What advice do you have for others considering Splunk Enterprise Security?

I do not have additional data for providing more detailed advice. My overall rating for this solution is eight.

For any user who wants to have a cost-efficient and next-gen SIEM solution, I wouldn't recommend Splunk Enterprise Security. However, if a user is not concerned about cost and is looking for an on-premises solution, then I would suggest Splunk Enterprise Security. For anyone who wants to go for a cloud and cost-effective solution with next-gen capability, I wouldn't recommend this. I would rate it a seven out of ten.

I am reviewing Splunk Enterprise Security today, and I am working on one simple product and creating simple SPL. My thoughts on customizing, developing, testing, deploying, and refining detections are focused on detection. The testing is just the last component. My thoughts on the testing feature in Splunk Enterprise Security involve the network traffic to Cisco traffic, Uniper, or low car infrastructure. I am using new threat detection features in Splunk Enterprise Security and would work on big projects in the future. I do not use disparate security solutions that integrate or import data into Splunk Enterprise Security. I am wanting to learn more because I create simple SPL, and my friends are not Splunk Enterprise Security expert admins. I would recommend Splunk Enterprise Security to other users because it is a platform for monitoring all traffic, network infrastructure, hardware, software, and everything. I rate the solution overall as a five out of ten.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I know that our SOC team does use Splunk Enterprise Security to prioritize and investigate high-fidelity alerts, however, I'm not sure how it helps them specifically. I can say that many different teams in the business use it very heavily. We do utilize UEBA in our company, yet not Splunk Enterprise Security UEBA from my understanding. I'm not part of those teams, so I wouldn't have an answer for how it specifically functions. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a ten out of ten. I advise other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security to recognize that it is utilized by massive companies and is more practical. I would suggest finding what works for their environment and evaluating all related costs as those are important factors. Overall, Splunk Enterprise Security delivers, which is what truly matters.

I would advise other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security to use it and also utilize the built-in ES Content Pack, where you have many rules ready, instead of trying to figure everything out. Use that content pack to start, and once you have the basic fundamental detection rules, then you can expand on it. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

The most significant challenge I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection is alert fatigue. Although there are ways to mitigate it, it remains a persistent issue, as evidenced by complaints from analysts. While alert fatigue is alleviated to some extent, it still persists. My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to at least give it a try; I know there are other solutions in the market, some of which may even be better than Enterprise Security, however, you have everything on a single pane of glass, so I think it's definitely something that enterprises should test. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

My advice for other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that if they're looking to enhance their security visibility or establish a security operation center, this tool is an excellent starting point, and they can scale and automate processes using SOAR effectively. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution an eight.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization's business resilience. It helps us respond to various needs in our different regions or plants, aiming to obtain critical information to reduce the impact of hacks in our plants. I would absolutely recommend Splunk Enterprise Security. Every time I have the opportunity to promote or explain how it works, people say it is amazing, and I agree. It is an integrated solution that stands out against competitors, and though it may be expensive, it delivers good quality. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall a nine on a scale of one to ten, considering the current improvements.

For the future of Splunk Enterprise Security, I would want the Edge Processor to be able to send to multiple destinations rather than just Splunk, though that is more about Observability. The advice I would give to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that everybody wants to drive a Ferrari, so get the Ferrari of SIMs. I rate Splunk Enterprise Security ten out of ten.

We just started turning on UEBA in our company, but we haven't really started utilizing it yet. There is a roadmap to try to do some of that stuff from the program side, and we just have to get access to it once the enterprise is ready to implement it and hand it over to the program office. Even though we just started using UEBA, it's very useful, and it helps us set a bar for what normal activity is, and then it sets alerts and gives us awareness for anything that's out of the norm in terms of normal user behavior and the data that's being accessed. My advice to other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that you should definitely look into it, get your folks a proof of concept and try it out, send folks to training, and let them learn about it, and see how it can help you be better at securing your environment. I rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of ten.

I am not directly involved in pushing new detection in Splunk Enterprise Security. However, I do tune detections; if a detection is firing too much or I feel we could edit the detection, I find it quite easy to do. My organization does not use risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security yet; we're working on it. The advice I would give to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to contact them, contact the sales rep, the tech rep, and ask them for a PoC trial. They're very open with this and even with new features. Before we buy anything new, such as SOAR, Splunk offers us to do a PoC. They give us a license to try it for free for a few months and give feedback if interested or not. For any enterprise thinking about it, I would contact them and get them to do a free trial for a while. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to weigh their options, but I would definitely recommend it. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

I rate this product seven out of ten. Nothing is perfect, and there is still room for improvement.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to follow the documentation and not build your own stuff. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution a nine.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that while not everyone needs the top breed, ensure you have the resources and time to invest in it if you decide to use it. Anything off the shelf won't be as valuable as something you invest in and put time into, so the more you put in, the more you get out. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall as probably an eight out of ten; it is industry-leading.

The advice I would give to other companies that are considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that if you've never used Splunk, it can be a little daunting at first, learning a new language, Splunk SPL. That said, it's worth it. The cycle time that's going to be taken in training and upskilling, once your staff is familiar with that, and you don't even have to do a lot of training, just a couple of the basic classes from Splunk University to get proficient, it's going to open a lot of doors. On a scale of one out of ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security handles problems in real-time. When rating Splunk Enterprise Security overall, I'd give it a nine out of ten. I appreciate that it has a good UI that looks good and works well. I would recommend Splunk Enterprise Security.

My advice to other organizations considering using Splunk Enterprise Security is to do your homework. Attend industry peer sessions and learn from other organizations. Splunk's partner program, RBA Community offer compelling resources for new customers. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I'd give Splunk Enterprise Security a rating of ten out of ten. My advice to other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to just do it. Don't look at any of the competitors; Splunk, hands down, is the product that I would recommend to other companies.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that it's the leader in SIEM globally. You have a lot of customization and data normalization, meaning you can detect anything you want compared to other SIEMs. Splunk Enterprise Security is worth the investment because it provides exactly what you need if you are a true cyber defender. I also network with friends from a company, Next-Gen Systems, which is leading in detection and investing in developments and integrations with Splunk due to its scalability. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security a ten.

The advice I would give to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to work with professional services. It's a large undertaking for your SOC, so work with professional services that have seen different examples and situations and lean on their expertise to help you develop the right solution. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall on a scale of one to ten as probably about an eight; there's still some work to be done, however, it's the best that we can do right now.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that it is definitely worth implementing, but it must be done properly. Make sure you have all preparations complete before getting the implementation package. I rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten.

