Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection ( /products/withsecure-elements-endpoint-protection-reviews ) is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."

"The extendability is great."

"The independent modules are very good."

"The stability has been great."

"MVISION offers decent protection."

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

Cons

"The solution can be expensive."

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."

"Continued available training is important for people coming in to use it."

"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."

"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."

"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"The product pricing is high."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"The price is comparable."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 36% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Information Not Available

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection