SonicWall Capture Client and Symantec Endpoint Security Complete compete in the cybersecurity space. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete has the upper hand due to its advanced feature set and perceived value for money.
Features: SonicWall Capture Client provides comprehensive protection, ease of use, and efficient customer support. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete offers advanced threat protection, detailed reporting, and an extensive feature set.
Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client needs more frequent updates, a more intuitive interface, and better multi-OS support. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete could improve response times, offer more support for various operating systems, and simplify its interface for easier use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client is straightforward to deploy and has efficient customer service for quick issue resolution. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, while more complex to deploy, provides extensive support resources that cater better to larger enterprises.
Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client is cost-effective, offering quick ROI, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, while more expensive, justifies its cost with comprehensive features and strong performance, delivering superior ROI.
Partners can purchase single endpoints at prices equivalent to 1,000-endpoint deals, providing an advantage for managed security service provider partners.
While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels.
I don't know the current situation with Broadcom, however, it was good when I was involved.
There are no restrictions on the scalability of SonicWall Capture Client.
The installation process is straightforward, requiring only five pilot installations to enable customers to complete the remaining installations independently.
SonicWall Capture Client is accessed via cloud-based management console.
Mac OS upgrades would break them before new versions were available.
One of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier licenses within a single tenant, which can be problematic when users need to deploy different licenses.
XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall.
The RAM usage is higher compared to SentinelOne, utilizing approximately 150 megabytes of memory.
The mobile device management was not unified with the other endpoint management, creating structural issues.
They could improve the user interface.
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
Machine learning is particularly effective due to SonicWall sandboxing's threat intelligence database of approximately 7.1 billion entries.
One is that users can use the sandbox of SonicWall, which is called Capture ATP for free.
I have both the antivirus and EDR features constantly, allowing my team's customers to conduct detailed analyses of where attacks have occurred or if any malicious files are present, which devices or files have been targeted.
Fortinet Endpoint Protection provides more features compared to other solutions.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Symantec Endpoint Security Complete | 0.6% |
SonicWall Capture Client | 0.6% |
Other | 98.8% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 6 |
SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.
Symantec Endpoint Security (SES) Complete delivers comprehensive protection for all your traditional and mobile devices across the entire attack chain. Symantec endpoint innovations include behavioral isolation, Active Directory security, and Threat Hunter technologies to protect your endpoints against sophisticated threats and targeted attacks. For higher return-on-investment and lower total cost of ownership, this single-agent solution supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-based deployments.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.