In our strategy to combat insider threats and advanced persistent threats, Splunk Enterprise Security plays an important role with its UEBA features, helping us identify outliers from baseline behavior that assists in detecting anomalies or insider threats that may otherwise slip through traditional defenses. I advise organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security to proceed if you are already a big Splunk shop with an underlying platform deployed, as it seamlessly integrates with your existing data and allows easy onboarding of additional technologies within the Splunk ecosystem without additional overhead. Considering the overall performance, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security as an eight out of ten, recognizing it as a powerful platform within our SOC toolkit.

The most significant challenges I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection relate to the RBA, which is something that we were struggling with. We are working with the SIM and our reseller to streamline that process. That's something that's not easy for every organization. We are going through the same turbulence. My organization does not completely utilize risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security as it's not fully mature. It is supporting our SOC in a limited way. We still have a long way to go. The product is not completely mature. We are a unique organization, so it requires additional resources to get that work done. My organization is in the process of expanding our security use cases. It's a multi-year model where we are strategizing and exploring all our security needs. I would say we are still in the early phase. Although we have the product in place, it was not yet mature due to some resource issues. My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that it's a good product. It's definitely helpful. If somebody is looking for security and log management, investigations, incident, and IRP, then they can look into this product and explore it. It's one of the market-leading products. It definitely stays up to the mark. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution an eight.

Regarding whether Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to ingest and normalize data from diverse sources has enhanced our threat detection capabilities, it is based on a system we have, and since we have a SIM, the data is already segmented coming in. In terms of whether Splunk Enterprise Security has helped reduce our team's average meantime to detect, it's still very early in the rollout phase. I can say that as time goes along, it's a bit quicker and has sped up, however, we haven't yet gotten any specific metrics. We haven't used UEBA, but we've used UBA, which is what the system is based on. There's Splunk UBA and then there's Splunk UEBA, which is integrated into Splunk Enterprise Security. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. My advice to other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to avoid setting it up as a separate test system. It's crucial to integrate it into your main system because one of the main issues we've faced is managing the amount of data and understanding that you want to feed it as much data as you can.

My organization uses risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security, which supports our SOC by negating through false positives. On a scale of one to 10, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

We use multiple best-of-breed products to provide data to Splunk Enterprise Security for correlation and malicious activity determination. My organization does not use risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security. We use third parties for threat detection features. Splunk Enterprise Security's impact on business resilience is unclear as we use it exclusively for cyber purposes. My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to use it. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution a nine.

The most significant challenges I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection are that it takes some time to get the hang of the platform, and it has a slight learning curve associated with it. Other than that, I have no complaints. The advice I would give to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to try it out and see if it fits their requirements. It's highly flexible, highly customizable, and can scale according to needs. On our rating scale, I give Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that unless you're really big, don't spend the money. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution an eight.

I would advise other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security that the new version looks impressive. If organizations want the new, complete package, I would recommend ES Premier, as it combines ES with TIM, UEBA, and SOAR. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a seven. I believe ES is doing its job, but it is slightly behind its competitors. Other competitor platforms already have AI integrated, and they just announced it today, so it feels somewhat behind. However, I am looking forward to this new feature.

The biggest advice I would give to anybody considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to understand what you want your organization to look like. What kind of things do you need your SOC to do? If you're just looking at doing basic auditing and alerting and reporting, there are features you can use. If you're wanting to do more threat hunting and incident response and go from ordinary to extraordinary, there are many features Splunk will help you utilize. It's really important that you understand what you want your SOC's identity to look like. As you partner and do your proof of value with Splunk, you can focus on those features that align to your immediate needs, as those you're curious about growing into, where you might see your organization in the next one year, two year, three year, five year type of journey and how those features really align, knowing that you've got a partner that's going to allow you to happily exist where you're at, yet also support you on the growth where you're wanting to go. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

The advice I would give to other organizations who are considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to just do it. It's honestly one of the best investments you'll make. You'll start noticing the return on investment really quick. You'll start to notice answers that you did not know you had to questions that didn't exist. You'll start to notice your meantime to detect goes down as you start implementing RBA and embracing the Splunk base itself. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a solid ten. It answers questions you didn't even know you had, and as you drill through the dashboards and go through the different features that are available, you start to realize all this available information that's there that you didn't even know your data had those answers to. It really starts bringing that value within your first 30 days of using it.

The features that have been demoed and debuted in Splunk Enterprise Security are of particular interest, and I'm interested to see where that journey continues. I find the process for customizing, developing, testing, deploying, and refining detections in Splunk Enterprise Security relatively easy with training. My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to try it. I would suggest getting a demo from Splunk as that's the worthwhile approach. It's better to see all the powers that this tool can bring in terms of those capacities rather than trying to figure it out on your own journey. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. The only reason for this rating is, from an outside-in perspective, as someone who hasn't spent time either deploying it themselves or learning more of the nuances of how clustered designs work, it can be an intimidating experience and requires a lot of hand-holding. This creates a barrier to adoption.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to make sure you understand all the functionality of it, not just what they show you, but also the integration points; understand the automation side of it and get a good holistic understanding before making a decision. On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution a seven out of ten.

The most significant challenges I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection are related to the data. Onboarding the data, trying to get only what we want and what matters for security is a challenge every day. We're trying to onboard what matters and what is significant for security. We use Splunk solely for security purposes. Some people see Splunk as a data analytics tool, which it is, but changing people's minds that we use Splunk for security is an everyday challenge. I am not using any new threat detection features in Splunk Enterprise Security currently. My impressions of its ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real time are good, even though we don't use many things out of the box. We use most of the out-of-the-box features and customize them. We have just a few out-of-the-box use cases in place. The advice I would give to other organizations considering it is to send people to training before getting Splunk Enterprise Security. You can use my real name when publishing my review. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine.

My organization does not use risk-based alerting yet. My security ops team takes 60 or 70% longer to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to our previous solution. The advice I would give to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to design, design, design, and design. Expanding on what that means, you need to be very organized with what you want and what you want to achieve from the product because the deployment is very crucial; once you install it, it's very hard to change the topology and to add more tenants or search heads, which is very complex. The vendor can contact me with any questions or comments about my review. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall an eight.

