SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Sumo Logic Observability comparison

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Sumo Logic Observability

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (6th), Active Directory Management (8th)

Sumo Logic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

65th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (45th), AIOps (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sumo Logic Observability is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor	1.1%
Sumo Logic Observability	0.6%
Other	98.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

NikhilKalwint

Technical Specialist at ServiceIO

Monitoring over a thousand systems has improved decision making and operational visibility

From an advantage perspective, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is comparatively cheaper from a commercial point of view. It is easy to install and configure, very user-friendly, and quick to get up and running, allowing you to see the early value adds in your organization. It is compatible with most technologies for monitoring with very few chances of incompatibility. Configuration also allows us to monitor all the technical parameters we are looking for, making it a very good experience for us. The alerting feature in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is a main advantage, as it alerts based on threshold breaches and can raise tickets to the ticketing system, send SMS, and email notifications, allowing engineers to work on those tickets to resolve issues and avoid further impact. The visibility into server health is a beneficial feature that I am utilizing. We widely use various application performance metrics in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor such as database monitoring and server monitoring, which are quite good enough for any monitoring solution. We utilize the customizable dashboards in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor.

Read full review

Shamshir Nangla

Site Reliability Engineer at LHV Bank

Getting up and running is easy, even for a newbie but management of searches definitely needs improvement

Operational effectiveness with regards to when there's an issue, when there's a reactive issue, people are able to, or as well as proactively, actually, because we use their PagerDuty integrations. We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening. With those same alerts, obviously, with that platform, you can use it to reactively start looking at troubleshooting issues as they're happening right then and there or incidents. So it's been very, very good for alerting and for troubleshooting issues. For predicting issues before they happen, it is not very good. They have a feature called anomaly detection, but I think it's quite premature compared to other stuff out there. So it's good for alerts and for troubleshooting operational effectiveness. When your operations are down or segregated, it's perfect because it will help you diagnose the issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."

"I find it to be a strong product suite, particularly when you need a comprehensive monitoring tool."

"SolarWinds fit the bill because it gave many possibilities in monitoring with a good amount of out of the box capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is its powerful monitoring capabilities."

"It is scalable."

"The recommendations are a life saver."

"It's good at monitoring system-specific things like ports, services."

"SolarWinds allows network administrators to easily monitor the network by customizing the pages to see what exactly is needed, in addition to the deep statistics shown for nodes and interfaces like response time, packet loss, interface CRC, interface errors, as well as the rich graphs for all network elements."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pros

"Sumo Logic Observability presents a range of valuable features, including well-crafted dashboards and a diverse selection of helpful apps. However, personally, I don't hold a favorable opinion of the solution. While I don't struggle with writing queries, my main difficulty lies in recruiting competent individuals and ensuring their proficiency in utilizing the solution. This often leads to additional challenges and complexities. From my perspective, when compared to Microsoft Sentinel or even Splunk, Sumo Logic Observability has a steeper learning curve. One contributing factor to this disparity is the solution's long existence in the market compared to Synlogic. Nevertheless, I acknowledge that there are capable and knowledgeable professionals employed at Sumo Logic Observability. The effectiveness of the solution largely depends on how it is integrated into your internal operations and environment. Its utility and benefits can vary significantly. It is worth noting that organizations like the NSA and, I believe, the CIA used it in the past, primarily for rapidly searching and analyzing large volumes of data. To leverage its capabilities effectively, you must determine how to tailor it to your specific needs."

"Alerting and consistency are key. We have different tiers with log collectors, and continuous querying provides near-real-time updates. It's almost like instantly when something happens, like pending transactions or error fees. This helps reduce incident resolution time compared to waiting for thresholds on other platforms. We can continue logging in with them seamlessly and quickly get into action."

"The product is easy to learn."

"I have not seen any stability issues in the product."

"We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening."

"The solution allows multiple groups to converge on a unified platform, allowing for different utilization by various teams."

Cons

"An additional feature that would improve this solution is the ability to complete root cause analysis."

"Some custom applications cannot be monitored, and a lot more applications need to be included."

"Reporting is the only thing with which we currently have challenges. They have this in two ways. There is the report writer, which is the backend, and we also have web reports, which are on the console. So, they have removed the report writer for the backend reports, and we are making use of the web console, but most of the users are not finding it very interesting to use the frontend reports. I would like them to bring back the report writer. That's the key area within it to improve on the reporting. If they can bring back the report writer, then most users will actually be comfortable. I have some customers who are trying to export their report to an Excel format, but it is not possible because they said any report that has been done from the web console cannot be exported to Excel, but most of the customers need to export their reports to Excel. That's one area they need to work on."

"This product has no real downside unless they fail to continue development of its capabilities."

"SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is not stable. We have to maintain the platform and it goes down frequently."

"Currently SolarWinds SAM offers AppInsight for modern versions of: IIS, Exchange, SQL Server. They have shown to be powerful and insightful tools. However, AppInsight needs to be offered for more applications: Citrix, SharePoint, AX, etc."

"SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor could improve the server monitoring and the web application monitoring features are not good. Microsoft SCOM has better server monitoring."

"Mapping interactions between systems."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor cons

"The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five minutes."

"SearchUI.exe is a bit clunky in the product, making it an area where the product needs improvements."

"Fine-grained data can be quite frustrating to work with and should be made easier."

