Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Zscaler Client Connector comparison

Trellix and Zscaler are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Trellix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5, while Zscaler is ranked #52 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 81% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

3,273 Views
2,549 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Zscaler Client Connector

Read 2 Zscaler Client Connector reviews

119 Views
87 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Zscaler Client Connector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security and Zscaler Client Connector are key players in the cybersecurity space. While Trellix has an advantage in pricing and support, Zscaler stands out with its superior features.

Features: Trellix ENS offers robust threat prevention and comprehensive data protection, catering well to large-scale endpoint deployments. In contrast, Zscaler Client Connector is designed for secure access and integration with cloud environments, providing strong capabilities for remote work. The main distinction is Trellix's focus on endpoint management and Zscaler's emphasis on cloud-based security solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ENS is known for its straightforward deployment process, supporting organizations with complex IT infrastructures. It provides extensive customer support. Zscaler prioritizes a streamlined deployment, making it ideal for environments seeking quick cloud integration, and aims for a hassle-free setup.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ENS offers competitive pricing with a focus on long-term ROI through comprehensive security management and scalability. Zscaler, although it might require a higher initial investment, offers a high ROI via advanced cloud features, which can justify the cost for businesses looking for a cloud-first security strategy.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (26th)

Zscaler Client Connector

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

52nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Carlos Snel

Director at Aquila ICT Solutions

Allows our IT department to easily analyze any connection issues

There is room for improvement regarding the price of Zscaler Client Connector, as it is one of the most expensive solutions available. Additionally, more data centers are required globally to reduce latency, especially in areas like South America and Africa, though this does not directly relate to the Client Connector.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"The technical support services are good."

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."

"FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

"I'd rate the solution nine out of ten."

"The solution operates in the background seamlessly without the user noticing."

"Zscaler Client Connector is quite scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine or ten out of ten."

Cons

"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."

"We would like to solution to offer better security."

"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."

"We'd like better UI on the management screen."

"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."

"The solution can be expensive."

"Search feature could be made more user-friendly."

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

"The stability of Zscaler Client Connector needs improvement, as it often disconnects and reconnects."

"There is room for improvement regarding the price of Zscaler Client Connector, as it is one of the most expensive solutions available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler Client Connector?

Zscaler Client Connector is notably costly, with pricing rated at five out of ten in terms of affordability, reflecting the premium pricing of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler Client Connector?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zscaler Client Connector?

The primary use case for Zscaler Client Connector is acting as a proxy for security. It ensures a secure connection through Zscaler, integrating the proxy with the necessary security level for cont...

See all answers

Comparisons

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 100% of the time

More Zscaler Client Connector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Zscaler Client Connector product report

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

No data available

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Zscaler Client Connector streamlines secure remote access by addressing security needs with scalable solutions, improving network performance. It is crucial for businesses seeking comprehensive network protection and seamless connectivity.

Zscaler Client Connector provides secure remote access enhancements by integrating security capabilities within a unified platform. This ensures that users remain protected while accessing applications or data from any location. The deployment of Zscaler Client Connector enables organizations to efficiently manage remote workforce security, enhance network visibility, and reduce latency issues. By refining user access controls, businesses can minimize risks and safeguard sensitive information without compromising performance.

What are the most important features of Zscaler Client Connector?

Seamless Integration: Simplifies the integration with existing IT infrastructure for quick deployment.
Cloud Scalability: Offers scalable solutions to accommodate growing network demands.
Real-time Visibility: Provides detailed insights into network traffic and user activity.
Advanced Threat Protection: Blocks malware and unauthorized access attempts.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Security: Enhanced protection reduces the risk of data breaches.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by reducing reliance on traditional infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Streamlines connectivity to boost productivity.
User Satisfaction: Simplifies remote access, enhancing user experience.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, integrating Zscaler Client Connector ensures compliance with stringent data protection standards while maintaining operational efficiency. The scalable design allows businesses to adapt to varying demands, providing a robust security framework suitable for dynamic environments.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.