Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
RPA Developer at a non-tech company with self employed
Real User
Top 20
Reduces development time and improves productivity and accuracy
Pros and Cons
  • "The machine learning (ML) extractor is valuable. It helps in extracting information from even unstructured documents. It can sometimes also extract information from a written document. Without much manual intervention, it is able to process the documents. This is a unique feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
  • "There could be a feature similar to ChatGPT where when you ask about a document, you get an answer about what is there in that document. If possible, this kind of feature can be incorporated so that you do not need to open a file and take the value. It should directly detect that instead of opening and validating the document. Such a feature will speed up the process."

What is our primary use case?

I have been using it for processing invoices, receipts, and multiple forms of documents. We have structured and unstructured documents. Structured documents include forms, and unstructured documents include written documents and receipts. For identifying the type of document and for processing those documents, we use UiPath Document Understanding. It helps to identify the type, extract the information, and process the information.

How has it helped my organization?

We are able to process multiple documents and extract information from them. We can put that information into an Excel or a PowerPoint file. We can also put that on a website or in an application such as SAP. We can generate a PDF. We can do all this with UiPath Document Understanding. So far, I have only exported information into an Excel file. I have not integrated it with any other system.

UiPath Document Understanding can extract information from unstructured or handwritten documents. It can extract information from structured documents such as forms. It can process invoices. I have mostly tried it with structured documents, and I have not had any problems with it.

UiPath Document Understanding makes the work easy. It can classify a document and capture the information. It is able to process a document quicker than a human. Its AI and ML capabilities improve productivity and accuracy. If we have a lot of invoices of a certain pattern, we can feed that pattern. It can then process multiple documents of that pattern. This way machine learning helps us to easily process more documents.

We can now design or develop a process much faster. Previously, we had to do string manipulation to extract information from invoices, which required a lot of coding knowledge, but with UiPath Document Understanding, that is not required. It automatically identifies the type of document and extracts information. It saves time and improves accuracy. It is a low-code or no-code solution, and even someone who is not skilled in programming can design a process. From half an hour to one hour, process designing now takes 10 to 15 minutes. 

Human validation is required for certain business processes. The Present Validation Station activity enables you to review and confirm whether correct values are extracted or not.

UiPath Document Understanding reduces human errors. Humans can make mistakes while extracting information or while coding. To avoid all those problems, we are using UiPath Document Understanding. It helps us reduce human errors because no coding is involved. We are directly teaching the system how to identify a document. It automatically identifies a document and extracts information from it. Because the system does that by itself, we can reduce a lot of human error. There is a 40% to 50% reduction.

What is most valuable?

The machine learning (ML) extractor is valuable. It helps in extracting information from even unstructured documents. It can sometimes also extract information from a written document. Without much manual intervention, it is able to process the documents. This is a unique feature of UiPath Document Understanding.

What needs improvement?

There could be a feature similar to ChatGPT where when you ask about a document, you get an answer about what is there in that document. If possible, this kind of feature can be incorporated so that you do not need to open a file and take the value. It should directly detect that instead of opening and validating the document. Such a feature will speed up the process.

Buyer's Guide
UiPath Document Understanding
July 2025
Learn what your peers think about UiPath Document Understanding. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for the past two or three months. I have been using it only for practicing. I am not using it for any industrial purpose.

How are customer service and support?

UiPath is giving very good support. They also have some webinars, which are very helpful in developing our solution. I would rate their support a nine out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before UiPath Document Understanding, I was using string manipulation and screen scraping methods for extracting values from invoices. It used to take more time to build a solution. 

How was the initial setup?

It is deployed on-prem. Its deployment was straightforward. It took 10 to 15 minutes.

In terms of maintenance, bots require some maintenance. Bots can fail, so continued maintenance may be required.

What about the implementation team?

I deployed it myself. I am using it on my own.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I have only been using its free version.

What other advice do I have?

It is a very good solution. It improves productivity and accuracy. It reduces development time.

You can use UiPath Document Understanding even when you do not have programming knowledge. You just need to know the pattern of documents. It has ML capabilities, and the bot will automatically learn and start to identify and process documents. It is very easy.

