Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Symantec Directory vs Zulu Embedded comparison

The compared Broadcom and Azul Systems solutions aren't in the same category. Broadcom is ranked #5 in DS , and holds a 7.2% mindshare in the category. Azul Systems is ranked #22 in AIS , and holds a 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.
Symantec Directory
Read 2 Symantec Directory reviews
  • 16 Views
  • 11 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Zulu Embedded
  • 175 Views
  • 132 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Symantec Directory and Zulu Embedded based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity, Oracle, Optimal IdM and others in Directory Servers.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Directory Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Directory
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Symantec Directory
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Directory Servers (5th)
Zulu Embedded
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Symantec Directory and Zulu Embedded aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Symantec Directory is designed for Directory Servers and holds a mindshare of 7.2%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Zulu Embedded, on the other hand, focuses on Application Infrastructure, holds 0.5% mindshare, down 1.0% since last year.
Directory Servers
Application Infrastructure
 

Featured Reviews

it_user558261 - PeerSpot reviewer
We use it for internal-facing and external-facing website security.
The most valuable feature of this product is the enterprise-based security and the reliability that it comes with. Most of the people in this industry are using this product, so you are a victim of it since you need to use what everybody else is using and adopt it to your basic criteria.
Read full review
Use Zulu Embedded?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Directory Servers solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Directory
April 2025
Symantec Directory reportDownload Symantec Directory product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
May 2025
Zulu Embedded reportDownload Zulu Embedded product report
 

Also Known As

CA Directory
No data available
 

Overview

CA Directory is an easy-to-manage directory service with superior performance for read and write operations, transparent and distributed replication across any number of servers and automatic recovery for seamless failover and failback. With these market-leading capabilities, CA Directory provides a mature, standards-based platform for your application infrastructure that allows you to reduce your costs while still delivering superior user experience and improved business agility.
Broadcom

Open Source Java for IoT & Embedded Systems.

Tired of high Java licensing costs, restrictive terms of use and proprietary vendor lock-in?

Azul is the world's largest commercial vendor delivering multi-platform, 100% open source OpenJDK builds targeting the embedded, IoT, and maker communities.

Azul Systems
 

Sample Customers

DBS
V2COMM

We monitor all Directory Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.