Appian and GitHub CoPilot are tools in the productivity enhancement space. While Appian offers a robust low-code environment, GitHub CoPilot provides superior code generation capabilities, enhancing overall programming efficiency. Appian stands out for its rapid development and stable low-code environment, which accelerates ROI despite higher pricing. GitHub CoPilot is preferred for its accessible pricing model and AI-driven code suggestions.
Features: Appian offers rapid low-code app development, robust BPM tools, and seamless integration capabilities. It supports mobile development across sectors with its efficient case management and process automation features. GitHub CoPilot provides AI-driven code suggestions, efficient test case generation, and code explanation tools for developers seeking coding efficiency.
Room for Improvement: Appian needs enhancements in UI customizability, offline mobile capabilities, and integration flexibility. Improved scalability and documentation are also desirable. GitHub CoPilot's code suggestions can sometimes be inaccurate, requiring better context integration. It needs stronger multi-language support and platform compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian offers cloud and on-premises deployment options, providing infrastructure flexibility. Customer service is generally well-received, though responsiveness could improve. GitHub CoPilot primarily focuses on cloud deployment, with average support that could be enhanced for resolving complex issues.
Pricing and ROI: Appian's higher pricing is justified by its low-code and BPM advantages, offering a rapid ROI. In contrast, GitHub CoPilot's pricing model is more competitive, with free and enterprise rates that appeal to a broader user base, making it suitable for individual and organizational productivity.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support is generally good.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Appian is scalable, but it depends on how you build your applications.
It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
I would like to see more enhancement in the user interface to allow more freedom in designing the sites and pages.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The price of Appian, on a competitive landscape, is a little bit on the higher side for companies, rating maybe a 6.5.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian also utilizes AI for business users, providing a feature called process each view, enabling business users to create their own dashboards, reports, and gain insights from their data and processes using artificial intelligence.
I can create tables, perform database-related activities, and create multiple tables.
It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.
Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.
GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.
What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
