Radware DefensePro OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Radware DefensePro is the #4 ranked solution in top Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection tools. PeerSpot users give Radware DefensePro an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Radware DefensePro is most commonly compared to Arbor DDoS: Radware DefensePro vs Arbor DDoS. Radware DefensePro is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 60% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 23% of all views.
Radware DefensePro Buyer's Guide

Download the Radware DefensePro Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2022

What is Radware DefensePro?

DefensePro provides automated DDoS protection from fast-moving, high-volume, encrypted or very-short-duration threats and is part of Radware’s attack mitigation solution. It defends against IoT-based, Burst, DNS and TLS/SSL attacks to secure organizations against emerging network multivector attacks, ransom DDoS campaigns, IoT botnets, phantom floods, and other types of cyberattacks.

DefensePro leverages patented behavior-based detection technology enables organizations to accurately detect attacks in real time while minimizing false positives. Attack signatures can be automatically generated to accurately protect from zero-day and unknown attacks.

Radware DefensePro was previously known as "Radware Defense Pro".

Radware DefensePro Customers

SingleHop

Radware DefensePro Video

Radware DefensePro Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Radware DefensePro pricing:
  • "The pricing is based on the amount of network traffic and the number of packets being inspected."
  • "The initial cost is over $100,000 for one appliance."
  • "The price varies by use case and there are monthly and annual licensing options. If you deploy on-premise, there is an annual license with the amount dependent on the throughput you need and which features you will be using - i.e. IPS, behavioral, etc."
  • Radware DefensePro Reviews

    Filter by:
    Filter Reviews
    Industry
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Company Size
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Job Level
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Rating
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Considered
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Order by:
    Loading...
    • Date
    • Highest Rating
    • Lowest Rating
    • Review Length
    Search:
    Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
    Muyideen  Adewale - PeerSpot reviewer
    Information Systems Management Specialist at Mission Control NOC and Helpdesk Services
    Reseller
    Verbose and descriptive reporting, reliable, and it is easy to scale
    Pros and Cons
    • "The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
    • "This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."

    What is our primary use case?

    I set this solution up for a company who was using it as their edge security solution. It was used to secure the entire infrastructure for the company and helped to protect against DDoS attacks. It was being used in conjunction with a load balancing solution and an open-source firewall running on CentOS.

    I was working with them at the time that this solution was deployed, but I have now moved.

    How has it helped my organization?

    This solution has given us protection against our network being compromised. All of our customers are depending on services that are offered on our network, and DefensePro makes sure that it is protected and customers have access to these services at every point in time.

    What is most valuable?

    The most valuable feature is the DDoS protection.

    The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from. The solution mitigates against these attacks in real-time and you can see where their base path is routing from.

    If for any reason, DefensePro goes offline, it doesn't prevent your infrastructure from functioning or your customers from reaching you. Obviously, the protection will not be there, but your customers can still reach the services that you are hosting internally. This is a good feature because otherwise, it would be a single point of failure for your entire infrastructure.

    What needs improvement?

    This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement.

    Buyer's Guide
    Radware DefensePro
    November 2022
    Learn what your peers think about Radware DefensePro. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2022.
    657,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We implemented this solution in 2015 and it is still working.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    This solution is quite stable. If the device is ever offline then you can still have everybody access the entire infrastructure. This is important in Africa, where power is not always stable. You can just wake up in the morning and discover that the power provider has made a mistake and the entire infrastructure is down. Once the power is restored, this solution boots up and simply begins working again.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Radware DefensePro is highly scalable. You have to imagine the high volume of packet inspection. As you add more links, you want the inspection capability to be able to handle more packets. It is just a matter of buying more licenses that allow you to inspect more packets.

    This solution is part of the security wall that is protecting between 600 and 700 users in a call center services environment. Several call centers across the country are relying on DefensePro as part of their edge security.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support is okay. They are very accessible and they have different levels of services, depending on your plan.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We did use another solution prior to this but we were getting a lot of attacks. This meant that we were paying a lot for bandwidth and our customers were complaining that our services were not happening in a timely manner. Based on this, we felt that our solution was insufficient to protect the infrastructure, which is why we switched to Radware.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took about three days and the plan was executed such that there was minimal disruption to the business services.

    We had been satisfied with the outcome of the simulation and everything we did before actually migrating to the production environment.

    Two staff members, both system administrators, are handling maintenance. The same two people focus primarily on the edge protection devices.

    What about the implementation team?

    The company had two consultants visit from Radware and assist with the deployment. They were very helpful, supportive, and trained us in such a way that we were confident in handling the solution on our own and no longer needed to depend on them.

    All the way from the testing phase to the deployment stage, the Radware consultants were there to support our efforts and everything was successful.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing is based on the amount of network traffic and the number of packets being inspected.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing Radware DefensePro, we did an extensive evaluation of all of the solutions that were available. This is a fantastic solution and it met all of our requirements at the time, which is why it was chosen.

    What other advice do I have?

    The reporting provides us with a lot of interesting and rich data. It allows us to have total control over what is being protected.

    When I first started using this solution, I wondered why it was that the DDoS protection could not be coupled with other edge protection features that I have on my firewall. I questioned why it was that I couldn't have all of the protection in a single box. However, I now realize why it is, from a strategic perspective, and it just makes more sense to have DDoS in its own box.

    The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this solution is that you can't assume that everything is right unless you have insight as to what is currently going on within your infrastructure. You can't just relax and think that everything is okay. It is not a good policy to assume that customers are simply complaining about the services and their experience for the sake of complaining. Rather, consider that something is not right and look into it. This begins with getting the proper solutions in place.

    Overall, I'm happy with this solution and what it has offered so far. The suitability of using DefensePro depends on your budget and your requirements. My advice is to make sure that you have your requirements right and then compare against the other products that are out there. I tend to believe that this solution is fit for all institutions and in my opinion, anyone who implements this will not regret it because it will serve them well.

    While this solution has worked well, I can't say it is perfect because there might be requirements out there that I am unfamiliar with and are not currently being met.

    I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: distributer
    PeerSpot user
    Senior Solutions Architect with 51-200 employees
    MSP
    Top 20
    Offers granular control DDoS with good stability and great protection
    Pros and Cons
    • "They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
    • "The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."

    What is most valuable?

    Cisco partners with Radware and Radware integrates with Firepower very easily.

    The Radware DefensePro module, the virtual module running on Firepower, provides more DDoS protection than, for example, Cloudflare.

    There is a long list of all arrays of the DDoS attempt cross-mitigation that it does. ISP just basically does IP-based DDoS or TCB DDoS protections. Radware goes beyond that, into DNS DDoS, content-based DDoS, et cetera, so it has many levels.

    With Radware, there's a lot more granular control of what DDoS you're looking at in terms of DDoS visibility and protection. 

    It's an on-prem appliance, however, they also have a cloud-based appliance, meaning that copies always are on demand. 

    They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way. 

    There's a lot of flexibility, and a lot of different deployment models available whereas Cloudflare, for example, is only in the cloud. 

    What needs improvement?

    There are customers who don't want Firepower. Let's say they have Sophos or they have Palo Alto. We're trying to re-position Radware DefensePro as a separate appliance in their environment.

    The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market.

    It could be a little bit more user friendly, however, that said, it's pretty decent compared to a lot of other vendors.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've only been dealing with the solution for 30 days or so. It's quite new still. I haven't spent that much time with it.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I've never seen the solution go down or fail. Its performance seems reliable. I'd say the stability is good as I have never seen any issues with it. It's not buggy or glitchy. It doesn't crash or freeze.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution is scalable as far as performance, yes. However, it is not scalable when in a high availability scenario - meaning a lot of my customers have dual data centers. They have dual firewalls. You can configure the product to be high availability as well, however, it requires a customer to have that private link. It is great when you have two high ability firewalls in the same data center, however, then when you have high ability firewalls at different data centers, you can make it work. I have customers who have high ability firewalls, one in each data center, and they have a private, dark fiber link that syncs both firewalls. You can potentially do the same with this solution.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    I haven't gotten a chance to work with technical support. I can't speak to their level of knowledge or their responsiveness in terms of dealing with issues.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I also have experience with Cloudflare. It covers the basics, however, it doesn't cover everything. Whereas, the Firepower that has the Radware DefensePro module in it does DDoS attacks, DNS, content, et cetera.