Overall, I would rate UiPath Document Understanding a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Sourav Bhunia - PeerSpot reviewer
RPA Developer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Helps extract images, signatures, and writing
Pros and Cons
  • "UiPath Document Understanding's image file extraction feature is the best in any OCR solution."
  • "The signature comparison feature of UiPath Document Understanding could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

I use UiPath Document Understanding to extract data from scanned images using OCR technology. For example, when we have invoices, we can extract data from them by creating a model for that particular template using OCR technology, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Every invoice has its own template, so we can create a template model and implement it in UiPath to run a bot for the data extraction process. After extracting the data, we can store it in an Excel file or database, whichever we prefer.

We deploy UiPath Document Understanding in the cloud and then integrate it with our on-premises architecture using a single key.

How has it helped my organization?

UiPath can automate any repetitive task, such as data entry, data extraction, file downloading, and file uploading, in any financial services, banking, or health insurance sector. The document formats include tables and checkboxes.

It can extract handwriting and signatures as long as they are legible.

Machine learning capabilities can be used to retrain prebuilt models for use with other templates.

It has helped improve our organization by reducing human tasks and errors.

Whenever data is extracted from a document using UiPath Document Understanding, we receive a confidence level rating. If the confidence level is low, we send the extracted information to the Action Center for human validation.

UiPath Document Understanding does the work of three full-time employees.

Using UiPath Document Understanding for documents without business or application exceptions reduces human error by 100 percent.

What is most valuable?

UiPath Document Understanding's image file extraction feature is the best in any OCR solution.

What needs improvement?

The signature comparison feature of UiPath Document Understanding could be improved.

To my understanding, we can only integrate UiPath Document Understanding with UiPath. I would like the ability to integrate with other solutions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using UiPath Document Understanding for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding is stable. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used an Excel automation tool but switched to UiPath Document Understanding because it is a better solution for repetitive tasks.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment was completed by two people including myself.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation was completed in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We received a 60-day free trial before having to purchase a license to continue using UiPath Document Understanding.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate UiPath Document Understanding nine out of ten.

Data extraction accuracy depends on the document's quality and format. The maximum percentage of accurate data we can extract using UiPath Document Understanding is 90 percent.

We started to see the value right after implementing UiPath Document Understanding.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Document Understanding
July 2025
Learn what your peers think about UiPath Document Understanding. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Business Head for Syber Security at One Networks
Real User
Top 10
Helps free up time, reduce human error, and automate processes
Pros and Cons
  • "The prebuilt algorithm for extracting foreign invoices is the most valuable feature because it eliminates the need for us to build anything from scratch."
  • "The signature and handwriting are a pain point for the OCR and have room for improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We are a system integrator in the manufacturing industry and our clients use UiPath Document Understanding for their invoicing cycle processing.

Previously, our clients manually entered invoices into their systems, seeking a solution to automate this process while still maintaining controls for verification and audit purposes. We implemented UiPath Document Understanding to address this need.

How has it helped my organization?

Data entry is the most common use for UiPath Document Understanding.

In Italy, a common document format for simplified sales invoices is the BBT, which lists the total cost of the entire merchandise unit.

Since our clients are primarily small and medium-sized businesses, UiPath Document Understanding processes around 10,000 documents annually.

The documents contain a header and a large table where data is extracted.

Around 30 percent of the documents are fully completed by UiPath Document Understanding.

AI and machine learning do a great job sorting and identifying fields and documentation orientation. Managing different layouts is the most valuable attribute of AI.

Companies that use the UiPath platform can easily integrate UiPath Document Understanding using a few modules.

Human validation is required for 20 to 30 percent of cases and it takes less than one minute to complete.

UiPath Document Understanding helps reduce human error by 70 percent.

UiPath Document Understanding has helped free up around 70 percent of people's time to work on other projects.

For most of our clients, the time to value is usually six months.

What is most valuable?

The prebuilt algorithm for extracting foreign invoices is the most valuable feature because it eliminates the need for us to build anything from scratch.

What needs improvement?

The signature and handwriting are a pain point for the OCR and have room for improvement.