I would advise other organizations to consider Splunk Enterprise Security as it's an easy solution to implement and effective for its intended purpose. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

The most significant challenges I've faced when using Splunk include getting the code right. I find the process for customizing, developing, testing, deploying, and refining detections in Splunk Enterprise Security to be good, as changes are easy to make. On average, my security ops team takes about three days to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security, depending on what the incident is. My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that it depends on their needs and costs, but I think it can cover everything from a small business to a large business, so I would definitely recommend it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an 8.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to try it if you don't know about it yet. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall as an eight. Sometimes it is a bit hard to get the searches and the data done, but all in all, it's a great product.

Splunk Enterprise Security can make mistakes, so we do not solely rely on the out-of-the-box detections. It can also be part of a hybrid or multi-cloud environment. Everything depends on who teaches you Splunk Enterprise Security. Someone can teach you, and it becomes simple, or it can become complex. To me, it is not complex as I am experienced in using Splunk Enterprise Security. I utilize Splunk Enterprise Security to analyze and conduct investigations as part of my job. There is minimal intrusion, so I receive few alerts regarding malicious threats. We do not have a partnership with them; we use it as a normal user through the internet. Regarding sustainability, manufacturers must continually update their products, add new features, and optimize them. They need to optimize extensively because with threats and vulnerabilities, we always have to update to the latest features. Overall, when it comes to performance and reliability, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security higher due to its user-friendliness. That is something on top of my list. Splunk Enterprise Security is on top in terms of how users or administrators can manage it. Everything else looks pretty fine regarding the support we get from Splunk Enterprise Security. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall as eight out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security has approximately seven different AI capabilities. These include natural language processing for search query assistance, machine learning for alerts and data processing, and plugins such as Tensor for external AI processing. However, I remain cautious about enabling all AI features without understanding their performance impact. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten.

This product requires significant investment in learning as it is not easily understood. Organizations purchasing the solution should expect 6-12 months with a dedicated team before meaningful insights can be delivered. On a scale from one to ten, Splunk Enterprise Security rates as a seven.

I am preparing my master's degree and conducting this review for completing it at KFUPM University, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, located in Saudi Arabia, to prepare for my defense. I have experience with blue team tools, specifically Splunk Enterprise Security and some other solutions. The company name is Cyberani Solutions, and my email is first name dot last name at cyberanisolutions.com. PeerSpot will create an account and email the login credentials, and my feedback will be published and possibly shared with third parties if I choose to not remain anonymous. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

On Splunk Enterprise Security, we imported from the content library, specifically from the content management page that contains many rules; we are importing rules from there, enabling rules, and editing them. I'm not a deep down administrator of Splunk Enterprise Security, so I'm not arranging the data models. I'm mostly editing the rules. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten.

I participated in the deployment process of Splunk Enterprise Security, and we performed UAT before moving it to production. It's not the most affordable solution, as I've witnessed several companies considering leaving due to cost factors. The pricing of Splunk Enterprise Security is not very affordable, and I have seen many companies planning to leave because of cost concerns.

We are currently using Splunk Enterprise Security for our SOC in our office, and as long as the office continues its use, we will still be using it. I haven't faced any other difficulties apart from the CPU resource issues. I find Splunk Enterprise Security to be very customizable and user-friendly. The only consideration is that if we want to increase the volume of logs processed, we need to buy more licenses. Maintaining Splunk Enterprise Security requires personnel, especially due to the existence of different search heads and various forwarders in our robust setup, supporting a centralized logging environment. I find it easy to scale Splunk Enterprise Security for our environment, and I would recommend that potential users consider their capacity to invest financially based on the criticality of their infrastructure, as adoption comes with licensing costs. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

Instead of going for the cheapest solution available, you should go for the one that meets your needs. It takes time for an organization to onboard a new solution, so it is important to choose the right solution from the start. I believe all available solutions are pretty good, so you should see what suits you better. It is a great tool. If you learn to navigate it, you can access a wide range of information about any application or product. It is a very helpful tool, provided you know how to use it. Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Splunk has disadvantages such as cost and resource requirements. However, once I invest, it's a powerful platform that ranks number one in SIEM and observability. I rate the product nine out of ten due to pricing concerns and threat intelligence management not being advanced. I believe Splunk is the top SIEM tool. However, the term "enterprise security" is misused when applied to Splunk. While many vendors claim to offer "enterprise security," true enterprise security should cover all aspects of cybersecurity. Splunk excels in SIEM, SOAR, and UEBA, but it doesn't address other crucial areas like firewalls, PAM, or web/mail gateways. Therefore, Splunk shouldn't be categorized as an "enterprise security" solution. Although Splunk leads in SIEM with its superior visibility and observability, it lacks presence in other essential cybersecurity domains.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of ten. Splunk Enterprise Security requires continuous maintenance and support, which requires a dedicated team. Previously, seven to eight personnel were focused on platform maintenance. Additional resources may be required to optimize for multiple customer environments. For those evaluating SIEM solutions solely based on cost, Splunk might not be suitable. It is essential to consider security, context, and specific use cases rather than just choosing based on price. Critical assets need the right platform for effective protection rather than opting for a cheaper solution.

Overall, Splunk is among the top three SIEM tools due to its capabilities and agility in bridging business analytics with security needs. They very much deserve where they stand on the Gartner Magic Quadrant. I like it a lot better than ArcSight, which was owned by HP at one point or another. In comparison to that, Splunk is much more agile and quick. It comes from a business analytics perspective. It is a lot easier to build the bridge between the business and security based on that platform. As far as stability and scalability are concerned, it is a brilliant solution. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of 10. If you want to use Splunk, you can try the free version, which goes up to half a gig. You can feed a log from the Active Directory. If you take that information directly from Active Directory, it will be hard to read. Splunk provides a good dashboard. Splunk is an excellent choice for an organization that needs a fully scalable and highly customizable solution. We can customize the dashboard to combine all the device logs. Unfortunately, others still need to learn how to do that. It depends on an organization's needs and resources because it's not cheap. It's on the higher end of pricing, which can be a significant factor for small organizations with budget constraints. It's more appropriate for the enterprise level and companies with over 500 employees.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security seven out of ten.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of 10.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten. Splunk Enterprise Security is easy to maintain and doesn't require much time due to its full automation. Splunk is a good solution if you haven't automated your log management, as manual log reviews are no longer efficient or practical.