    Cloudflare is also in the cloud. It's template-based. It's a standard template-based subscription that you get with their DDoS. The same applies to all of their customers.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The solution is expensive. it is not a cheap option.

    The DefensePro is not a cost-effective solution. It's very expensive. I have a lot of schools - K through 12 school districts. They want DDoS protection. When you're comparing it with a cloud service, which is a new emergent thing, a lot of ISPs offer it. However, if customers want to get their own DDoS protection, you have Cloudflare, who I think is Radware's biggest competitor, and they offer everything in the cloud. If you need something on-premises, it's going to be more expensive.

    I did a price comparison between Cloudflare and this product, the three gig model, which is the minimum. What we needed was way too expensive, way over the budget for our client.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    The initial cost is over $100,000 for one appliance. That said, in year two, you won't have that cost. With Radware, you pay upfront, and it's your own. Cloudflare, their main competition, is on the cloud and is $37,000 a year. The costs never come down. If you have Radware for three-plus years, you'll begin to see your costs come down as you don't have to keep repaying for licensing. 

    What other advice do I have?

    I haven't spent a good amount of time with the solution or with implementations just yet. From what I have seen, I would rate it eight out of ten. The main downside is that it is expensive.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Radware DefensePro
    November 2022
    Learn what your peers think about Radware DefensePro. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2022.
    657,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Senior Product Manager - ICT Solutions, Marketing and Development of Cybersecurity at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
    Real User
    Top 20
    Flexible with good functionality and helpful behavioural analysis
    Pros and Cons
    • "Its functionality is very good."
    • "I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."

    What is our primary use case?

    We primarily use the solution for web application firewalls and as hardware.

    What is most valuable?

    I can only distinguish Radware DefensePro from Netscout AED, which doesn't have such a protection network, behavior analysis, intrusion prevention, and maybe anti-bot modules. This product is more advanced than Netscout AED. However, I haven't the knowledge of how it looks in comparison, for example, to F5 or Fortinet appliances or others, as I didn't do RFI and RFP. The most important thing for me right now in the Radware portfolio, is that Radware went to the cloud and has a flexible model based on virtual machines that can be delivered in our data center model, which could be delivered via the public cloud. That’s the big advantage of Radware, from my perspective.

    Its functionality is very good.

    The behavioral analysis is of very good quality.

    What needs improvement?

    I started from scratch, from medium customers to bigger customers, and then maybe smaller ones. I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better. For example, one gigabit of protected bandwidth, two gigabits, three gigabits, and so on. Right now, it's two, four, and six, something like that. It depends on the appliance, of course, as Defense Code 6 is the smaller one and next is 10 or 12. However, in general, the granularity could be better.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I’ve used the solution for five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The product is scalable.

    We have 12 to 15 people on the solution.

    How are customer service and support?

    I don’t directly deal with technical support. That is the responsibility of others.

    How was the initial setup?

    I'm not a technical guy. From my perspective, the initial setup is not easy. However, it's not hard. Someone who would like to have a good security policy should have enough knowledge to configure it using the security policy. The knowledge is essential since it's not possible to implement a security policy without knowledge about the traffic, including what kind of traffic, what kind of application, what kind of parameters, et cetera. It's not a hammer. It's a security appliance. For our people, it's not as hard since we use it. We know how to use it. It's maybe more important to integrate it with additional systems like a CM.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The solution offers good quality for the price.

    I prefer low investment expenditures. I prefer paying less at the beginning of the project. After the customer base starts growing, I can pay more.

    This solution is moderately priced. I would rate it three out of five.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    To deliver to our current customers, we had to buy something new. However, in the future, we would like to check what kind of opportunities are on the market.

    What other advice do I have?

    We are in the middle of buying the newest DefensePro. We switched to the new technology as the old one is the end of life and end of support. That's why we have to buy a new DefensePro.

    It's in our internal infrastructure, so it's in our network. It's not a data center, for example, Amazon, Azure, or Google Cloud.

    With this model, it's all one. We would like to extend it in the near future, maybe to be more flexible. I am in the middle of the project and in the middle of how to distinguish protection against DDoS attacks and have Layer 7 and web application firewalls. In our offering, we combined these two areas into one service. One part is DDoS protection against 7th layer DDoS attacks, and the second is web application firewalls. Right now, I would like to work on how to distinguish to maybe separate it. I don't know what it will look like right now.

