CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Nolio Release Automation | 1.9% |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 30.7% |
| GitLab | 29.7% |
| Other | 37.7% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Release Automation | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Nolio Release Automation vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Nolio Release Automation vs GitLab | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Nolio Release Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform | Mar 26, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | 4.2 | 29.7% | 97% | 90 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 30.7% | 95% | 137 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 34 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
Nolio Release Automation was previously known as CA Release Automation.
CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco.
Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital | 5.0 | I've used Nolio Release Automation extensively for three years; it's user-friendly, scalable, and effective for deployments, though its market presence is limited. The new 6.9 version offers improved performance, integration, and support over the older 6.6 version. |
| DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital | 4.0 | I primarily use Nolio Release Automation for production deployments, including web apps. Its architecture and user-friendly GUI are valuable, but it lacks learning materials for beginners. I've used OpenShift and IBM UrbanCode Deploy, but Nolio offers distinct advantages. |
| Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I find Nolio's graphical flow view valuable, and its setup was easy. It's stable and scalable, but I wish for better Kubernetes, cloud, and Active Directory support, plus improved parameter handling. I rate it 6/10. |
| CA Lisa Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I find this solution essential for virtualizing services, especially liking its CA Application Insight. While configuration is complex, it's very stable and scalable. I highly recommend this great tool, despite the difficult setup, rating it 9/10. |
| Software Engineering Director at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | CA Release Automation improved our deployment speed but had performance issues and painful upgrades. It's stable, but CA isn't investing in it, pushing Automic instead. I wouldn't recommend it for new investment due to future support concerns, despite its current functionality. |
| Tech Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I recommend CA Release Automation. Its easy GUI and stability make our automated deployments standardized and error-free. Setup was straightforward, and support is good. My only suggestion: broader automation capabilities. |
| SQA Manager at a tech services company | 4.5 | I found this tool exceptional for graphical workflow design and managing large, complex deployments across diverse environments. It’s scalable and offers good support, but its high cost and current ad-hoc integration for new technologies are drawbacks. |
| Manager - IT at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I found built-in action packs valuable for auto-deployment and rollbacks. However, the product is expensive and requires agents on all servers. Stability issues with agents disconnecting weekly were a concern, despite good customer support. |