The solution helps us see what's actually happening in our environment. Some things we might not expect at times, and others we do expect. The tool helps us respond based on what we see from our logs. I've seen and thoroughly liked some AI, automation, and single-pane-of-glass updates coming to the solution. It is very important to our organization that Splunk Enterprise Security provides end-to-end visibility into our environment. You can't respond to what you can't see was ingested. So, the visibility provided by the tool into our logs and alerting environment is critical. From an ingestion point of view, the solution alerts you to what you'd tell it to. It's pretty agnostic log-wise. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization’s ability to ingest and normalize data. It has helped reduce our alert volume. You're getting the same alerts. You can see what's noise, what's actionable, and what's not as actionable. Splunk Enterprise Security provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. We see what's coming into the environment, including specific logs that we wouldn't expect as much. All of that gets filtered into alert data, potentially operational data, and sometimes even billing data, so we can adjust and move forward with that in the environment. Splunk Enterprise Security helped reduce your mean time to resolve by somewhere between 20% to 35%. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization's business resilience for some ingestion purposes. The unified platform helps consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools. Splunk is pretty log-agnostic. All of your logs, tools, and sometimes even dashboards can get ingested into one specific tool. That way, you have a single platform where you can view all those logs and respond based on that data. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security is really strong, capable, and great at what it does. There are obvious areas of improvement, but it looks like Splunk has already identified them and is working on road maps to enhance SOAR integration and AI digital assistance for Splunk Enterprise Security. Once those are fully implemented, the product will further improve. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security is just a tool you can use, and then it's really up to the customer how they leverage it best. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. It is an amazing tool that provides so much visibility and streamlines so much. The main issues I have encountered with Splunk are the difficulties in configuration and keeping everything up to date as the data sources change.

I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

There is a threat intelligence management feature. However, customers don't use it in our case. Typically, customers want something superior in that nature. Price is a major concern for most customers, big or small. However, price should not be the determining factor when seeking a solution. Users need to think about performance and quality. They need something that will help them prevent security incidents, and they need a product that will be stable. If you can monitor your environment better, you can prevent incidents that may lead to financial loss - and when incidents happen, companies can spend far more dealing with an extended phishing attack than they would on a service like Splunk that will protect them effectively. When it comes to security, while it's not necessary to have the most expensive solution on the market, you should at least seek out a solution that's best suited to your company and its needs. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a great option for enterprise-level companies. However, a smaller customer with a smaller budget may not be a good match. They may not need such a powerful solution in any case. That said, if a customer is about to grow a lot, I might suggest Splunk as a primary option. I'd advise potential users to look at the environment size and complexity, consider the budget, and then decide if Splunk makes sense.

The end-to-end visibility the tool provides is not that big of a deal. They have so many tools that can do that kind of part. Splunk doesn't have to be the one place for total visibility, but at least for visibility when it consolidates on threats. Splunk has helped improve our organization's ability to ingest and normalize data. The tool pretty much consumes everything that we have. Everything from dozens of different vendor products gets ingested into Splunk. Splunk Enterprise Security is just that one central place where everything goes. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped speed up our security investigations. Something that requires someone to work on it at the beginning of the day would not take more than 15 minutes with Splunk Enterprise Security. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The tool provides much more insight into what users and our apps do. We also use the solution to monitor a lot of machine-to-machine traffic. We have a hybrid environment. All of our internal tooling is in our internal data centers, but we also have a big cloud presence for some of our other tooling and mostly for our customers. Speaking from the internal side, Splunk Enterprise Security has been fantastic in helping us find all kinds of security events every day. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization's ability to ingest and normalize data. The solution has helped us have everything in one place and grab everything at once. The tool has also helped us solve problems in real time. The Ops team will approach us when they are stuck with a problem ticket. We can look instantly, see what's happening, and track it down. The solution provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. This context information makes things easier and faster for us. We get more information about exactly what's going on. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped us save around 50% of our time. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped reduce our mean time to resolve by 50%. Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security provides end-to-end visibility into an environment, but it is not our use case currently. Splunk Enterprise Security does not really provide the relevant context to help guide our investigations because, in our country, Splunk is not represented, so it is pretty hard to get the relevant information. Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a seven out of ten. Its pricing is not good, and the learning curve for machine learning is not good. However, the parts that are working are working very well.

I work in cybersecurity consultation. I'd recommend the product to others. I'd rate the solution overall 9 out of 10.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten. Splunk is widely used across larger organizations. While large organizations often have extensive teams dedicated to Splunk projects and upgrades, smaller organizations can also use Splunk, taking advantage of more affordable pricing options like the free tier for limited data. Cost isn't a significant concern for larger organizations, who prioritize Splunk's security features and are willing to invest in its capabilities. Splunk Enterprise Security is deployed across all departments, processing millions of data points. Over 500 people manage this data: building dashboards and reports, working with Enterprise Security, discussing use cases, and creating custom data models. This represents a massive effort for any large organization where every department utilizes Splunk. Government departments are transitioning to Splunk, with daily onboarding increasing the current user base of 5,000. Because the deployment is cloud-based, the Splunk DevOps team handles maintenance. Splunk offers a resilient SIEM solution with comprehensive capabilities for research and a wide range of use cases. It is constantly updated, ensuring it remains a valuable and comprehensive SIEM package. I recommend Splunk Enterprise Security. It is an excellent tool widely used by many organizations, making it a valuable choice for security information and event management.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security 8 out of 10. I would recommend Splunk to others. It's one of the most powerful tools available. It's a valuable tool for monitoring infrastructure.

I would recommend Splunk Enterprise Security to anyone who is looking for a similar solution. This is the only solution with all these features. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a 9 out of 10. It is stable, user-friendly, and feature-rich. It is very helpful. Even though it is expensive, the stability, support, and technical documentation make it very effective.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten. For someone who wants to use the cheapest solution, I would tell them that this is the best solution and worth the cost. I recommend Splunk Enterprise Security to others.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

For the market I focus on, which includes small to medium-sized companies, I would recommend Wazuh. It's an open-source security information and event management solution. The main consideration is that, in terms of both functionality and cost, Wazuh is sufficient for the requirements of smaller enterprises. Utilizing an open-source tool like Wazuh can effectively cover the necessary areas without the need for the higher costs associated with Splunk. I would recommend that anyone considering implementing Splunk should first thoroughly assess their environment. It's crucial to determine whether Splunk is genuinely needed for your specific usage scenario or if a smaller software solution might suffice. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

