Symantec Endpoint Security Complete and WatchGuard EPDR are two prominent endpoint security solutions. WatchGuard EPDR appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat detection and response capabilities.
Features: Symantec Endpoint Security Complete offers robust malware protection, endpoint detection and response, and an integrated firewall. WatchGuard EPDR is recognized for superior threat hunting, AI-driven analytics, and automated remediation. Users find WatchGuard's threat intelligence features more valuable.
Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security Complete users report issues with high resource usage and occasional false positives. WatchGuard EPDR users highlight the need for a more intuitive reporting system and better integration capabilities. Symantec requires performance optimization, while WatchGuard needs enhanced reporting tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is considered complex to deploy, often requiring professional services. Customers appreciate Symantec’s comprehensive support. WatchGuard EPDR is noted for its simplified deployment and straightforward setup procedures, although some users suggest improvements in customer service responsiveness. WatchGuard is easier to deploy, but Symantec offers more robust support.
Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is associated with higher setup costs but provides good ROI through extensive security features. WatchGuard EPDR offers a more competitive pricing structure with an efficient cost-to-performance balance. Users perceive higher upfront costs for Symantec justified by its comprehensive security measures, while WatchGuard is valued for cost-effectiveness and quick ROI.
I can say that knowing you have a product like WatchGuard EPDR that's working 24/7 to help protect students in a school is good for ROI.
I don't know the current situation with Broadcom, however, it was good when I was involved.
They create a case, tell me to refer to articles, and if not resolved, they take a remote session to solve the issue.
The technical support from WatchGuard would rate at about an eight on a scale of 1 to 10, where one is the worst technical support and 10 is the best technical support.
Technical support for Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is provided by the reseller, and they also do preventive maintenance yearly.
WatchGuard EPDR is very competitive regarding its scalability.
Mac OS upgrades would break them before new versions were available.
WatchGuard EPDR is a very stable solution and is not resource intensive.
It is very stable with no hanging problems.
The stability is approximately a seven to eight out of ten.
The mobile device management was not unified with the other endpoint management, creating structural issues.
They could improve the user interface.
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement.
An area for improvement would be the software deployment to seamlessly deploy software packages across multiple machines simultaneously.
Other firewalls allow adding categories and in-app controls which WatchGuard currently lacks.
It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.
The pricing is slightly high, but the product quality justifies it.
Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.
I have both the antivirus and EDR features constantly, allowing my team's customers to conduct detailed analyses of where attacks have occurred or if any malicious files are present, which devices or files have been targeted.
Fortinet Endpoint Protection provides more features compared to other solutions.
The cloud of WatchGuard lets me see all my devices, updating me to minute levels with detailed information, such as patch status and vulnerabilities.
It prevents issues with Trojans and encryption Trojans, providing efficiency in network oversight.
The software deployment is also a key aspect of the solution.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| WatchGuard EPDR | 2.1% |
| Symantec Endpoint Security Complete | 0.7% |
| Other | 97.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Symantec Endpoint Security (SES) Complete delivers comprehensive protection for all your traditional and mobile devices across the entire attack chain. Symantec endpoint innovations include behavioral isolation, Active Directory security, and Threat Hunter technologies to protect your endpoints against sophisticated threats and targeted attacks. For higher return-on-investment and lower total cost of ownership, this single-agent solution supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-based deployments.
EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