    I’d rate the solution overall an eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Network Security Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
    Real User
    Top 20
    Good configuration capabilities, good stability, and integrates well with Cisco
    Pros and Cons
    • "The product integrates well with Cisco."
    • "The dashboard could be updated."

    What is our primary use case?

    We primarily use the solution for preventing distributed denial of service, or DDoS attacks.

    What is most valuable?

    The ease of installation is the solution's most valuable aspect.

    The configuration is very simple and straightforward.

    The stability of the product is very good.

    The product integrates well with Cisco.

    What needs improvement?

    We are currently using the solution in conjunction with Cisco Firepower. In terms of the defense devices, I would like to see an improvement within the implementation and upgrade phases.

    The dashboard could be updated. It's just the one that is used with Internet Explorer 11 and with outdated Java. It's only a small part of their web interface and is not the entire dashboard.

    The implementation process could be a bit better.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've been using the solution for about two years at this point.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    It's a very stable product. Once you gather all policies and configure all necessary policies, everything works fine.

    There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's been reliable in terms of performance.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We've never really tried to scale the solution. I can't speak to how easy it would be to expand it out if you needed to.

    We have maybe a thousand users, and it's a very complex environment.

    We'd like to maybe just increase the speed in the future - the speed of the WIFI link and internet service provider's uplinks.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Technical support has been fine overall. They are very easy to work with. We're satisfied with the level of support we've been given overall.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We did not previously use a different solution. This is our first tool for this particular purpose.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup is not complex. It's very straightforward and very easy. The configuration process, as well, is excellent and very straightforward. A company shouldn't face any issues when they are implementing the solution.

    That said, we have a pretty complex environment. Our implementation process could have been easier.

    The deployment process was very fast and took about one week.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    There is a different team the deals with pricing, licensing, and subscriptions. I don't have any knowledge as to the overall costs.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We did not evaluate other options. We are a Cisco Gold partner, and this is their recommended and compatible product that works specifically with Cisco Firepower Threat Defense.

    What other advice do I have?

    We are users of the solution.

    We've been mostly very happy with the product. I would rate it at a nine out of ten. They just need better implementation and to work together with Cisco for faster and better results.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Private Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Security Specialist at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
    Real User
    Top 20
    Easy to set up while offering good security from DDoS attacks and reasonable pricing
    Pros and Cons
    • "The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
    • "There needs to be more reporting."

    What is our primary use case?

    The solution is primarily used to protect our cockpit internet line which is serving our cockpit application.

    What is most valuable?

    The solution offers a keen, tight service. It's very good at protecting us from DDoS attacks. It's very good at cleaning our pipeline when support routes traffic through. 

    The product has been stable. The performance is pretty good.

    The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive.

    It's my understanding the initial setup isn't too hard.

    What needs improvement?

    The solution needs to improve its communication with users. Last year, there was a lot of silence on their end. There have been communication delays we would rather not deal with.

    There needs to be more reporting. I'd like to be able to see more information on traffic or the system's data. Right now, information is lacking, from what I can tell.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been at my current company for one year now, and have used it since I started. However, I can't speak to how long the company has used the solution before I arrived. 

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The solution is stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's been good so far.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We may have limitations on the scalability due to our own model. I can't speak to its general scalability.

    At the moment, we do not have plans to increase usage in the future.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Technical support is okay, however, it could be better. We're not directly operating the device, and therefore don't have too much access to them, however, there have been some communication breakdowns.

    How was the initial setup?

    My understanding is that the initial setup is not overly complex. I've heard it's straightforward. I'm not actually the person that does the implementation, and therefore I don't have direct experience in the matter. The equipment seems pretty simple and straightforward.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Currently, the pricing is quite reasonable. We have no complaints when it comes to the cost of the solution.

    What other advice do I have?

    We are just a customer and end-user. We don't have a business relationship with Radware.

    I'm not sure which version of the solution we're currently using.

    I'm not sure if we intend to switch products. In the future, that will depend on if there are any new functions or features, or if the price of a new product is better.

