Splunk Reviews

We enjoy the whole solution. It is meeting our requirements, especially the SIM solution. 

The alerts are very user-friendly.

We can easily configure things as required in relation to our use cases.

The search functionality is good. It works like Google. 

Onboarding is quite easy.

The scalability is good.

Product-wise, the performance is good. 

From the commercial point of view, they have to bring down their costs. It's a bit pricey right now. The license is quite expensive. 

Much like the SOAR platform, which has security, orchestration, and automation response, all of that should be part of the SIM solution itself. Currently, it is actually separated.  We understand that we have to integrate a SIM with a SOAR platform, however, if they could combine these two products together, that would be ideal. It would make things easy to implement and make more automation possible to avoid false-positive alerts.

We've been using the solution for the last four years. It's been a while. 

The performance is good. It's stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The scalability of the solution is very good. If a company needs to expand, it can do so. It's easy.

The solution can be expensive. It's not cheap.

We are customers and end-users. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. 

Our company is an IT service provider. We are resellers of Splunk. One of our clients that we monitor is a laboratory that uses this solution.

Splunk is a change management solution. We use the solution as a log collector, and to analyze and provide alerts from the IT instructor.

The product is good, it satisfies our customers.

The price of Splunk is too high for our market.

Our company has been a reseller of Splunk for less than six months.

Splunk is stable.

This is a scalable solution.

We have had no concerns with customer service.

The initial setup of Splunk is somewhat difficult because it was our first time implementing the solution. It was a similar situation to implementing other CM tools like FortiSIEM.

Splunk required two engineers to implement, and we will add another one to maintain the solution.

The prices are complicated as we operate in a small third-world country.

We give support for VMware and other technologies. We purchased Splunk because our customers were asking for our services to take control of the implementation from another company.

If you are considering Splunk and you like what you are seeing; my advice would be to go for it.

I would rate Splunk an 8 out of 10.

There are quite a lot of things that we find useful. Splunk agents are useful and good. Its UI is quite impressive.

Its pricing model and integration with third-party services can be improved. We had faced an issue with integration. 

The alerting feature is currently not available with Splunk, but it is definitely available with Datadog and PagerDuty. They should include this feature.

A few dashboards in Splunk look quite old and are not that modern. They aren't bad, but improving these dashboards will definitely make Splunk more attractive and usable.

I read in a few blog posts that there were a few security incidents related to Splunk agents. So, it can be made more secure.

I have been using this solution for almost two years. I am using its latest version.

It is a stable product.

Splunk is definitely scalable.

I have not interacted with them. Another team is taking care of raising tickets with their technical support.

It is quite simple.

Its pricing model can be improved.

A few years ago, I would have definitely recommended Splunk, but nowadays, better alternatives are available. We are currently exploring a few other alternatives, so I won't recommend Splunk as of now.

I would rate Splunk a seven out of ten.

We are using it for security information and event management (SIEM). We have started to use Splunk recently, and we are in the implementation phase as of now.

The data analysis part is good in Splunk, which is something that I like the most. It is also quite easy to use. Its dashboards, visualizations, and analytics are good.

It currently has limited default rules and customizations. If they can concentrate more on the compliance part and the security information part, it would be helpful. The platform part is good, but it requires many features from the security aspect.

I have been using this solution for a couple of months.

It is absolutely stable.

It is scalable. We have approximately 25 users.

It was easy to install. Its configuration and development are the critical parts, and there are a limited number of people in the market with such a skill set. It takes some time to find people with the right skill set and get it implemented properly. It took approximately three months.

I have a team of a few Splunk consultants who are currently managing it for me. For a mid-sized organization, at least 15 persons are required to manage the entire Splunk instance.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

We use Splunk for log analysis and security monitoring.

Splunk allows us to look at logs from different groups within NIH and see if there's a widespread threat or issue.

The most valuable feature is the log aggregation, being able to scan through all of the logs.

Queries are not always as easy or straightforward as they might be, so it can be difficult to figure out what you need to look for.

In the next release of this product, I would like to see it offer more recommendations as to what needs to be done.

We have been using Splunk for between two and three years.

In terms of stability, the product seems to work just fine. We haven't had any problems with it.

It can be somewhat of a resource hog; some of the scans can take a while. We do plan to increase our usage in the future.

Technical support for Splunk is good.

The initial setup is relatively straightforward.

There were consultants involved in the deployment.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We use a lot of sales metrics. We use machine learning models to provide sales forecasting. We create database connections and run a query on the database. The next step is to place the data into Splunk. We create indexes to get the data into the Splunk dashboard.

The ability to analyze huge amounts of sales data and accurate prediction of sales forecasting is the most valuable feature. 

Splunk needs to be able to hold more days of data. At the moment it only holds three months of data. It needs more views and colors within the dashboard and the ability to have the flexibility to create a user-defined panel.

We have been using Splunk for a year. 

The stability of Splunk is good enough.

I think it's good, other than the ability to hold more than three months of data is lacking.

The setup of Splunk was easy.

There are six people in my team working with Splunk. I am not sure about other users, but we are a mix of data scientists, data engineers, software engineers, IT, and software engineers.

I would rate Splunk as 8 out of 10.

There are many use cases for Splunk, we commonly use it for log management and analytics.

The most valuable feature of Splunk is the management and built-in workflows.

The analytics of Splunk could be improved.

I have been using Splunk for approximately four years.

Splunk is a highly stable solution.

I have found Splunk to be scalable.

We have 15 members of our organization that use this solution.

We used to support a few times and our experience was good. 

I would rate the support from Splunk a four out of five.

I have previously used RSA and I prefer Splunk.

The implementation of slunk is not straightforward. It is of a moderate difficulty level.

We used an integrator to do the implementation.

There is an annual license required to use this solution.

I have evaluated other solutions, such as IBM QRadar.

This solution has good technology.

I rate Splunk an eight out of ten.