![Hitachi Tiered Storage Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/oz2tnjdteedru28f6d6m695iggdh.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 5.0 | I value its excellent data migration capabilities, especially for server transfers between storage arrays. I've used it for three years without major issues in deployment, stability, or scalability, though I'd like to see fewer failures. |
| Engineer with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I found the product easy to use, fast, and stable. Its automated migration was efficient. Initial setup was straightforward, and I received good customer and technical support. No deployment or scalability issues were encountered. |
| Senior Storage Engineer with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I find this solution stable with good migration features and GUI. Setup was straightforward, offering a 60% ROI. However, I wish it were vendor-independent, like IBM SVC, and had better technical support. |
| IT Storage Consultant with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I've used this solution for six years. It simplifies online data migration and disk swapping without business impact, saving time and cost. Setup was straightforward, with no major issues. I find it easy to deploy and use. |
| Senior SAN Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I value its transparent online volume migration, which avoids disruption and simplifies operations. It significantly improved capacity management and extended legacy system lifespan, though I wish it could migrate between arrays without virtualization. |
| SAN Systems Administrator at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | For five years, I've appreciated its fast, low-downtime data migration and straightforward setup. While virtualization improved operations, I experienced a minor performance issue and see Q-depth settings as a key improvement area. |
