Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Zenoss Cloud Logo

Zenoss Cloud Reviews

Vendor: Zenoss
4.2 out of 5

What is Zenoss Cloud?

Featured Zenoss Cloud reviews

Zenoss Cloud mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Zenoss Cloud in the Application Infrastructure category stands at 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Zenoss Cloud1.4%
Apache Web Server10.5%
IIS9.9%
Other78.2%
Application Infrastructure

PeerResearch reports based on Zenoss Cloud reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication InfrastructureMar 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonZenoss Cloud vs IISMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonZenoss Cloud vs Microsoft .NET FrameworkMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonZenoss Cloud vs IBM WebSphere Application ServerMar 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Datadog4.3N/A97%209 interviewsAdd to research
Zabbix4.2N/A95%108 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise28
Large Enterprise74
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Performing Arts
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
8%
Transportation Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Retailer
5%
Healthcare Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Media Company
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Government
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
 
Zenoss Cloud Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra3.5I find Zenoss Service Dynamics stable and effective for real-time device monitoring, helping retain customers. However, I wish its pricing model for server items was simpler, and it needs better public cloud, especially Azure, integration.
Responsable Commercial at Zen Networks4.5I find this solution easy to use, stable, and highly scalable, significantly preventing crashes for large user bases. While its comprehensive monitoring and support are excellent, I believe its AI capabilities need improvement.
Security Architect at ITSur5.0I find Zenoss excellent for monitoring networks and user experience, praising its dashboard, Twill, scalability, and fast support. Setup is easy, though I wish it offered sound alerts and better auditing. Overall, I highly recommend this solution.
Principal Infra Developer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5I find Zenoss a cost-effective solution for unified, agentless monitoring, accommodating new technologies and offering excellent support. While administration has become complex since Zenoss 5, I believe it needs more focus on application and mobile performance monitoring.
CEO/Founder at Zen Networks4.5As a system integrator, I find this flexible solution, especially its discovery mechanism, very stable despite its learning curve. It's better than Nagios, but I wish for a graphical network view and more open-source focus.
Consulting Cloud Architect at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I find Zenoss good, especially its custom integration, stability, and scalability. However, its setup and general use are complex, and it has issues with storage monitoring.
Sr. Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I find Zenoss's Docker container concept groundbreaking, being the first monitoring tool with such features. While now stable, I believe threshold parameters should be percentage-based, not raw values. Setup is straightforward, and customer support is good; I've used it for two years.
CTO, Partner at a tech company with 51-200 employees4.0I appreciate this solution's scalability and deep customization, but I find deployment and setup overly complicated. Technical support is poor with incomplete documentation, and ZSD is expensive for lower volumes.