IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics is #1 ranked solution in top Customer Data Analysis tools, #3 ranked solution in top Customer Experience Management tools, and #5 ranked solution in top Web Analytics tools. PeerSpot users give IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics an average rating of 10 out of 10. IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics is most commonly compared to Google Analytics: IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics vs Google Analytics. IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 68% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 28% of all views.
What is IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics?

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics allows you to view your sites and apps from the customer perspective to discover opportunities. It provides a seamless, end-to-end view of the customer experience to understand and optimize every journey and gives you the insights you need to resolve issues, boost conversions and maximize lifetime customer value.

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics was previously known as IBM Coremetrics Digital Marketing Optimization aSuite, IBM Tealeaf, IBM Coremetrics Web Analytics.

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics Customers

IMM, Whogohost Ltd., Stonyfield, Grupo WTW, Big Scary Cranium, Brockenhurst College, SiteMinis, RCI Banque Espana

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics Video

IBM Watson Customer Experience Analytics Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Mouhanad Chebib - PeerSpot reviewer
Techincal Pre-sales Specialist - Collaboration & Customer Engagement Solutions at GBM
Top 10Leaderboard
Great granular DOM level with excellent analytics and reporting
Pros and Cons
  • "The ability to create meaningful reports and dashboards to tell stories."
  • "The technical side requires development skills during implementation. This could be simplified."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is to analyze the behavior of customers across digital channels - how people interact on websites or mobile applications, and what issues they may have. It also analyzes those behaviors on the business channels. For example, it can check how a customer is moving through the shopping experience on a retail site. Are they focusing only at the top or were they trying to zoom in on a product and were not successful? Were they trying to pinch out some text because it wasn't visible on the mobile application? All those things can be tracked and utilized to generate meaningful reports. This includes for marketers who can improve customer experience, for developers to improve the applications, and for security use cases to avoid fraud because it can detect if a site or application is being used fraudulently. We are partners of IBM and I'm an enterprise applications consultant.

What is most valuable?

There are three valuable areas: One of them is the granular DOM level where it captures behaviors on the application. Another is the analytics, because you don't need to provide it with a rule to identify the issues, it will analyze the usage of all the customers accessing that site and see if there are any abnormalities and it will identify unexpected changes in the pattern and that there is something wrong that needs to be checked out. That is extremely useful. Finally, the ability to create meaningful reports and dashboards to tell stories. The reports enable you to re-target customers if they've had any problems. 

What needs improvement?

An area that can be improved is on the technical side where you identify an event. Currently it requires more development skills during implementation. It's not very friendly for business users trying to set or configure the behaviors or events that are being tracked. It would be better if business users could easily configure events and start capturing them without needing to have a technical background. They wouldn't need to share use cases beforehand and to take on implementation partners to help roll out use cases. It opens up the door for further innovation by the whole company.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for five years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a pretty stable solution. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is often used by small customers who then grow and scale it to their needs. Maintenance staff isn't required if it's hosted on cloud. If it's on-premise, it requires basic maintenance that any kind of data center administrator can do. 

How are customer service and support?

The support is provided by Acoustics, because the product is by Watson. The IBM or Acoustics support for these products has been very good, they're available 24/7. They are always responsive communicating when there's any kind of down time. They're also available across multiple channels including phone and support portals. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I previously used Crazy Egg, which covered a subset of the capabilities we have here but it wasn't built as an enterprise solution. It's suitable for a small business, whereas this solution allows you to actually be extremely detailed in the events that are captured on the dome level. Crazy Egg doesn't give you all the extra features of knowing what is actually happening on the screen, doing the full session replays and carrying out detailed reporting including dashboarding and integrating with third party tools. Watson has got a direct connectivity to many other applications in the ecosystem of the data. It's a strong feature compared to what is offered by other competitors like Crazy Egg. Watson is built for enterprise.

How was the initial setup?

For the public cloud option the initial setup is straightforward, because it's only a matter of provisioning for deployment. On-premise is a complex setup depending on the servers, where you're running your websites or mobile applications. It requires setting up some agents that will intercept all the traffic so it can collect the behaviors and interactions happening on every page. This is where the complexity is and you need to accommodate for storage. The more our website is accessed the more scalable deployment infrastructure is required. An implementation of the on-premise option can take between one to three months.  Implementation can be carried out internally or by using the expertise of partners that can provide those services. There's no ongoing requirement in terms of maintenance. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost is based on the number of traffic and events and it is tiered pricing. The higher the volume, the lower the price becomes per event. The number of users is irrelevant, it's all about how much traffic is being captured and analyzed. It's not a solution that is usually used or deployed across many employees in the company, only those who need to access it, and the prices are based on the interactions. It expands relative to the traffic.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend this solution and would advise anyone implementing or adopting this product to have in mind multiple use cases, some that are related to maximizing revenue, some that are related to providing better customer experience, some that are related to avoiding fraud or capturing any security related usages on their site. Those are three main areas. I've learned that there is more than one way to use this platform. You can let your imagination think about a use case and if it's related to customer behavior on the district channels, it can most probably be done. It can also be expanded to offline channels using the right integration so for example if you want to be capturing customer journey through all of the interaction points that are online and offline, that is possible.  I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator