Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GitHub CoPilot Logo

GitHub CoPilot Reviews

Vendor: GitHub
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

What is GitHub CoPilot?

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

Get the GitHub CoPilot Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot, ServiceNow, GitLab and more!
GitHub CoPilot is the #1 ranked solution in top AI Code Assistants solutions and #8 ranked solution in top Rapid Application Development Software. PeerSpot users give GitHub CoPilot an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. GitHub CoPilot is most commonly compared to ServiceNow: GitHub CoPilot vs ServiceNow. GitHub CoPilot is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 70% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
GitHub CoPilot
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,738 peers since 2012

Featured GitHub CoPilot reviews

Read more reviews

GitHub CoPilot mindshare

Product category:
Rapid Application Development Software
As of August 2025, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot in the Rapid Application Development Software category stands at 6.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot6.1%
Microsoft Power Apps12.5%
ServiceNow10.3%
Other71.1%
Rapid Application Development Software

PeerResearch reports based on GitHub CoPilot reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryRapid Application Development SoftwareAug 25, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub CoPilot vs Microsoft Power AppsAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub CoPilot vs ServiceNowAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Application Express (APEX)Aug 25, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
ServiceNow4.210.3%91%223 interviewsAdd to research
GitLab4.23.6%97%85 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot offers valuable features like code generation, context-aware suggestions, and seamless IDE integration. Users value time-saving capabilities, especially for generating test cases and code explanations. It enhances productivity with its ability to auto-complete code, manage vulnerabilities, and support multi-language coding. Users appreciate its context-aware insights and code suggestions, while its document generation and presentation tools simplify complex tasks. Copilot improves workflow efficiency, provides guidance, and speeds up development processes.
  • "Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."
  • "Copilot is highly recommended for everyone."
  • "Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project."

Room for Improvement

GitHub CoPilot has several areas needing improvement including cost effectiveness, language support, and accuracy of suggestions. Stability and integration across different environments are concerns, as well as providing better contextual understanding and more flexible control for users. Enhancement in debugging capability, support for non-standard code, image functionality, and automation features is needed. Simplifying API integrations, improving reporting accessibility, and refining user interface functionalities are also required. These improvements could enhance overall user satisfaction and experience with GitHub CoPilot.
  • "It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."
  • "While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections."
  • "If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."

ROI

Users observed substantial benefits from GitHub CoPilot, noting decreased production costs and improved task completion time. Many companies reported up to 500% return, although effectiveness can vary with project complexity. CoPilot enhances productivity and customer experience; time and cost savings ranged from 25% to 40%. While some found it costly for individual use, organizations saw tangible efficiencies. Challenges remain in context access, especially for lengthy queries, though CoPilot's integration improves documentation and code structure.

Pricing

Enterprise users of GitHub CoPilot express mixed views on pricing. While some find it reasonable with a tiered structure offering free and paid versions, others consider it costly. Personal licenses cost around $10 monthly, whereas professional or enterprise licenses cost $19 per user. Annual billing is preferred over monthly payments. Enterprises with GitHub enterprise licenses may get CoPilot as a free add-on. Potential discounts are available for startups or larger organizations.
  • "The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
  • "Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
  • "GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."

Popular Use Cases

GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity by providing code suggestions, automating repetitive tasks, and assisting with syntax. Users employ it for coding, developing infographics, document summarization, meeting summaries, and application development acceleration. It aids in code validation, test automation, and offers architectural input. GitHub CoPilot integrates seamlessly into environments like VS Code and IntelliJ IDE, facilitating efficient workflows. It supports developers by suggesting code snippets, detecting variables, and ensuring code quality before production.

Service and Support

GitHub CoPilot customer service and support offers varied experiences. Users find responses to feature requests delayed but note that GitHub and Microsoft are addressing issues. Some utilize Microsoft's online resources without contacting support directly, while others find the support team knowledgeable. A community and onboarding improvements are suggested. The forum and community provide strong assistance. Some report no need for support interaction, and one user found Microsoft’s support unresponsive, rating it poorly.

Deployment

Most users found GitHub CoPilot's initial setup straightforward, highlighting its simplicity and speed. Installation typically involves logging into a GitHub account, with deployment handled via automatic updates. Users appreciated seamless integration with IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains. Some encountered minor login issues, but support suggested enhancing instructions could resolve confusion. Overall, users appreciated the swift setup, minimal technical involvement, and efficient connection process, although rare technical challenges were noted, especially with firewall settings.

Scalability

Users find GitHub CoPilot's scalability promising, accommodating growth well, though it still faces occasional challenges under high traffic. Frequent ratings range from seven to nine out of ten, indicating satisfactory but improvable performance. Some users express concerns in complex coding environments and lack of response at times. Larger deployments have seen successful scalability with many users onboarded, while others highlight potential improvements in handling enterprise-level complexities. It benefits from cloud infrastructure for expansion.

Stability

Users rate GitHub CoPilot's stability between seven and ten out of ten. It operates smoothly, though some experience occasional glitches, especially with proxies or large enterprises. Users appreciate its feature set but note intermittent issues requiring alternatives. Most agree on its reliability, though not 100% perfect yet. Connectivity problems are rare, and improvements are anticipated as AI technology advances. Users acknowledge its tool assistance adds significant value but sometimes requires caution.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our GitHub CoPilot Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business147
Midsize Enterprise84
Large Enterprise528
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Government
5%
University
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Retailer
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare GitHub CoPilot with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about GitHub CoPilot

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?
  • Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
  • Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
  • Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
  • Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
  • Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.
Which benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
  • Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
  • Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
  • Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

Related questions

  • 32
Looking for recommendations for a no-code backend database for 500,000+ users - looking at CASPIO
  • 34
Help to migrate IBM Lotus Domino to another platform
  • 43
When should you use rapid application development and what are the most suitable projects for it?
  • 69
Who uses and benefits the most from rapid application development?
  • 84
Why is rapid application development important?
  • 5
When evaluating Rapid Application Development Software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 9
Why is Rapid Application Development Software important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Rapid Application Development Software
AI Code Assistants

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
ServiceNow vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
ServiceNow vs GitHub CoPilot
GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot
Microsoft Power Apps vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs GitHub CoPilot
Appian vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Appian vs GitHub CoPilot
Pega Platform vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Pega Platform vs GitHub CoPilot
Bizagi vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Bizagi vs GitHub CoPilot
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot
Mendix vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Mendix vs GitHub CoPilot
Salesforce Platform vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Salesforce Platform vs GitHub CoPilot
OutSystems vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
OutSystems vs GitHub CoPilot
Cursor vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Cursor vs GitHub CoPilot
Google Gemini AI vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Google Gemini AI vs GitHub CoPilot
Windsurf vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Windsurf vs GitHub CoPilot
Claude vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
Claude vs GitHub CoPilot
ServiceNow Now Platform vs GitHub CoPilot Logo
ServiceNow Now Platform vs GitHub CoPilot
See all alternatives
 
GitHub CoPilot Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Vice President of Products at C5i3.5I mainly use GitHub CoPilot for system architecture, test documentation, and code debugging. It saves significant time in documentation and improves code quality. While it needs better debugging capabilities, its 30% efficiency boost is valuable.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I use GitHub Copilot in VS Code for efficient code refactoring and summarization, saving time compared to previous tools like Chargebee. It integrates seamlessly, providing valuable context and suggestions. Improvement could include targeting specific lines instead of full section rewrites.
VP & GM, Client Storage at Micron Technology4.5I find GitHub Copilot helpful for code generation and explanation, although it sometimes struggles with larger code pieces and requires manual validation. Despite this, we enjoy a significant 20% ROI, enhancing our daily operations.
Software Engineer at The American College4.0I maintain my code with GitHub CoPilot using my student account, appreciating its ease of use and CI/CD integration. While it saves significant time, improvement is needed in simplifying API integrations, and personal accounts feel overpriced.
Senior Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5I use GitHub Copilot mainly for coding, finding its suggestions useful for project development and error resolution. However, it sometimes needs iteration to match my expectations, and a drag-and-drop UI would enhance its utility.
Independent Consultant at Selfemployed4.0I use GitHub Copilot to enhance code suggestions, boosting novice programmers' skills and team efficiency. Its valuable AI-driven context-aware suggestions streamline development. Improvement is needed in integrations and support for regulated sectors. The ROI is 500%, surpassing previous solutions like Appian BPM.
CEO at Aviscen4.5I primarily use GitHub Copilot for code suggestions to boost development efficiency. Its code suggestion feature stands out, and despite considering GitLab Duo, Copilot's stronger capabilities were preferred. I'm awaiting further results to assess ROI and productivity.
Director at Synechron4.5We use GitHub Copilot to boost our coding efficiency, benefiting from its code suggestions and reviews. It enhances productivity by up to 40%, but logical coding remains human-dependent. Its effectiveness relies on a robust training dataset and better Git awareness.