Azure Site Recovery Reviews

Name: Azure Site Recovery
Brand: Microsoft
Rating: 4.0 (24 reviews)

Vendor: Microsoft

4.0 out of 5

24 reviews
92% willing to recommend

106 followers

Start review

What is Azure Site Recovery?

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Get the Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery, Commvault Cloud, VMware Live Recovery and more!

Azure Site Recovery is the #2 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery as a Service providers. PeerSpot users give Azure Site Recovery an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Azure Site Recovery is most commonly compared to Commvault Cloud: Azure Site Recovery vs Commvault Cloud. Azure Site Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 60% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Featured Azure Site Recovery reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

Mike Douthitt

Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net

Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Peter Maklin Aquino

Project manager at Lapanday Foods Corporation

Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems. Setting up the sync was easy, and when disaster recovery was triggered, ASR automatically ensured seamless replication of files from the primary to the secondary server. With just a click, this feature simplified and expedited the entire process, providing a reliable solution for maintaining data consistency between servers during recovery events.

Read full review

Azure Site Recovery mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category stands at 23.9%, down from 24.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery as a Service

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Site Recovery reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Disaster Recovery as a Service	May 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Azure Site Recovery vs Commvault Cloud	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Azure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service	May 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Commvault Cloud	4.3	12.3%	95%	110 interviews Add to research
VMware Live Recovery	4.1	25.3%	88%	80 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Azure Site Recovery offers features such as seamless failover, fast environment snapshots, user-friendly interface, scalability, cost-effectiveness, secure and reliable performance, and comprehensive reporting and dashboards. Its automated file synchronization and load balancing are game-changers for managing legacy systems. The ease of migration and synchronization support for VMs make Azure Site Recovery popular among entities, enabled by its native integration with Azure services and automation for enhanced data consistency and recovery efficiency.

"The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."
"Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery is obviously a time-saving solution, and I can write PowerShell scripts to automate failover on or off processes."

Room for Improvement

Azure Site Recovery needs better error logging and pricing adjustments. Users desire improvements in security features, hypervisor integration, and support speed. The service should enhance synchronization, versioning, patch management, and clearer billing. Real-time scanning, stability, multi-location replication, ease of use, and advanced automation are also sought after. Compatibility with more operating systems and platforms, as well as predictability in usage costs, would increase satisfaction among users.

"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."
"There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages."
"Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services."

ROI

Azure Site Recovery delivers a favorable return as it simplifies processes and enhances reliability. It outperforms alternatives by saving time and reducing the need for additional infrastructure. Automating tasks allows businesses to save significant resources and time in backup and restoration. Despite being costlier than some services, Azure Site Recovery's service level justifies its price. Some smaller companies use it as a precautionary measure without calculating specific returns.

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery's pricing varies based on factors like storage, network traffic, and resource usage. Many users find it reasonably priced but suggest simplifying its component-based licensing. Monthly costs are often cited, with some users paying about $225 for site-to-site replication. Opinions on affordability are mixed, with some viewing it as affordable and others as costly for extensive setups. Microsoft's frequent pricing restructuring can pose challenges for accurately estimating costs, requiring adjustments to packages and subscriptions.

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Azure Site Recovery primarily for disaster recovery and business continuity. Many companies rely on it for backing up and replicating on-premises data to Azure, ensuring critical systems can be restored in the event of failures. Additionally, it's utilized for data migrations, compliance, testing, and maintaining uptime. Various sectors, including healthcare and insurance, benefit from its functionalities for seamless operations and minimizing downtime during disruptions.

Service and Support

Azure Site Recovery customer support is varied. Many find the support helpful and efficient, while others feel response times are long and communication lacks professionalism. Some rate support high, praising quick resolutions and expert assistance, especially when partners are involved. However, non-partner users experience a cumbersome ticket process. Technical support ratings range widely, highlighting inconsistency. Several report that Microsoft support is inadequate, with slow resolutions and failures in delivering expertise on complex issues.

Deployment

Azure Site Recovery's initial setup is straightforward for many users, though experience and infrastructure can influence complexity. While some found it easy, especially with a familiar user interface, others experienced challenges with documentation and hardware requirements. Deployment duration varied, with smaller environments completing in hours and larger setups requiring days or months for synchronization. Adequate expertise and team involvement proved beneficial, with many valuing additional vendor support and prior cloud experience.

Scalability

Azure Site Recovery is highly scalable. Users appreciate its flexibility for both small and large enterprises. While some see room for improvement, many note its effectiveness without size limitations and rate it between seven to ten out of ten. Whether managing a few servers or many, Azure Site Recovery supports diverse needs, from disaster recovery to seamless failover testing. The number of users can range from a handful to several hundred within organizations.

Stability

Many users consider Azure Site Recovery stable, frequently rating its reliability between seven to ten out of ten. Some report infrequent issues or situational instability, yet others experienced consistently high stability during multiple tests. They highlight no major crashes, bugs, or glitches, acknowledging its efficacy while noting potential difficulties in transitioning from existing systems. Its capability to function without downtime is frequently praised, making it a dependable choice for many organizations.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.