Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs Modulo Risk Manager vs RSA Archer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Governance category, the mindshare of Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Modulo Risk Manager is 0.6%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 34.1%, up from 33.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Governance
 

Featured Reviews

WW
Good automation and analytics, but is costly
The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing reports that meet the expectations of our clients and customers. It would be beneficial if the focus could be shifted toward improving the reporting aspect. The impact report is a crucial aspect, as we only have one opportunity to create it. Galvanize HighBond can improve by generating more impact reports post-project, and allowing access to the reports using a web version, which would greatly benefit us. The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement.
Use Modulo Risk Manager?
Share your opinion
IMRAN ALMARZOOQI - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates compliance management effectively but needs improved interface and dashboards
The tool basically automates whatever processes you already have, so I cannot specify improvements in that regard. However, my main issue with Archer is the graphics. The graphics have always been lacking. I always need to depend on another tool to read information from Archer to have better dashboards. It is like using Linux, and it has a Linux mindset and interface. I want to use Archer for top management and CEOs, but it looks too technical, and the dashboards are not really friendly. They are bulky, like opening an old Nintendo system from nineteen-ninety. The management agrees that Archer lacks in terms of presentation and dashboarding. It is complex, not user-friendly, and bulky. The interface just looks old.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Governance solutions are best for your needs.
851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
37%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
Educational Organization
44%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RSA Archer?
It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks h...
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
If the user needs to fill data, they need to go to one page and then to the next page if they can reduce the number o...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
I perform all of our information security management governance and risk -related activities through Archer. My organ...
 

Also Known As

Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize , Diligent GRC Platform
No data available
Archer
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CNA Insurance
Lafarge, Xerox Brasil, IBM, PennState, Univision, Fifa World Cup Brasil, Synovus, Eletrobras, Grey group, Microsoft, Apex Brasil
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance. Updated: April 2025.
851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.