Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Reviews

4.4 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)?

Featured Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) in the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) category stands at 3.9%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)3.9%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks15.3%
Netskope12.1%
Other68.7%
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

PeerResearch reports based on Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySecure Access Service Edge (SASE)Aug 25, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonCheck Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange PlatformAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonCheck Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto NetworksAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonCheck Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs NetskopeAug 25, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Fortinet FortiGate4.2N/A91%412 interviewsAdd to research
Netgate pfSense4.3N/A93%218 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business243
Midsize Enterprise128
Large Enterprise325
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Security Firm
4%
Retailer
4%
Non Profit
4%
Logistics Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Construction Company
3%
University
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Media Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Photography Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) with alternative products

Learn more about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) customers

Related questions

 
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group4.5Check Point Harmony SASE provides secure, cloud-based access for our remote workforce, combining features like Zero Trust and real-time threat intelligence. Its centralized management improves visibility, though deeper integration with third-party identity providers and enhanced analytics are needed.
Team Lead, Information Technology at Tonbo Imaging4.0I use Check Point Harmony SASE for comprehensive endpoint security, benefiting from easy device management and internet traffic segregation. Despite some bugs and slow support, it saves me time by automatically alerting me to security threats and managing endpoints smoothly.
Technical Lead at Netsmart5.0I use Check Point Harmony SASE primarily for its SSL VPN capabilities due to regulatory restrictions. The key features are stabilization, private and Internet access. Improvements in bidirectional traffic, UDP protocol, and local data centers in Turkey are needed.
System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv4.5I primarily use Check Point Harmony SASE for firewall management of my internal network. Its user interface is excellent, offering clear traffic transparency. Although connectivity can lag, time savings are substantial. Though costly, it offers a significant return on investment.
Security Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees3.5I've used Check Point Harmony SASE for three months; while its Zero Trust features and scalability are useful, it's still underdeveloped, missing key functionalities, and difficult to implement, though customer support has been excellent throughout.
Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees4.0I've used Check Point Harmony SASE for a year, appreciating its simple management and zero-trust approach, though performance may suffer on poor connections. It's user-friendly, integrates well, but can be costly and less intuitive for beginners.
IT Help Support - Coop at DistillerSR4.5I use Perimeter 81 to ensure secure remote work for our global team, valuing its user-friendly interface and quick connection reestablishment. While reporting can improve, its positive ROI, robust security features, and productivity gains make it ideal.
Enterprise Network Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees5.0I've used Check Point Harmony SASE mainly for ZTNA and Firewall as a Service to secure remote VPN users, seeing clear security improvements, though setup was complex and required user-specific fine-tuning over time.