If you are willing to invest in engineering effort, Splunk Enterprise Security provides excellent visibility into multiple environments, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid setups. While some solutions may require less effort, Splunk is capable and versatile, making it a strong choice for comprehensive visibility across diverse IT environments. Assessing threat detection capabilities in Splunk Enterprise Security is like evaluating how easy it is to drive a car. It provides powerful tools, but mastering the query language for utilizing these features requires effort. Once you know how to use them, it becomes an effective tool for detecting unknown threats and monitoring user behavior. I use the Splunk Mission Control feature, which is highly important to my security operations. It is particularly valuable for multi-tenant and multi-site mission control scenarios. The Splunk Mission Control feature is effective for centralizing threat intelligence and ticketing system data when dealing with a single entity or group. However, its usefulness diminishes when managing multiple customers with diverse policies and groups. The features in Splunk for discovering the overall scope of an incident, including the topography aspect, are considered industry standards. However, the topography feature is not particularly useful in my case, so I don't extensively use it. Splunk Enterprise Security is effective for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches, especially if you invest the effort. However, newer solutions are considered better and more flexible. While Splunk was an industry leader five years ago, today, platforms like Microsoft Sentinel may outshine it in terms of ease of use, especially for users unfamiliar with Splunk. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped me detect threats faster compared to other solutions. It stands out in terms of speed and effectiveness. My advice to others is that if you are looking for the cheapest solution, Splunk may not be the right choice. Consider alternatives like LogPoint or Arctic Wolf, but be cautious as they might not offer the quality and capabilities needed for effective security. Sometimes it is better to invest in a more robust solution than settling for a cheap option that might not meet your requirements. Overall, I would rate the solution as a six out of ten, mostly because of its pricing.

Cost and vegetative growth in the medium/long term. It is a great tool but you have to be careful in storing a lot of data (without any criteria). Use it as an "smart-data/small-data repository", not as a "raw centralizer, stage-area or pure-SIEM". The quantity of "use-case" is not so big when compared with others tools (and for example, you dont have specific use-cases divided by industry-segments". Before choose any tool and define your BOC (Business Operation Center), read about datamart/datawarehouse concepts and models (design and archicture too) defended by Inmon & Kimball. You'll saving a lot of $ in future.

Make sure it fits your use case. Be clear about what you want to achieve, get out of the product, and how you want to integrate it. Once you tie the solution into your systems, it is not trivial or easy to walk away from. Therefore, due diligence needs to be made to understand what your requirements are before choosing a product. Some companies may not even want to host, and prefer to go the managed services route. We have it integrated with every product that I can think of. We use both the AWS and on-premise versions. The AWS hosted version typically caters to all the microservices that we run on AWS, so there is a clear segregation between on-premise and cloud. In terms of usability and experience, both of them have been similar. We have seen a few bottlenecks on the cloud, but that can probably be attributed more on the user side of the house in terms of the way we write our applications and the type of payloads that we sent this month. This is an optimization which is ongoing from our end. Other that, we have been fairly happy with Splunk and what we get out of it.

Splunk's website is quite useful. You can find a lot of information on it. I would recommend to use it and try to figure out the product's features and what you can actually do with Splunk. You can do a lot of things with Splunk, but you need to know what to do first. I have used both the AWS and on-premise versions, but in two different environment, so I am unable to compare the versions.

It works well when searching logs. If you looked to try to do things beyond this, the problem that we ran into is that we treated it as the hammer which hits all nails. That is not really feasible, and there are other tools out there that can do more specialized things. User administration is key. Trying to prevent users from being able search records all the time is a huge problem. You need a tight approval process on dashboards, making sure the dashboards are queried in the most efficient way possible. The on-premise version that we had was not scalable at all. It was very difficult to use. We have EC2 instances in the cloud with Splunk installed, which is more scalable and easier to use. It now works much better.

We're a Splunk customer. To those considering just going with the cheapest solution, it depends on your level of comfort with support. If you have a cheaper tool, the support would be addressed. With Splunk, that's the difference - their support response. If you have a tool with a good license, you will be able to get immediate help if there's any vulnerability. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd advise others to take time to learn the solution and develop skills. It's all about DSL queries. If you are off on queries, it won't give you any results. You need to be accurate with your SQL commands.

We are Splunk customers. We do not use it in multiple environments. We just use it on-premises. I'm not yet using the threat intelligence features. We do not use the mission control feature. I have not created any customized dashboards as of now. At some point, I will create one for, for example, Windows Security. I'm still in the process of mastering threat detection and XDR. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I haven't used it for such a long time, so it's hard to give comprehensive details about the solution.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of 10.

Currently, we are just Splunk customers. We do not monitor various clouds; we only monitor one. However, they have a good solution in that we don't need to worry about maintenance if we do. We've never used the Mission Control feature. If someone is looking for the cheapest SIEM solution, there are a lot of open-source options out there. However, Splunk definitely is an option. If a company is bigger, it would benefit from Splunk. They will be paying some money for it, however, it's worth it. Resilience is important. To some extent, Splunk addresses this as we haven't had any issues. It's important to have resiliency. If your solution is not resilient, you risk security issues. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I would advise others to spell out what you really need and make it measurable so that you will understand if Splunk is right for you. If you are going to use Splunk, it's important to do your due diligence.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security seven out of ten. The threat detection capabilities that we get by default are very basic. However, if we want to implement the most effective threat protection on the internet, we need to purchase a relevant solution for intelligent threat protection. This will provide us with more feeds for enterprise security and help us to integrate data by matching the data to the target and to the security with our Splunk. We have 60 percent of our customers using Splunk Enterprise Security in their environments. Splunk maintenance is required for updates. Splunk provides a centralized monitoring platform, eliminating the need to switch between different platforms to monitor security. Splunk provides a clear view of different security losses and incidents, and we can onboard any number of devices as needed. We can monitor our entire environment from one place, requiring only one team to monitor it. Splunk adds a lot of value currently.

If budget is not an issue, you can go ahead with Splunk Enterprise Security. Nowadays, Splunk is ready to negotiate. With good negotiation, you might get a good deal. If you are a large organization with more than 2,000 devices or more than 500 licenses, Splunk is the best choice. If price is not an issue, you can blindly go with Splunk because it is the most mature tool in the market at this time. Microsoft Sentinel is scaling up, but it is still not there where Splunk Enterprise Security is. Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of ten. Organizations that value their security should not choose the cheapest SIEM solution. They should expect to invest in a SIEM solution that can meet their specific needs, even if it means spending more money. Monthly patching maintenance is required.

The resilience of the solution is good. It's quite scalable, however, it does depend on the license. If you want more sources or logs you need to increase your license. I'd advise users to evaluate the solution to see if it meets their personal requirements. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.

I'm a customer. We cannot use the cloud versions as we are based in Iran. I don’t have experience with the Spunk Mission Control feature. I've worked with Splunk so far and while it's very easy to use it's not free. There are other solutions that are open-source that you could use, however, I find Splunk to be worth the price and I'd recommend it to others. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. I would recommend Splunk to others.

I'm a customer and end-user. I'd recommend the solution to others and invite them to test the service first on the infrastructure they have. It's a very valuable product to have. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten. We do not monitor the cloud environments with Splunk. While we have several cloud environments, we avoid using Splunk for this purpose due to its high cost. To utilize Splunk, it would be necessary to place the Splunk engine in the cloud and gather all the logs from various cloud sources, resulting in substantial expenses due to the large volume of logs. As a result, our primary usage of Splunk is on-premise. Instead, we employ different systems to monitor the cloud, generating alerts through various security mechanisms. These alerts are then processed in Splunk, reducing both data traffic and costs. Splunk Enterprise Security's capabilities to analyze malicious activities and detect breaches are similar to those of other systems. Its effectiveness depends on the rules we develop within it. To truly maximize its value and tailor it to the organization's needs, a significant amount of additional work and utilization of professional services are required. The reduction of the alert volume presents a challenge due to the X number of personnel in the security alert center. They can effectively handle only Y alerts per day without experiencing fatigue. When the volume surpasses this limit, they tend to merely open and close alerts without thorough investigation. It's as if they've become weary of the process. Therefore, we must determine the optimal number of alerts per day and adjust the rules accordingly. The primary objective is to achieve a statistically reasonable number of alerts per day. This number should be somewhat higher than the current rate, but not three times greater, as exceeding this threshold would render their efforts ineffective. Conversely, if the number of alerts is too high, the personnel's capacity to take action is undermined, resulting in a lack of meaningful outcomes. Striking a balanced middle ground is imperative. This approach enables us to effectively identify and address crucial matters while ensuring our personnel can thoroughly investigate each alert. Depending on the goals an organization aims to achieve, if their sole focus is on finding the most economical solution and they do not prioritize comprehensiveness, then QRadar would suffice. However, if they seek instant access to answers, I would recommend Splunk Enterprise Security. Splunk Enterprise Security is deployed across our entire network. Maintenance is necessary for the system, and updates are needed periodically. Whenever we acquire a new system, we must connect it to Splunk. Resilience constitutes a crucial component of Splunk Enterprise Security, contributing significantly to the safeguarding of our system. I recommend Splunk Enterprise Security for organizations that have the budget, time, and skill to properly utilize the solution. I do recommend paying for Splunk Professional Services.

We are behind a few versions. So I hope that as we upgrade, I get more ideas for what I'd like to improve. We're still in the process of moving to the cloud. The product has improved our organization's business resilience. The right tools are available to our analysts within the product, and we use them daily. It has drastically driven down our time to remediate, which is huge for us. It's huge for any company. We don't want four hours to find out that something has gone terribly, terribly wrong. Finding such issues before they turn into full-blown security incidents has been our biggest impact. Splunk Enterprise Security empowers our staff. It is so user-friendly. It allows our analysts at every level to learn the tool and learn more about security through the tool. I progressed from level one. Now, I'm a content developer for enterprise security. The usability of Splunk is the best on the market. The solution has helped reduce our mean time to resolve. As we add new features and applications into Splunk, time to value is pretty quick on most things. As long as we have someone that's willing to go through the effort to configure, the time to value is rapid. Adding applications to Splunk is a seamless experience. The UI of Splunk makes life so much easier. Some of my experience is based on technical debt in the organizations I worked with. I would probably rate the tool a ten if we didn't have so much technical debt. By attending Splunk conferences, I get to learn about all the new tools and how to implement them. I use it for RBA and Machine Learning Toolkit. I develop content for our company. I am here to learn how to implement RBA and Machine Learning Toolkit better to reduce alert fatigue for my analysts. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

I would rate Enterprise Security a nine out of ten. Not a ten because everything has room for improvement. The biggest value of the Splunk conference is meeting people.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a seven out of ten. There is definitely some room for improvement. I have not installed the newer version. Once I get into it, I will see what new capabilities there are, but there is a decent lift that is needed for the setup. Professional services help with that, but the customer generally does not like paying for that more than once. Because of the ELA, I am able to come to Splunk conferences for free instead of having to pay my own dime. That helps tremendously, especially considering the fact that education is included. I believe that is because of the enterprise license agreement with the government contract. That helps out a lot. I have been coming to conferences since 2017. There are a lot of good people and a great community.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a ten out of ten. I have worked with other SIEM solutions before and Splunk is the best one. The biggest value I get out of attending a Splunk conference is getting to network with other people within my same account under my same account manager. I appreciate the ability to go to sessions about different support products that my organization doesn't use and try to help myself understand how some of these tools are used and how I could encourage my organization to use them.

I do see the possibility and the opportunity to increase the meantime to resolution by a lot. We use several different applications to monitor logs. We have the vision. I've seen some of the updates and changes like Splunk AI and Splunk Vision Control that look nice. I didn't manage to get on some of the hands-on, which would have been lovely. I would like to get more ideas on how we can integrate Splunk into our networks. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten. I see the opportunity and I'm hoping with our engineer that we can get to where we can make the best use of Splunk. It really seems great. A lot of our staff here were all ready to use it. We're just hoping our engineer can get to the place where we can actually make use of it. The biggest value I get from attending a Splunk conference is being able to see the updates, changes, the features they're adding, the Splunk AI, and Splunk Vision Control. That's been nice. I am looking forward to some of the sessions. I want to get more ideas on how we can integrate Splunk into our networks and things like that, especially focusing on cybersecurity. I would also like to see some of the stock sessions because it's a brand new stock. We're trying to stand it up. Seeing how they're using it for stocks would be great.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten due to its high total cost of ownership, difficulties in maintenance, and the complexity of configuration immediately after deployment. Splunk Enterprise Security may not be cost-effective for small and even some medium-sized companies. While each organization has different requirements, we do recommend Splunk for medium and large organizations. Organizations should take into account the complexity of their environment. For instance, if they have a purely vendor-based environment for their network security appliance, it may be easier for them to handle security, fabric, and architecture requirements. However, if they operate in a multi-vendor and mixed environment, they need to conduct more research on how to integrate various components. Often, they rush into negotiating their cybersecurity program without sufficient research, leading to potential problems for clients.

