Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 3.9% |
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 15.3% |
Netskope | 12.1% |
Other | 68.7% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Netskope | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fortinet FortiGate | 4.2 | N/A | 91% | 412 interviewsAdd to research |
Netgate pfSense | 4.3 | N/A | 93% | 218 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 40 |
Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
Large Enterprise | 15 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 243 |
Midsize Enterprise | 128 |
Large Enterprise | 325 |
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) was previously known as Check Point Quantum SASE.
Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group | 4.5 | Check Point Harmony SASE provides secure, cloud-based access for our remote workforce, combining features like Zero Trust and real-time threat intelligence. Its centralized management improves visibility, though deeper integration with third-party identity providers and enhanced analytics are needed. |
Team Lead, Information Technology at Tonbo Imaging | 4.0 | I use Check Point Harmony SASE for comprehensive endpoint security, benefiting from easy device management and internet traffic segregation. Despite some bugs and slow support, it saves me time by automatically alerting me to security threats and managing endpoints smoothly. |
Technical Lead at Netsmart | 5.0 | I use Check Point Harmony SASE primarily for its SSL VPN capabilities due to regulatory restrictions. The key features are stabilization, private and Internet access. Improvements in bidirectional traffic, UDP protocol, and local data centers in Turkey are needed. |
System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv | 4.5 | I primarily use Check Point Harmony SASE for firewall management of my internal network. Its user interface is excellent, offering clear traffic transparency. Although connectivity can lag, time savings are substantial. Though costly, it offers a significant return on investment. |
Security Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | I've used Check Point Harmony SASE for three months; while its Zero Trust features and scalability are useful, it's still underdeveloped, missing key functionalities, and difficult to implement, though customer support has been excellent throughout. |
Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I've used Check Point Harmony SASE for a year, appreciating its simple management and zero-trust approach, though performance may suffer on poor connections. It's user-friendly, integrates well, but can be costly and less intuitive for beginners. |
IT Help Support - Coop at DistillerSR | 4.5 | I use Perimeter 81 to ensure secure remote work for our global team, valuing its user-friendly interface and quick connection reestablishment. While reporting can improve, its positive ROI, robust security features, and productivity gains make it ideal. |
Enterprise Network Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees | 5.0 | I've used Check Point Harmony SASE mainly for ZTNA and Firewall as a Service to secure remote VPN users, seeing clear security improvements, though setup was complex and required user-specific fine-tuning over time. |