized tracking and clarity, but it suffers from low performance and lacks flexibility compared to newer tools like Jira.