The extraction logic portion of the UI is not as user-friendly as the rest of the platform and has room for improvement.

I would like to have generative AI integration added to a future release.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using UiPath Document Understanding for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of UiPath Document Understanding is good. The higher the stability the less maintenance is required.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability can be improved with the help of generative AI. It is difficult to build an algorithm and move to another project without making important changes to it.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial deployment process is not user-friendly. It requires a lot of steps, although depending on the size of the deployment, one person can usually manage it.

The average deployment takes around one month to complete. 

What about the implementation team?

We implement the solution for our clients.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price for UiPath Document Understanding is a bit expensive.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate UiPath Document Understanding a nine out of ten.

The number of people required for maintenance depends on the project. It can go from one person up to seven.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer2293893 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mrs at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Gives us a complete, unattended process for extracting details from PDFs, saving us hundreds of hours
Pros and Cons
  • "In UiPath Document Understanding, I use two extractors. One is the Intelligent Form Extractor and the other is the Machine Learning Extractor. The first one is very useful and user-friendly. When we have a single template or two to three templates, Intelligent Form Extractor is much easier to use. But if we have multiple templates, it's better to go with ML Extractor as you can train the model with different templates."
  • "There are also problems with handwritten documents. The results from those are not 90 percent accurate. With scanned and native PDFs, it is 90 to 99 percent accurate, but the accuracy of handwritten documents is somewhat less. If they could improve on that, it would also be helpful."

What is our primary use case?

Our use cases are in the banking sector. We have certain PDFs that contain customer data, and we have to extract data from them and compare it with the data provided earlier. The PDFs can be scanned, handwritten, or native PDFs.

How has it helped my organization?

It gives us a complete, unattended process for extracting details from PDFs. Otherwise, that would been redundant work done by specialists. It is saving us around 800 workers.

For one record, we used to take about half an hour, but Document Understanding completes things in seconds. It's very quick. It has also reduced human error a lot.

What is most valuable?

In UiPath Document Understanding, I use two extractors. One is the Intelligent Form Extractor and the other is the Machine Learning Extractor. The first one is very useful and user-friendly. When we have a single template or two to three templates, Intelligent Form Extractor is much easier to use. But if we have multiple templates, it's better to go with ML Extractor as you can train the model with different templates.

The artificial intelligence features are very good. The more you train it, the more you will benefit from it.

Also, integrating Document Understanding with other systems or applications is not complex. It's quite easy. Even for attended processes, if you combine UiPath Document Understanding with Action Center, it's almost like unattended processing.

What needs improvement?

Document Understanding is a combination of the extractor and OCR. Depending on the taxonomy that you give and the classification that you define, it is accurate. But there are multiple OCRs and I find UiPath Document Understanding to be as accurate as Microsoft or Textract OCR. If the accuracy was improved, it would be much better.

There are also problems with handwritten documents. The results from those are not 90 percent accurate. With scanned and native PDFs, it is 90 to 99 percent accurate, but the accuracy of handwritten documents is somewhat less. If they could improve on that, it would also be helpful.

Also, in the banking sector, we can't use the cloud-based Orchestrator or cloud endpoints for OCR. Getting approval for ML Extractor takes a lot of time for us. Instead, if we could go with Intelligent Form Extractor, it would save a lot of approval time. If they could improve and add features to Intelligent Form Extractor, it would make our lives easier.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with UiPath for five and a half years and with Document Understanding for one and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not experienced it crashing or lagging.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good. I haven't seen any waste of money.

How are customer service and support?

We have not contacted their technical support very much.

How was the initial setup?

We do not use UiPath in the cloud; we have our own internal version, so the initial setup took time for us. But that had nothing to do with UiPath. It was because of our company's policies.

It took time for people to understand it, but once they got it, it went well.

What was our ROI?

It took some time because Document Understanding is pricey compared to other tools in UiPath. After 10 to 15 days, when there were fewer errors, that's when we started to see profits.

What other advice do I have?