In terms of maintenance of Splunk, you need to have an IT administrator monitoring it at all times. When it comes to a large, enterprise customer's critical infrastructure, Splunk is one of the best solutions to use in a security operations center. It has multiple advantages, such as the dashboard that provides complete visibility, and a threat detection system with very advanced features. It is very valuable for any company that wants a good protection system. You should definitely consider Splunk as one of your options for your SOC.

We work on multiple cloud environments including AWS, Azure, GCP, and most of the popular clouds. We have built our own combined app to monitor most of the cloud service providers. We have our own solution for cloud security monitoring. My advice is that for big firms, because it has better detection and security, Splunk Enterprise Security is a very good tool. For big companies, good security is important, especially if they have a global market. I don't see any other software having as much functionality and different ways to investigate security.

I give Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. Using a SIEM is not cheap, no matter how you slice it. So, the first question I would ask is, what are we trying to do with our SIEM? In my opinion, Splunk, including ES shines when we are willing to invest in learning and modifying our SIEM, our solution, and our environment to align it with what we do and how we do it. If we are willing to make that investment to contextualize the security and visibility, then Splunk is a tool that can help us do that. If we are looking for a turnkey solution, where we can just throw logs at something and then pull the arm of the slot machine and get things out, then Splunk is not necessarily the right tool for us. We can get there, but it will be a pricey slot machine. I think we will get the most value out of Splunk if we want to get things that are more contextual to us. We may need to enhance or build off of the Splunk dashboards that ES includes, and that will help us to create dashboards that are extremely relevant to our environment. If we are comfortable with creating Splunk queries, then we will have a lot of power at our fingertips. To those looking into the solution, I would ask: What are they looking for? What are they willing to invest in? Do they want to understand queries? Do they want to build the knowledge around how to structure them? Are they willing to put in the effort to get the real power out of it, or are they expecting something to tell them what is going on? They need to realize that it is never going to be built for them at that point. So they are going to be getting something generic. They have to consider their specific situation, such as how many people they have on their team, etc. They should also probably take a good stock of what they are trying to log and how long they have to retain it. I have been very happy with our Splunk Cloud instances. They have been very reliable. I think it has been incredibly powerful for us. I think that is also another aspect of whether they are going to have their SIEM in their environment or outside of their environment. They need to think about some of these items. Obviously, Splunk can go either way. They have to make their decisions there. We have been very happy with our Splunk Cloud instance. So that's what's been really good for us. And, also, it takes some of the administrative aspects and puts them on somebody else. That's valuable for us too.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. I would give it a ten if it had built-in threat management.

I would rate Splunk Cloud a 6.5 out of 10, but plugged on time, I would give it 8.8 out of 10. The maintenance of Splunk is a bit difficult due to the time-consuming tech support. I would recommend Splunk. I cannot compare Splunk with any other SIEM solution because I have worked with many different solutions and logarithms, like the ManageEngine Endpoint Central, and Wazuh. I have used Splunk for two years and I can see Splunk as really the best SIEM solution that can be used for work. I totally recommend it even though I gave some negative feedback, it's because I am coming from a product perspective. We have to also take into consideration the security perspective. I am not talking about only visibility in which they should take a lot of care, but the way the solution is handling and even manipulating the data. This is the most valuable thing.

Splunk is an excellent tool for monitoring, troubleshooting, and analyzing your IT infrastructure. It has saved me a lot of time figuring out my system's issues. Splunk plays an important role in on-track and off-track performance. Splunk provides unified security and unlimited tailor-made applications.

Familiarize yourself with the basics of Splunk. There is a lot of functionality in Splunk, and it can be overwhelming at first. Start by learning to index and search data, then move on to more advanced topics.

Set up alerts for important events. One of the best features of Splunk is its ability to send alerts when particular events occur. This can help you quickly identify issues and correct them before they become bigger problems.

Use their Active Dashboards. They offer end-to-end visibility to get insight and have a single view of their data. Hence, I suggest using Splunk for complex environments and huge data ingestions. The only challenge in using Splunk is its pricing. Because they have a daily limit on parsing the logs, if they offered lower pricing, you could even buy more capabilities to parse logs daily.

If it is a complex environment and data ingestion is huge where you want to ingest Syslogs or networking devices logs, you should go with Splunk. It is better than QRadar. Nowadays, the usage of AWS is growing, and that should be taken into consideration when deciding about on-premises or cloud deployment. I would rate it a nine out of 10. I find it great. I'm very eager to do the Splunk certifications as well.

I can recommend this solution to others. It is a great product. I would rate it an eight out of 10.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using this solution. I would say the forums and READMEs provide more than enough information about Splunk. Most people struggle because they move too quickly through the implementation process. As long as you follow the guidelines, particularly the specifications for environment requirements and implementation methodology, these solutions should work out of the box. Splunk is a very good solution, I would rate it a ten out of ten.

My understanding is that as a company, we are migrating to Azure. When this happens, Splunk will be decommissioned. Overall, I don't think that this is a very good product and I don't recommend it. I would rate this solution a five out of ten.

I would rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

I have been using Splunk for approximately

Splunk is a very good platform for analytics and cybersecurity. We use it very extensively. It is very easy to use, and it is very stable and scalable. I would rate it a nine out of 10.

We are a customer and an end-user. I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very happy with its capabilities in general. The only downside is the pricing. If the price would be lower, you would have the possibility to buy more capacity for parsing logs per day. In Splunk, you have a daily limit of logs that will be parsed. If you place that limit several times, the Splunk license will be blocked and you have to talk with support to get a recovery license. With the capacity, you can include, let's say, 30 servers, but if you want to include another 20 servers, you have to buy an additional license, which is very costly. That said, for medium and large enterprise businesses it's really necessary to have. Even in smaller businesses, it is good to have. It's just the price that would stop small businesses from taking it on. If a small business has less than 500 MB logs/day, they may use a splunk free license.

This solution has good technology. I rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

If this solution matches the needs of your use case then I would give it a try. I rate Splunk a nine out of ten.

There is a large number of options for training and certification. The more training you have the more useful Splunk becomes. However, right out the gate you can do useful searches due to the search bar design.

If you are considering Splunk and you like what you are seeing; my advice would be to go for it. I would rate Splunk an 8 out of 10.

I rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

I'm a consultant. I'm also a customer and use it myself. We use multiple deployment models, including public and private clouds. We typically use the latest version of the solution. I'd advise potential new users to get a proper plan. They should have a good partner or someone that can help them and quickly map and orchestrate. I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.

