Snyk AppRisk [EOL] vs Veracode comparison

Read 201 Veracode reviews

14,926 Views
1,791 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Veracode and Snyk AppRisk [EOL] are competing in the application security space. Veracode has an edge in ease of deployment and support, while Snyk AppRisk [EOL] is favored for its extensive feature set and comprehensive security framework.

Features: Veracode offers robust static and dynamic analysis capabilities, providing detailed security insights. It integrates seamlessly with existing development workflows and caters to both small and large enterprises. Snyk AppRisk [EOL] specializes in open-source security, providing extensive vulnerability databases and actionable insights for risk mitigation, ideal for developers focused on open-source security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode provides straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring quick implementation with minimal maintenance. Snyk AppRisk [EOL] also offers cloud-based deployment, focusing on flexibility but may require initial configuration. Veracode's support ensures a smoother experience, beneficial for fast-paced teams.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode requires a higher initial investment, offering significant ROI through comprehensive security coverage and compliance support. Snyk AppRisk [EOL] may have a lower entry cost, considered cost-effective for managing open-source vulnerabilities. The return on investment for Snyk AppRisk [EOL] relates to cost savings in open-source security, while Veracode provides broader application security value.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

201

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Container Security (8th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (3rd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)

Featured Reviews

Use Snyk AppRisk [EOL]?

Share your opinion

Sajal Sharma

Test Analyst - Security at Net solutions India Pvt.

Offers shift-left security strategy and helps us with the latest security configurations, OWASP standards, and SAST standards

It's robustness is the main benefit to the organization. As it gets upgraded with time, it also improves the coverage – security configuration coverages and vulnerability coverages. It also updates itself with the latest known vulnerabilities that are uploaded to the NVD, OWASP, or other databases. So it gets upgraded itself with that. And so with each upgrade, it gets better and better. The solution offers the ability to prevent vulnerable code from going into production. It provides us with a report containing multiple remediations and mitigations for each vulnerability. For example, if it finds a cross-site scripting vulnerability, it will also include references like CWE and CVE records, instructions on how to fix it, and the specific line of code or module where the vulnerability is present. This helps us fix the issues accordingly. I'm a penetration tester and DevSecOps engineer. I evaluate the findings, mark false positives, and manually exploit vulnerabilities if they exist. If we need further clarification, we raise a ticket with the Veracode team and get consultancy from them. We are a software development team. If we find a vulnerability, I exploit it and come back with the best possible mitigation, and the dev team fixes it. If we use Veracode Fix, it might use third-party implementations or make changes we aren't aware of. We need to be very aware of what our application is using internally. It should be known to us. As per my experience, the solution's policy reporting ensures compliance with industry standards. It comes with multiple features. I get the most out of it, and it's good. The solution provides visibility into application status at every phase of development. Like static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition, and manual penetration tests - throughout the SDLC We have a pipeline that I maintain. I use the Veracode API account and have integrated it with AWS and our Jenkins pipeline. We use Snyk for SCA and Veracode for SAST scanning. At the earliest stage of the build, the SAST scan runs along with the JS and PHP files. It provides us with reports, which are then handed over to the other tools we depend on. If I validate the report or check the Veracode dashboard and find vulnerabilities, I mark them as false positives or existing issues. We work on multiple projects, but the one I'm handling these days only uses Veracode for SAST. It's been about one and a half years since I've been working with Veracode and this project. It is quite impressive. There are some things Veracode cannot find, like code obfuscations inside the code and some insecure randoms. Sometimes, it misses those flaws. But overall, if I compare it with other tools, it is better. I will definitely recommend others to use this tool. We run the scan before each deployment. If the dev team builds a new module or something, we scan it along with all the files. If we find anything, we get it fixed. That's how it works. Veracode is quite important to the organization's shift-left security strategy because we make a scan for each deployment. Sometimes, if I think we need to perform a shift-left, I just make a scan before deployment and check for any misconfiguration or vulnerability in the code.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

What do you like most about Veracode?

The SAST and DAST modules are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?

The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ox Security vs Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Cloud Observability vs Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Prometheus Group vs Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Wiz Code vs Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Snyk AppRisk [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

More Snyk AppRisk [EOL] Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Veracode

Compared 18% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

Download Snyk AppRisk [EOL] product report

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

Enso Security, Helios

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Snyk AppRisk [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to application security, aiding enterprises in identifying and managing software vulnerabilities efficiently for enhanced cybersecurity postures.

Designed for organizations aiming to fortify their application landscapes, Snyk AppRisk [EOL] integrates seamlessly into development workflows to automate vulnerability detection across dependencies. It provides insights to mitigate risks rapidly, aligning security with business objectives. This capability is essential for staying ahead of potential threats while maintaining agile software production.

What are the key features of Snyk AppRisk [EOL]?

Automated Vulnerability Detection: Continuously scans applications to identify potential weaknesses.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers detailed analysis for informed decision-making.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with development tools to streamline processes.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides immediate notifications for emerging vulnerabilities.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduced risk exposure through proactive measures.
Time Efficiency: Streamlined processes lead to quicker mitigation actions.
Cost Savings: Prevents costly breaches by addressing vulnerabilities early.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Snyk AppRisk [EOL] is implemented to safeguard sensitive information and ensure compliance with industry standards. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for diverse sectors requiring robust security assessments.

Snyk

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)