"Implementing a more streamlined enrichment process, and conceptualizing the observability data collection as an ETL pipeline would be helpful."

"Documentation could be better. While it's generally good, sometimes finding what you need requires extensive searching. It's not always clear where to look for specific things."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing is on a yearly basis. It is just the standard price, but it can vary depending on the current rate of the dollar."

"The price is too high."

"The solution is overpriced in terms of application management."

"SAM is not per server so the pricing model can be deceiving. If you have an enterprise environment, you will quickly exceed your licensing quickly. You should know this before going in."

"I would advise potential buyers to wait until the end of the quarter, end of year, or other time to place orders. There are actually great deals to be had at those times if your budget cycle can match up."

"The licenses start from USD 3000.00 and go up to USD 20,000.00 for the year. It's a perpetual license. Nothing is free in SolarWinds, anything that you need is an additional cost."

"I would rate the pricing for this solution a three out of five."

"Pricing is inexpensive, starting at 2440 euros. For that, you get the ability to monitor a couple of nodes and one year of maintenance and support."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pricing and cost advice

"I started on the free tier to try it out, but because of our usage, we're now paying for it."

"Now, they’re not charging by ingests anymore. You should expect the price to be a bit of an unknown and to basically increase as the business increases."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

The initial cost is quite high, but the renewal cost is reasonable.

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

There is definitely room for improvement besides simplifying its setup. As a non-technical person, I believe the dashboards could be improved. Everything we use appears on video walls, and we need ...

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

I am doing research as we currently have both solutions, and I am looking to see if we need both or can manage with one. Currently, the outcome indicates that we need both. The focus point is diffe...

What needs improvement with Sumo Logic Observability?

The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five m...

What is your primary use case for Sumo Logic Observability?

We used it for log observability – log aggregation specifically.

What advice do you have for others considering Sumo Logic Observability?

I would advise to have a demo with them to understand the pricing. Sumo Logic Observability used to charge per data ingest, but now they charge by queries, making it difficult to estimate the cost ...

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Opsview vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Competitors

New Relic vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 5% of the time

Netumo vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Catchpoint vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

More Sumo Logic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor product report

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report

Sumo Logic Observability

Download Sumo Logic Observability product report

Also Known As

SolarWinds SAM

No data available

Overview

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides comprehensive server, application, and infrastructure monitoring, focusing on integration, application dependency, and network insights through user-friendly interfaces and detailed dashboards.

With AppStack and AppInsight support, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers service management, detailed resource dashboards, and integration capabilities. It monitors hardware metrics and performance parameters, facilitating database and network insights for cloud and virtual environments. Robust alerting, predictive analytics, and capacity planning ensure efficient management of server health and application performance.

What are the key features?

Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing tools.
AppStack: Provides a holistic view of applications.
AppInsight: Supports widely-used applications.
SNMP Polling: Efficient network data collection.
Diagnostics: Real-time troubleshooting.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored monitoring views.

What benefits should users expect?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Extends from servers to databases.
Transparent Control: Enhances visibility into performance metrics.
User-Friendly: Simplifies proactive monitoring with alerts.
Predictive Features: Supports capacity and trend planning.

Industries implement SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor to enhance server utilization reporting, network configuration, and AV equipment performance tracking. They benefit from monitoring critical services across diverse deployment models, improving management efficiency and decision-making.

SolarWinds

Sumo Logic Observability offers advanced monitoring solutions with features like integrated dashboards and querying capabilities, though presents a learning curve compared to alternatives. Designed for efficient log aggregation and analysis, it provides near-real-time updates facilitating improved incident resolution.

Sumo Logic Observability stands out with its ability to unify teams through a single platform, offering features that include customizable dashboards and valuable apps. It provides powerful log tracing and centralized management, designed for organizations focused on log aggregation, analysis, and expanding SIEM capabilities. While it has a steeper learning curve compared to some competitors, it excels in tailored integrations that enhance log searches. Users find themselves able to monitor, automate, and centralize log repositories for effective debugging. Despite its strengths, improvements in data enrichment and documentation organization are needed as current query functions can be slow, impacting efficiency. Users have also mentioned needing pre-built dashboards and better tab management for enhanced functionality. Cost management remains a notable consideration for users evaluating Sumo Logic Observability.

What features make Sumo Logic Observability effective?

Well-Crafted Dashboards: Customizable options for monitoring.
Flexible Query Language: Allows detailed log searches.
Centralized Management: Enables teams to work on one platform.
Near-Real-Time Updates: Enhances timely incident resolution.
Custom Field Creation: Facilitates user-specific data requirements.

How does Sumo Logic Observability benefit organizations?

Unified Platform: Brings teams together for streamlined operations.
Enhanced Integrations: Improves log search accuracy.
Tailored for SIEM: Supports security needs with efficient log management.
Efficient Data Monitoring: Automates processes for ease of management.
Scalability: Handles large data volumes efficiently.

Sumo Logic Observability is implemented across industries predominantly for managing and analyzing extensive data sets, offering capabilities critical for SIEM activities and security examinations. By facilitating quick data visualization and transaction tracking, organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from its robust framework to support infrastructure logging and large-scale data management, contributing to effective monitoring and system operations.

Sumo Logic

Sample Customers

Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite

Information Not Available

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Sumo Logic Observability