I would suggest combining other technologies with UiPath. That's when you see more benefit from Document Understanding.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2274936 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Consultant-Software Development RPA Technology at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Consultant
Helps simplify our process and reduces human validation and errors
Pros and Cons
  • "There are many features that can be added to the action center to keep humans in the loop to evaluate the accuracy of the extracted data."
  • "UiPath Document Understanding could be more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

We use UiPath Document Understanding to extract data from invoices so that the data can be entered into SAP applications. We often receive multiple invoices in different formats. To use UiPath Document Understanding, we need to train the document. This means that we need to provide a sample template that the robot can use to learn how to read the invoices and extract the desired data. The labels in the fields are important, as they tell the robot what information to extract. 

For example, the invoice number, seller's address, quantity, and any other required information. The table of line items also needs to be extracted. We define the fields from which we need to extract data. We use the form-based extractor or machine learning extractor to extract the data. We export the extracted data to an Excel file. This allows us to collect all of the data from multiple invoices in a single location. We can also implement a validation step to ensure that the robot has extracted the data correctly. This can be done easily by using the human in the loop to manually review the extracted data before it is entered into SAP applications.

How has it helped my organization?

Our organization has many invoices of varying formats. To simplify the process, we implemented UiPath Document Understanding to extract the required data from all the unstructured invoices and import it into a single, structured Excel sheet.

Using the different endpoints and machine learning, we can extract data in different formats including handwriting and signatures.

UiPath Document Understanding's machine-learning capabilities are good. We use it to extract the information we need from documents of any format, and then align it with the corresponding table.

We easily integrated UiPath Document Understanding with UiPath Studio by connecting the data flow from the different applications to extract the necessary records.

We have so many invoices that UiPath Document Understanding helps us classify them. The document is first classified into a type of document, such as an invoice or a resume. This segregation of data allows us to send the invoice templates to our folder and extract the data and all the details without having to read them one by one.

With UiPath Document Understanding, less and less human validation is required over time. Each time we run the process, we can select from an option for attended or unattended automation. The other option is to use the confidence score to determine whether human validation is required.

The handling time before automation for one PDF document was five minutes and now with automation, it is one to two minutes.

UiPath Document Understanding helps to reduce human error by removing the fatigue factor and by continuing to run after hours without breaks.

What is most valuable?

There are many features that can be added to the action center to keep humans in the loop to evaluate the accuracy of the extracted data. We can also set a confidence score threshold, such that if the confidence score is greater than 80 percent, we can take a certain action. Otherwise, we need to manually correct the problem in the action center.

What needs improvement?

UiPath Document Understanding could be more user-friendly. There are so many endpoints, and entering the API is also a manual task. Currently, it is a long and complicated process with many steps. If we remove all of those steps and use the ChatGPT or OpenAI library, we can start using the solution with fewer steps.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using UiPath Document Understanding for six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding can be scaled for multiple invoices.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment was straightforward and required a few days.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate UiPath Document Understanding eight out of ten.

We are processing around 12 documents using UiPath Document Understanding. The documents are in PDF format.

We have four members using the solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2284461 - PeerSpot reviewer
RPA Developer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Helps reduce human error, can handle multiple document formats, and can be trained
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the ability for humans to train the bot."
  • "The extraction and classification process should be simplified."

What is our primary use case?

UiPath Document Understanding allows us to extract information from documents, classify the document type, and optionally validate the data with a human. We also train the bot to learn from the mistakes it makes.

We extract data from boxes and tables, as well as handwritten words.

How has it helped my organization?

UiPath Document Understanding helps us extract from certificates, the names, addresses, states, dates, taxpayer identification numbers, and signatures. We also extract information from health insurance documents such as the name, patient's address, code, and contact information. Additionally, we have invoices that we have to extract from a table with rows.

UiPath Document Understandings' ability to handle different document formats depends on which extraction tool we use and the clarity of the documentation.

I am very satisfied with UiPath Document Understanding AI and machine learning.

UiPath Document Understanding integrates well with other tools. Some of my colleagues have integrated the solution with ABBYY.

It has helped reduce human error.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the ability for humans to train the bot. It can learn from human experience, so if we include steps in our framework for humans to validate extraction or classification, the bot can learn from them to improve document understanding and precision in future document processing.