I would advise making sure that your staff is very aware of how the program works. After one or two classes, I got the hang of it, and it felt like I knew everything that was there to know about it, but when we went into the next class, I realized that there is a lot more. So, if you are going to use the program, I would advise making sure that everyone is trained and everyone really understands it. You should take your time to go into the nitty-gritty. You can very easily think that you know everything, but when you make mistakes in Splunk, at least from my experience, it can get messy quickly. So, you want to make sure that everyone has a very good understanding of what they're doing so that you can keep everything organized and accurate. I would rate it an eight out of 10. When we're getting into the nuts and bolts and looking at the data, it is an eight, but when we are just navigating through the website, it is a seven. Only its UI needs improvement. It isn't bad, but there is room for improvement. They should make it a little bit more user-friendly.

Due to the cost of Splunk, I recommend it for larger companies. Splunk is powerful when sorting huge amounts of data. Implementation of Splunk takes preparation. It requires a lot of resources and needs the infrastructure to support the project. I would rate the solution an 8 out of 10.

My advice to anyone considering Splunk is to understand exactly how much data you want to look at and you want to bring in on a daily basis. Then create a rational strategy to bring the data in, in reasonably sized chunks, that fulfill a use case at a time. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk a really good nine. I'd rate it a really good nine because it's really versatile. You can do a lot of things with it. It allows you to do a lot of analytics in the platform without needing a bunch of other third partyware to help you figure it out.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. Splunk has a user-friendly interface and GUI. Its architecture is also much more sophisticated than others.

It is hard to integrate because it can do so many things. A lot of people think it is a set-it-and-forget-it solution, but it is a full-time job for somebody. I would advise others to plan and prepare for ongoing management. It requires a dedicated person for management. Compared to other SIEMs, it is a 10 out of 10.

I would advise making sure that you incorporate enough storage and processing in order to properly support the environment. I would rate it an eight out of 10. It is definitely the best tool I've ever used, but nothing is perfect. They could do a little bit better on data compression and system resource management, but outside of that, it is an excellent product.

The solution can be deployed both on-premises and on the cloud. I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very happy with the product. I would recommend the solution. It really is the best.

I work in security architectures, not operations, so I don't actually work with Splunk on a regular basis, but the team that does is working on threat hunting and incident management. I rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

I would rate Splunk a nine out of ten. I recommend this product to others who are considering implementing it.

Those who are interested in implementing this solution should be prepared to dig deep into their pockets. I would rate Splunk a nine out of ten.

We do not sell Compliance Control Limited solutions because our focus is on auditing and independent security assessments. We put an end to our selling program with Checkmarks. I would recommend this solution to others. Splunk is appropriate for small to medium-sized projects, and it should be calculated for large projects. It's one of the best CM solutions on the market for monitoring, and correlation, as well as IT monitoring security. I would rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

We use Splunk and we also sell and support it for our clients. Normally our policy is to keep software updated to the latest version. The main issue is that we do enterprise architecture and network and security operations. We recommend certain platforms to clients. We don't always sell Splunk directly to them due to the fact that, since we're being hired to help them make choices, we need to be neutral. In the cases where it doesn't make sense, we don't sell it. We just help clients make decisions. I don't know which version of the solution we're using. I'm an architect; I'm not on the operations level. I'm not the one who actually uses it. Our operations use it. I get dashboard results and I do reports that are based on it, however, I'm not the one actually running it. We have a NOC and a SOC and others use it a lot more individually. They have a lot more interaction than I do. I'm getting reports out of it. Others are actually connecting to it, using it as a tool. I'm not a tool user. I'm an information user. All Splunk is, is data collection and it can sort things out on a dashboard. However, a lot of what Splunk does is collect data and you have to decide what kind of information you're going to let it collect. When we're doing design operations we have to really pay attention to what we're doing, so we don't actually slow things down or impede things. The reason we use Splunk is we put a lot of data into it. With Splunk, you need to really be careful about what you're monitoring and how you use it, to get keep the results working. It's a good tool if you know what you're doing and what you need to be logging. You need to be aware of what you're logging to ensure it isn't going to cause problems with your performance. I wouldn't recommend it for somebody who's coming in new. Of the clients we have using it, I don't know if any of them don't have professional IT running it. It's important to really understand what's going on. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. In certain environments, it could be a bit complex. It's not something you could just drop into an organization, you need to be trained to use it. You need the experience to use it properly.

We are partners of Splunk and provide the solution to customers. I feel Splunk is easy to utilize. My company has an app. on which the solution is deployed on-premises on a single server. There is another team in my company that works with Splunk products. I rate Splunk as a seven-point-five out of ten.

I cannot think of anything disadvantageous about Splunk, as we are talking about a product that I like. I feel the solution has beautiful features. The decision to go with Splunk would depend on the business needs of the individual. I know that Splunk has both a cloud and an on-premises option. Sometimes, such as when it comes to conferences, there is no need to move some of the data to the cloud for the purpose of complying with regional requirements. There may be a need to retain some of it and a person might wish for a mixture of on-cloud and on-premises capabilities. I rate Splunk as an eight out of ten. It is a robust platform and easy to use.

I would advise definitely taking advantage of their professional services and making sure that the administrators and whoever is going to be using the tool go through the training. The cost for the training, which depends on if you're commercial or government, is not that much, and there is a definite value there because if you're trying to learn it on your own with a book, it is going to take forever. I would rate Splunk a seven out of 10.

The solution is cloud-based. There are more than a thousand users making use of the solution in our organization, who are connected with us in over 530 different areas. I recommend the solution and plan to continue using it. I rate Splunk as a seven out of ten.

I rate Splunk a seven out of ten.

We are customers and end-users. I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We're partners and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with Splunk. We use the latest version. I'm not hands-on. I'm called the architect, however, we do use the latest version as that's a part of our configuration management framework, that all of our applications - especially in security - are up-to-date with the latest and greatest updates, bells, and whistles. We use both public and private clouds. In terms of creating the solution, for what we do from an enterprise standpoint, everything from monitoring to data capture to reporting, we would rate it at a nine out of ten.

We're a partner and a customer. I'm using the latest version of the solution. I would highly recommend the solution. It's the best product out there. It's definitely easy to set up. The use cases are multiple. It's not restrictive in terms of the efficiency of the platform. Just make sure that you have enough resources or good counsel from people who can help with the use cases. If you do the sky would be the limit. It is a good solution. I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.

Splunk is easy to use and not having the need to log into every single network device for management is helpful. I rate Splunk a seven out of ten.

I rate Splunk a five out of ten.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.