SolarWinds AppOptics vs Sumo Logic Observability comparison

SolarWinds and Sumo Logic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. SolarWinds is ranked #55, while Sumo Logic is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. SolarWinds holds a 0.7% mindshare in APM, compared to Sumo Logic’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sumo Logic users who would recommend it.

SolarWinds AppOptics

Read 9 SolarWinds AppOptics reviews

1,452 Views
886 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Sumo Logic Observability

Read 6 Sumo Logic Observability reviews

1,094 Views
777 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SolarWinds AppOptics

Sumo Logic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

SolarWinds AppOptics and Sumo Logic Observability are both prominent tools in the observability space. Users prefer the features of Sumo Logic Observability, but SolarWinds AppOptics offers better pricing and support, making it a viable choice for cost-conscious buyers.

Features: SolarWinds AppOptics users value its customizable dashboards, real-time metrics, and straightforward deployment. Sumo Logic Observability users value its powerful analytics, machine learning capabilities, and in-depth customer service.

Room for Improvement: Feedback for SolarWinds AppOptics suggests enhancements for integration capabilities, anomaly detection, and advanced alerting systems. For Sumo Logic Observability, users desire better alerting functions, improved onboarding processes, and enhanced user interface flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds AppOptics is praised for its straightforward deployment and helpful support team. Sumo Logic users find deployment more complex but appreciate the depth of its customer service despite initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds AppOptics users find the setup costs reasonable and value it for its return on investment. Sumo Logic is viewed as pricey but justified by its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Sumo Logic Observability Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Sumo Logic Observability

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SolarWinds AppOptics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

55th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

47th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (58th)

Sumo Logic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

24th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of SolarWinds AppOptics is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sumo Logic Observability is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sumo Logic Observability	0.5%
SolarWinds AppOptics	0.7%
Other	98.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

John Yuko

Assistant Manager ICT - Projects at I&M Bank Ltd

Unique features allow consolidating and combing metrics into a single dashboard, but don't monitor mobile solutions

I would like to see more granular information provided on Unix applications. Also, the integration with Unix services should be a bit more straightforward in terms having an agent to retrieve your credentials rather than having to enter or save them for SSH on SolarWinds. From the outset, we had to set some commands to log into the search console, and they are saved on the solution, which presents a challenge in terms of exposure. The solution is unable to monitor APK solutions completely because we'd then be forced to break down the APK and provide the APIs or go through the source code. They don't have a module that can analyze an application that is maybe under-used.

Read full review

Shamshir Nangla

Site Reliability Engineer at LHV Bank

Getting up and running is easy, even for a newbie but management of searches definitely needs improvement

Operational effectiveness with regards to when there's an issue, when there's a reactive issue, people are able to, or as well as proactively, actually, because we use their PagerDuty integrations. We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening. With those same alerts, obviously, with that platform, you can use it to reactively start looking at troubleshooting issues as they're happening right then and there or incidents. So it's been very, very good for alerting and for troubleshooting issues. For predicting issues before they happen, it is not very good. They have a feature called anomaly detection, but I think it's quite premature compared to other stuff out there. So it's good for alerts and for troubleshooting operational effectiveness. When your operations are down or segregated, it's perfect because it will help you diagnose the issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features of SolarWinds are the topology discovery and network performance analysis."

"The reporting of the solution is very good."

"The product has a great dashboard."

"The sum solution, NTA, and DPA."

"I have found the most valuable feature is application performance management."

"Technical support is always live and they're supportive."

"We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening."

"I have not seen any stability issues in the product."

"Alerting and consistency are key. We have different tiers with log collectors, and continuous querying provides near-real-time updates. It's almost like instantly when something happens, like pending transactions or error fees. This helps reduce incident resolution time compared to waiting for thresholds on other platforms. We can continue logging in with them seamlessly and quickly get into action."

"Sumo Logic Observability presents a range of valuable features, including well-crafted dashboards and a diverse selection of helpful apps. However, personally, I don't hold a favorable opinion of the solution. While I don't struggle with writing queries, my main difficulty lies in recruiting competent individuals and ensuring their proficiency in utilizing the solution. This often leads to additional challenges and complexities. From my perspective, when compared to Microsoft Sentinel or even Splunk, Sumo Logic Observability has a steeper learning curve. One contributing factor to this disparity is the solution's long existence in the market compared to Synlogic. Nevertheless, I acknowledge that there are capable and knowledgeable professionals employed at Sumo Logic Observability. The effectiveness of the solution largely depends on how it is integrated into your internal operations and environment. Its utility and benefits can vary significantly. It is worth noting that organizations like the NSA and, I believe, the CIA used it in the past, primarily for rapidly searching and analyzing large volumes of data. To leverage its capabilities effectively, you must determine how to tailor it to your specific needs."

