Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CockroachDB Logo

CockroachDB Reviews

Vendor: Cockroach
4.0 out of 5

What is CockroachDB?

Featured CockroachDB reviews

CockroachDB mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of CockroachDB in the Relational Databases Tools category stands at 4.1%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CockroachDB4.1%
SQL Server16.6%
Oracle Database12.9%
Other66.4%
Relational Databases Tools

PeerResearch reports based on CockroachDB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryRelational Databases ToolsAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCockroachDB vs SQL ServerAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCockroachDB vs Oracle DatabaseAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCockroachDB vs SAP HANAAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SQL Server4.216.6%93%269 interviewsAdd to research
Teradata4.15.1%87%76 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business79
Midsize Enterprise44
Large Enterprise263
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
6%
Retailer
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
University
4%
Media Company
3%
Government
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Healthcare Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Insurance Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
 
CockroachDB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used CockroachDB for two years with Hasura, valuing its scalability, resilience, and SQL features. Setup was simple, support responsive, though UI and latency can improve. Overall, it effectively supports our moderate-scale, cloud-native application needs.
Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed5.0I evaluated CockroachDB on various setups, finding it compatible with PostgreSQL protocols, which allowed easy integration with existing applications. Its extensive documentation and open-source model are valuable, though the serverless pricing can be confusing. It provides good ROI and scalability.
Student at Univerzita obrany4.0I am exploring CockroachDB and YugaByteDB for school applications, testing them alongside PostgreSQL. CockroachDB's distributed nature and geo-replication are valuable, though I wish for better PostgreSQL compatibility, especially concerning connection strings and technical integrations.
Senior Principal Architect ,Technology Strategy at Discover Financial Services4.0I find CockroachDB valuable due to its resilience and geo-partitioning features, which are essential for my company's needs. However, the automatic failover capability needs improvement. We haven't used other solutions, nor have we considered alternate cloud providers.
Chief Information Officer (CIO) at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0CockroachDB perfectly suits our legal and compliance needs, allowing us to keep EU and Singapore data isolated while maintaining global instances. Although it's not enterprise-level yet, its lower support costs and distributed nature make it valuable for us.
Staff DBRE at SecurityScorecard4.0I value CockroachDB's ability to solve data residency issues with auto geo-partitioning, reducing costs and improving performance by keeping data close to users. The engine could improve with AI to optimize partition key usage, enhancing query efficiency. Overall, it's cost-effective.
Co-Founder at Afriziki4.5I use CockroachDB for its ability to handle high-velocity data and its compatibility with Postgres. It offers valuable security features and automatic rebalancing, but it needs better extensibility and integration, particularly with tools like Kafka.
Technology Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.0I found CockroachDB valuable for its node syncing feature, which is efficient at 0.54 milliseconds. However, improvements are needed in store processes. It effectively synced our nodes but had no return on investment or considerations of alternate solutions.