No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Why PeerSpot?

Gartner Magic Quadrant: Riverbed Continues to Lead WOC Market, but with Uneven Execution

Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
VP Product at PeerSpot
  • 24
Published:Apr 26, 2015
Search for a product comparison
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Learn what your peers think about Steelhead. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
CH
Network Engineer at TIAA
May 8, 2023
May 8, 2023
Hi Charles, Are you looking at integrating Steelhead into your current network or replacing it with an alternative?
See 1 answer
SS
Consultant at Edge Tech Providers
May 8, 2023
Hi Charles,  Are you looking at integrating Steelhead into your current network or replacing it with an alternative?
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Director at PeerSpot
Mar 5, 2025
Mar 5, 2025
Steelhead is considered an expensive solution in our country. On a scale of one to ten for expense, it would be rated an eight.
2 out of 8 answers
Djurre Woudstra - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at a legal firm with 201-500 employees
Jan 23, 2021
The solution is expensive and the service contacts are costly too. The cost of the device makes the value proposition borderline acceptable for us. The service contract fees we pay is approximately $30,000 annually.
JOHNOKUNADE - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Support Engineer at Nigeria LNG Limited
Aug 18, 2021
The cost of the product is too high. We would like it to be lower. We pay a yearly licensing fee.
Explore this product
Download Free Report
Download our free Steelhead Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.