What needs improvement?

The extraction and classification process should be simplified.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using UiPath Document Understanding for six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial deployment was straightforward. The deployment took three hours to complete.

What about the implementation team?

I implemented the UiPath Document Understanding myself.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate UiPath Document Understanding eight out of ten.

Our organization also uses ABBYY.

We saw the time to value within the first three days of using UiPath Document Understanding.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
RPA Consultant at Aubay Italia S.p.A.
Real User
Provides valuable machine learning, reduces human error, and speeds up processes
Pros and Cons
  • "Machine learning is the most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
  • "I encountered difficulties with UiPath Document Understanding in determining the appropriate OCR to use for certain files."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use cases for UiPath Document Understanding are processing invoices for five different clients and importing/exporting documents to extract vital information, mainly from unstructured documents. These five clients are from various industries, including transportation, scientific research, food services, and clothing.

How has it helped my organization?

I processed 400 documents per day for one client and 20 documents per day for the second client.

The documents processed were in PDF format.

90 percent of the 400 documents processed per day for a single client were fully automated. However, only 50 percent of the 20 documents per day were automated due to their greater level of unstructured nature. As a result, the remaining 50 percent had to be sent to the action center.

AI and machine learning for Document Understanding are game changers. Machine learning was helpful in identifying the various areas of the documents from which I needed to extract different types of information, making the process quicker.

The default model didn't work for me because I needed to extract information from documents written in French. Thus, I had to create my own model using AI, which proved to be exceptionally beneficial for handling the French text and its accents.

Integrating UiPath Document Understanding with other systems and applications in our environment works well. The solution was able to retrieve the PDF document from an email, extract the details using the command, and apply those details to an application, saving a substantial amount of time.

UiPath Document Understanding serves as a safeguard in relation to cost and time savings, as it diminishes the manual workload for employees and minimizes errors. For a job that took a human eight hours to complete, the bot was able to do it in three hours.

The extent of human validation needed for Document Understanding varies for each client. For one client, no validation was necessary as the solution effectively extracted all required information from the documents. However, for another client dealing with diverse document types, errors occasionally occurred due to character placement. This was particularly evident when email addresses were positioned differently, some at the top and others at the bottom of the documents, posing challenges to the robot's detection capabilities. In such instances, a validation process was implemented. Every seven days, ten percent of the batch would be sent to the Action Center for validation.

The time saved with UiPath Document Understanding is exemplified by an organization that previously had to spend three days manually extracting information from 400 documents every month. However, with UiPath Document Understanding, this task now only takes two hours.  

What is most valuable?

Machine learning is the most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding.

What needs improvement?

I encountered difficulties with UiPath Document Understanding in determining the appropriate OCR to use for certain files. These files required extracting both the company logo from the page and the digitized text, posing a challenge. The OCR engine faces difficulties when processing signatures and scanned documents with unclear handwritten text.

The robot faces difficulties in recognizing when there are multiple documents on a single page. This necessitates manual intervention by first splitting the document and then re-digitizing each part separately. 

I would like a split feature in a future release of UiPath Document Understanding.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using UiPath Document Understanding for one month.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding is extremely stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

UiPath Document Understanding is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support responds promptly and strives to resolve our issues quickly. However, there is room for improvement. For instance, we encountered an issue with the Action Center, and the support team was unable to determine the cause for three days. Eventually, someone from my team resolved the issue.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was a bit complex.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I also assessed FlexiCapture, but I discovered that UiPath Document Understanding was more user-friendly. Coming from a scientific background, I found that UiPath Document Understanding offered a more logical and less complex solution.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate UiPath Document Understanding nine out of ten.

It took me one week to study UiPath Document Understanding and to present it to my organization.

I realized the benefits of UiPath Document Understanding once I completed my first project.

The quantity of personnel needed to maintain the solution relies on each project. In the most recent project I participated in, we needed a total of two individuals, one of whom was an administrator from our team.

When using UiPath Document Understanding, always ensure that the number of structures is the same each time to prevent errors.