"The product is easy to learn."

"The solution allows multiple groups to converge on a unified platform, allowing for different utilization by various teams."

Cons

"The implementation needs improvement. It needs to get modernized with the newer cloud scenario in both public and private deployment models."

"The solution should be more user-friendly."

"AppOptics would benefit from having a much more centralized view."

"The integration with Unix services should be a bit more straightforward."

"In terms of the technology, I think they need to put some more advanced troubleshooting into SolarWinds, in terms of AI capabilities. That's the next generation, especially in the cases of APIs which have already adopted AI capabilities into their products."

"I would like to see more integration with other tools that are available on the market."

"SearchUI.exe is a bit clunky in the product, making it an area where the product needs improvements."

"The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five minutes."

"Fine-grained data can be quite frustrating to work with and should be made easier."

"Implementing a more streamlined enrichment process, and conceptualizing the observability data collection as an ETL pipeline would be helpful."

"Documentation could be better. While it's generally good, sometimes finding what you need requires extensive searching. It's not always clear where to look for specific things."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the current licensing cost is reasonable."

"Mostly, it's a perpetual license. We don't have any customers using the subscription right now—it's mostly a perpetual license that the customers purchase. The licensing is based on the number of elements, whereas other solutions are node-based."

"Since it's a negotiable rate, I would rate the pricing as a five out of five."

"Now, they’re not charging by ingests anymore. You should expect the price to be a bit of an unknown and to basically increase as the business increases."

"I started on the free tier to try it out, but because of our usage, we're now paying for it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

11%

Transportation Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Sumo Logic Observability?

The product is easy to learn.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sumo Logic Observability?

The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sumo Logic Observability?

We used it for log observability – log aggregation specifically.

See all answers

Comparisons

New Relic vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 15% of the time

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs SolarWinds AppOptics

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds AppOptics Competitors

Dynatrace vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 16% of the time

Cribl vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

More Sumo Logic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download SolarWinds AppOptics product report

Buyer's Guide

Sumo Logic Observability

January 2026

Download Sumo Logic Observability product report

Also Known As

AppOptics, SolarWinds TraceView, Librato

No data available

Overview

AppOptics is a SaaS-based simple, powerful and affordable Infrastructure & Application monitoring for custom on-premises, cloud, and hybrid systems.

Your business runs on applications, and when they go down or run slowly, it can impact the business in lost productivity, customers, or revenue. To add to the complexity, your IT environment is changing, and workloads can be spread across data centers, and cloud resources. You need to monitor the availability and performance of applications and infrastructure, regardless of where they are, so you can identify potential issues early and address them before they impact users

SolarWinds

Sumo Logic Observability offers advanced monitoring solutions with features like integrated dashboards and querying capabilities, though presents a learning curve compared to alternatives. Designed for efficient log aggregation and analysis, it provides near-real-time updates facilitating improved incident resolution.

Sumo Logic Observability stands out with its ability to unify teams through a single platform, offering features that include customizable dashboards and valuable apps. It provides powerful log tracing and centralized management, designed for organizations focused on log aggregation, analysis, and expanding SIEM capabilities. While it has a steeper learning curve compared to some competitors, it excels in tailored integrations that enhance log searches. Users find themselves able to monitor, automate, and centralize log repositories for effective debugging. Despite its strengths, improvements in data enrichment and documentation organization are needed as current query functions can be slow, impacting efficiency. Users have also mentioned needing pre-built dashboards and better tab management for enhanced functionality. Cost management remains a notable consideration for users evaluating Sumo Logic Observability.

What features make Sumo Logic Observability effective?

Well-Crafted Dashboards: Customizable options for monitoring.
Flexible Query Language: Allows detailed log searches.
Centralized Management: Enables teams to work on one platform.
Near-Real-Time Updates: Enhances timely incident resolution.
Custom Field Creation: Facilitates user-specific data requirements.

How does Sumo Logic Observability benefit organizations?

Unified Platform: Brings teams together for streamlined operations.
Enhanced Integrations: Improves log search accuracy.
Tailored for SIEM: Supports security needs with efficient log management.
Efficient Data Monitoring: Automates processes for ease of management.
Scalability: Handles large data volumes efficiently.

Sumo Logic Observability is implemented across industries predominantly for managing and analyzing extensive data sets, offering capabilities critical for SIEM activities and security examinations. By facilitating quick data visualization and transaction tracking, organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from its robust framework to support infrastructure logging and large-scale data management, contributing to effective monitoring and system operations.

Sumo Logic

Sample Customers

TraxoCovea Insurance BTE TechnologyDatarista

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Sumo Logic Observability

January 2026

Free Report: SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Sumo Logic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Sumo Logic Observability and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Sumo Logic Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.