    In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been satisfied with the solution and its capabilities for the most part.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    AliasgarRangwala - PeerSpot reviewer
    System Engineer at Check Point Software Technologies
    Real User
    SSL, DNS and HTTP are all valuable features; lacks integration with third parties
    Pros and Cons
    • "Technologically simple and effective."
    • "APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."

    What is our primary use case?

    I'm a security engineer.

    What is most valuable?

    In terms of the environment that I work in, the SSL, DNS, and HTTP are all valuable features. This is a very technologically simple and effective solution. 

    What needs improvement?

    There are no issues on the hardware front, but on the management front, the APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information. If I want to check on TCP traffic or any kind of traffic flowing between a source and a destination, I should be able to access it in real-time. For now, I have to check four or five options, then go for a TCPDUMP, download it, and then open it. It takes too long and is a complex process. There should be an option in the management server or on the GUI, to simplify things for users. It should just be a matter of putting in the source and the destination IP, to see the latency for that particular destination and what's going on.

    Because Radware does not have its own control plane software, it can only integrate with specific products. They should aim to integrate with third parties such as Genie, Nokia, and Arbor DMS. It's currently very limited.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've been using this solution for three years. 

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The solution is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Scalability is not an issue because the product comes with a scalable license. 

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support wasn't great but it was reasonable. 

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was very straightforward. Maintenance requirements depend on the size of the environment. If it's deployed in an ISP environment then it requires one or two administrators. If it's a single appliance for an enterprise environment, then one person is enough for maintenance.

    What other advice do I have?

    I rate this solution seven out of 10. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    RaynielBadiola - PeerSpot reviewer
    Technical Manager at Secur Links
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Secure and reliable but I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard
    Pros and Cons
    • "This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
    • "I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard. Right now, you are required to buy tools in order to have graphical representation for your monitoring."

    What is our primary use case?

    This solution is used to to block and mitigate cyber attacks. We have a lot of clients that use this solution including banks, corporates, and governments.

    What is most valuable?

    This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment.

    The solution is also very secure and reliable and can be integrated with many different platforms. The configurations are very easy when considering the graphical user interface.

    What needs improvement?

    I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard. Right now, you are required to buy tools in order to have a graphical representation for your monitoring.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been selling this solution for a few years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    This solution is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    This solution has an entry level throughput that is extremely scalable. 

    How are customer service and support?

    The support provided is very knowledgeable. We do not need to use them much since, as a distributor, we are trained and certified on the platform.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was straightforward and much easier than the AppWall. You are able to install this solution on-premise in three to five days. There is a baseline that is based on the traffic of your network that can be adjusted and configured to your specific needs.

    The whole process can be completed by a single engineer.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The price varies by use case and there are monthly and annual licensing options. If you deploy on-premise, there is an annual license with the amount dependent on the throughput you need and which features you will be using - i.e. IPS, behavioral, etc.

    What other advice do I have?

    This is a great product for any organization looking to be protected from cyber attacks or hackers.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
    PeerSpot user
    Intrusion Detection Specialist at Installazioni Impianti S.p.A
    User
    Intuitive graphical interface, detailed information on attacks, and can scheduling updates
    Pros and Cons
    • "The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
    • "They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use the solution for the protection of websites and institutional services. 

    How has it helped my organization?

    The product is very effective and performs well on devices. 

    What is most valuable?

    It's got a very intuitive graphical interface, very deep detailed information on attacks, and has the possibility of scheduling updates.  

    What needs improvement?

    They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage (currently it is 100). I manage a huge network and I am forced to use two and this is very uncorfortable. 

    In the event of a power failure, it would be nice for the device to turn on again automatically. When managing a very large network it requires to have to contact the offices for a manual restart.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used the solution for ten years. 

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    We've had good impressions of stability.

    How are customer service and support?

    Sometimes it is useless in the analysis, especially if you specify that the device turns off or restarts by itself. It would take a quick way to bypass the initial analysis process and go directly to sending a new DefensePro.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We did not use a previous solution.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was easy.

    What about the implementation team?

    The technicians I have contacted over the years for various problems have all been very helpful and qualified.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We did not evaluate other options. 

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Radware DefensePro Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: November 2022
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Radware DefensePro Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.