I believe that utilizing communication mining would be more effective with the AI Center.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Google
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
VivekMishra - PeerSpot reviewer
AVP, Technology & Solutions at Cygnet Infotech
Real User
A solution offering a flexible pricing model that can benefit small businesses
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is quite stable, and I am happy with its performance in my programs and processes."
  • "One area of improvement for UiPath Document Understanding is the accuracy of handwritten documents. While the solution supports handwritten documents, the accuracy percentage is not as high as desired."

What is our primary use case?

We are a service-based company, having a team size of 120 RPA developers.

What is most valuable?

The core technology of UiPath Document Understanding is OCR, which can be either ABBYY or Google Vision. The drag-and-drop facility, decision-making accuracy, and user-friendly actions make UiPath Document Understanding helpful for users.

UiPath Document Understanding offers a feature that allows users to process specific documents, such as purchase orders or invoices. The tool provides the ability to define and segregate actions and highlight fields using something similar to rubber band techniques. This means, in an invoice, users can easily highlight specific fields within the document and train the model accordingly. The process is user-friendly and can be easily executed even by those with basic knowledge of flow.

What needs improvement?

One area of improvement for UiPath Document Understanding is the accuracy of handwritten documents. While the solution supports handwritten documents, the accuracy percentage is not as high as desired. Therefore, it would be preferable if UiPath could focus on improving the accuracy of handwritten documents in their next release. Although they currently support handwritten documents, the accuracy is still low.

Also, the documents for the solution are lengthy, and because of this, I say that the solution should incorporate some video sessions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have experience with UiPath Document Understanding, in which the users are provided with multiple types of Document Understanding and a process-wise range of available documents. Overall, I have been using the solution for three to five years. Also, I am using the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is quite stable, and I am happy with its performance in my programs and processes. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution's scalability with the cloud version is really good. I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.

Around 30-40 people work on UiPath Document Understanding in our company. The extent to which we use the solution, particularly in terms of utilization of bots or document processing, is dependent upon the volume of usage. In other words, if there is an increase in the number of customers, we will likely increase the usage of the solution.

How are customer service and support?

UiPath's technical support is good. Even in emails, they are responsive and helpful. They also have a very good library of troubleshooting documents and other resources. Overall, I am happy with the solution's technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have experience with Automation Anywhere. Also, UiPath Process Mining is a pretty good tool since they have documents which provide its users with a clear understanding. On top of that, they also provide videos. So it's quite easy for an end-user to understand.

How was the initial setup?

Although the solution's initial setup is not overly complex, UiPath could work to make it more understandable for a layperson. They could improve the setup process by creating a more structured flow.

The time needed for deployment varies, depending on factors like the use of cloud services. With a Plug and Play model, UiPath provides cloud services and a link, after which we can begin using the solution. However, deploying on a private cloud may take longer, up to three to five days or even two weeks, depending on the hardware readiness.

In terms of the maintenance of the solution, let's consider a scenario where we need to initiate a programming project to develop a bot that can help in invoice transactions. Typically, this process can take anywhere from three to five weeks and requires at least one project manager who oversees a team member who understands UiPath and business processes. To successfully develop the bot, we need to first analyze and understand the relevant business processes. Once we have derived the business processes, we need to document the solution, including creating a PDD. This document outlines the process and how it will appear once automated. Apart from that, you should have a good set of developers who understand UiPath.

What about the implementation team?

In our organization, we implemented the solution with the help of integrators.

What was our ROI?

The ROI from using UiPath Document Understanding is really good, and we currently see a return on investment of around 40% to 50%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

For the licensing part, in our company, we initially started off with a monthly plan, but yearly plans are also there. Cost-wise, UiPath  Document Understanding is good since it provides flexibility in its pricing. So, smaller firms, especially MSMEs, can opt for monthly or yearly plans based on their budget. As an end user, I wish they reduce the price of their pro version to 300 dollars since UiPath Pro starts somewhere around 400 dollars per month. UiPath's competitor, Automation Anywhere, offers a plan for 99 dollars per month.

What other advice do I have?

I can definitely recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate this product somewhere around eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free UiPath Document Understanding Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: July 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free UiPath Document Understanding Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.