Appian vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Appian
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (6th), Process Automation (4th), Low-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (5th)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Srimanta Pandit - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 15, 2024
Flexible, improves operational efficiency, and reduces the time taken to complete processes
The solution’s turnaround time for development is better compared to other tools. The solution enables fast development. The traceability of the processor is good. There is much more governance and regulations on the processers. The tool reduces the time of the processes by 30% to 40%. The solution’s low-code aspect has greatly impacted the development and deployment speed. One of the major reasons we are using the product is that we can reuse the modules. The developers can reuse all the modules. It enables us to make subsequent developments in less time. The prebuilt modules can be deployed within two to three weeks. The tool is very flexible. Compared to other platforms, the Appian product team was agile in quickly customizing things for us.
HappyBhalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 19, 2023
Helps with code review, test case generation, and chat features
In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results. If they could provide diagrams or basic design architectures, it would be easier to understand and take less time to review. So, as of now, image functionality is not provided by GitHub Copilot, and it would be great if they could add that. So, I would like to see improvements in the result generation, more results, different result formats, and image functionality.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."
"It has very flexible adaptation and the ability to save and automate processes."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"The product's most valuable feature is the low code aspect of development. We can develop an end-to-end VPN solution using a single platform."
"The application life cycle is very clear. I started learning it and giving some workshops to my team. Creating the users and the building is very structured. Documentation is nice and it's easy to learn."
"The tech support is quite good."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."
 

Cons

"The documentation needs to be improved."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"While Appian is generally flexible, it's rigid in some ways. It takes longer to do something that isn't available out of the box."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"There is no UI customization possible."
"It is also not easy to learn. Training tutorials could be improved."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing of Appian is less expensive when compared to other BPMs in the market."
"I'm sure it is cost-effective, but right now, we're just toying around with it. So, I don't have any hard numbers."
"The license is not very cheap. It's on the expensive side."
"The pricing can be a little confusing to customers."
"The price of the solution is reasonable and is paid annually. The price of the solution depends on how many users use the solution. It can range from $50,000 to $200,000. For example, for 20,000 users the price can be approximately $200,000."
"You can't really test the software properly without actually buying the license first."
"If you're doing an enterprise-wide digital transformation, Appian is worthwhile, but not for just one or two use cases because the license costs are higher."
"When it comes to pricing, it's definitely not affordable. However, it really depends on the requirements that you're seeking from the solution."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"It's affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
26%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?
Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. There is a whole section on their company’s website where you can check out the edu...
Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?
We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in its essence, means it is meant for business users and inexperienced beginners. So...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers. For example, with our local Comcast cable company, if you need to repair something, you go on the app. They ask, "Wha...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.