Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option comparison

Trellix and Veritas are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5, while Veritas is ranked #55 with an average rating of 5.0. Trellix holds a 1.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to Veritas’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution.

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 55 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

3,995 Views
3,141 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Veritas Desktop and Laptop ...

Read 1 Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option review

86 Views
46 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Veritas Desktop and Laptop ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP).

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,649 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th)

Veritas Desktop and Laptop ...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

55th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Nuno Maia

Backup administrator at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Though support needs improvement, the tool is easy to maintain and scale up

Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option's server and GUI are of an old style that could be improved. In the solution, the number of errors we have are not so intuitive to fix, because of which an older person like me needs to be here, making it the last and worst thing of the solution. The support team of the product lacks skills and needs improvement. I would have mentioned that Veritas needs to make their solution available in the cloud, but I am sure they already have it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."

"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."

"I recommend Trellix Endpoint Security to others as it seems like one of the industry standards and is fairly stable."

"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."

"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."

"Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware."

"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."

"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

"The solution provides an easy GUI allowing you to use it as a backup and restore your computer whenever you want, following administrator rules."

Cons

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."

"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."

"The solution can be expensive."

"A policy-editing console should be added."

"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."

"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."

"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."

"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

"The support team of the product lacks skills and needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

What do you like most about Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option?

The solution provides an easy GUI allowing you to use it as a backup and restore your computer whenever you want, following administrator rules.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option?

We use it as backup software for our desktops and computers. It works as an agent to protect the computers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 8% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2025

Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option report

Download Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option product report

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

No data available

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option is utilized for automated data backup, ensuring critical files are securely stored with reliable performance in protecting data from potential loss due to device failure or accidents.

Users of Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option find it reliable for data backup with easy deployment across multiple devices. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems and offers centralized management, ensuring consistent backups. This tool is highly valued for its capability to store and retrieve data efficiently while maintaining data integrity. Users also note the flexible scheduling options, robust security features, minimal system impact during operation, and detailed reporting. High levels of support further enhance user experience, though there are suggestions for faster customer support response times and improved performance with large data sets.

What are the key features of Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option?

Automated data backup: Ensures critical files are securely stored without manual intervention.
Easy deployment: Simplifies setup across multiple devices.
Seamless integration: Works well with existing systems.
Centralized management: Maintains consistent backups across devices.
Flexible scheduling: Offers options to schedule backups according to user needs.
Robust security: Protects data with advanced security features.
Minimal system impact: Operates efficiently without affecting system performance.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive reports on backup status and performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in the reviews?

Reliable data protection: Prevents data loss due to device failure or accidents.
Efficient data retrieval: Quick and easy data recovery when needed.
Consistent backups: Maintains regular and reliable backups across devices.
Enhanced security: Advanced security features safeguard data.
User support: High levels of support improve user satisfaction, although response times could improve.

Veritas Desktop and Laptop Option is employed in various industries to ensure critical data backup and security. Educational institutions rely on it to protect academic records and research data. Healthcare providers use it to safeguard patient information and comply with regulations. Financial organizations depend on it to secure transaction records and sensitive data, while law firms use it to protect confidential client information. Its versatility and robust features make it suitable for any industry where data integrity and security are paramount.

Veritas

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

852,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.