Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ServiceNow vs Unqork comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
ServiceNow enhances efficiency, reduces costs, and improves ROI with automation and streamlined processes, providing long-term organizational value.
Sentiment score
8.3
Unqork offers cost-effective, user-friendly solutions for efficient project management and development, enhancing ROI through optimized resources and performance.
The return on investment is good when implementing for ourselves and for other clients.
The platform provides default workspaces, and managing or increasing space is easier compared to other platforms.
Using Unqork has resulted in improved cost-saving, time-saving, and resource-saving benefits for our projects.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
ServiceNow's customer service is generally praised, but technical support experiences vary and rely on community resources.
Sentiment score
7.4
Unqork provides efficient tech support with quick responses, though some users note inconsistent quality in issue prioritization.
The support is exemplary and deserves a perfect rating.
I have contacted them four to five times over the past two years, and they have been quite helpful.
Most of the support comes from partners, and customers heavily rely on them.
The Unqork community helped integrate features like colored status indicators using JavaScript.
Technical support from Zendesk is very reliable and effective.
There were instances when support could not solve a problem and suggested raising it to higher management.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
ServiceNow is highly scalable, integrates well with systems, and offers flexibility, making it ideal for diverse organizations.
Sentiment score
7.1
Unqork effectively handles large data with MongoDB, but scalability and performance may vary based on configuration and specific conditions.
It is capable of vertical scaling with no issues.
Scalability features like UI and APIs are all available within the same platform, making it easy to handle increased demands.
Not every project can be executed through Unqork as some complex requirements might need proof of concept before proceeding.
Unqork consistently works in the background, releasing new components, and provides comprehensive documentation.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow is highly stable with minimal disruptions, often due to external factors, offering reliable SaaS performance and support.
Sentiment score
6.3
Unqork is generally stable with occasional issues, but users rate its stability highly despite minor disruptions and limitations.
ServiceNow is stable enough.
ServiceNow is already a stable tool.
A component's previously set value might be missing the next day, affecting reliability.
The main issue I have with Unqork is the limited availability of learning resources.
There have been no significant stability issues where the entire platform went down.
 

Room For Improvement

ServiceNow users seek improvements in interface, navigation, pricing, documentation, mobile functionality, support, updates, and third-party integrations.
Unqork requires accessibility, platform support, analytics, performance improvements, UI flexibility, mobile support, and enhanced data handling and migration tools.
There is a need for bug or error tracking in ServiceNow.
Their customer support could make it a great solution, not just product support but also their relationship with partners and training initiatives in different regions.
There are sometimes challenges with the portal being a bit confusing for new users.
Unqork moved from the Sanctuary to Vega platform without providing a migration tool, necessitating manual updates.
The setup for API calls was initially challenging, especially when dealing with service logs and transforming large JSON codes for validation and PDF generation.
It would be beneficial if they further improved compatibility with both the previous Sencha compiler and the new Vega compiler.
 

Setup Cost

ServiceNow's pricing is higher than competitors, suited for large enterprises but challenging for smaller companies due to cost complexity.
Enterprise users view Unqork's pricing as premium, yet valuable, with customized plans and costly certifications often employer-covered.
ServiceNow's pricing can be justified if more functionality is required.
ServiceNow is expensive for all regions.
The certification costs are particularly high, around 16,000 Indian Rupees.
The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath.
In my experience, it seemed somewhat underpriced, possibly due to being an early adopter.
 

Valuable Features

ServiceNow excels in customization, integration, and user-friendliness, offering versatile workflows, ITIL processes, and strong community support.
Unqork excels with its enterprise integrations, AI, user-friendly design, scalability, security, API, and collaboration tools for efficient operations.
ServiceNow provides a wide range of functionality, covering all the necessary modules, unlike Jira which is primarily for IT.
Automation capabilities are impressive, bolstered by a vast repository of out-of-the-box connectors and plugins that facilitate integration with various applications worldwide.
The most valuable features of ServiceNow for me are its ticketing and reporting capabilities.
It streamlines operations by automating the process across various departments, allowing cash requests to be raised, reviewed, and approved more efficiently.
Performance-wise, Unqork facilitates connecting and configuring systems synchronously and efficiently.
Unqork allows me to write HTML code, use JavaScript, Angular, and React, which significantly enhances its flexibility.
 

Categories and Ranking

ServiceNow
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
217
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (1st), IT Asset Management (1st), IT Service Management (ITSM) (1st), No-Code Development Platforms (1st)
Unqork
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
17th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of ServiceNow is 10.9%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Unqork is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Somnath Kand - PeerSpot reviewer
Custom integration and reporting lead to efficient ticket management
There is a need for bug or error tracking in ServiceNow. Although there are child incidents or tickets, tracking primary issues or bugs within enhancements is not present. The reporting features in the new portal could be more user-friendly. While it provides options to minimize chart and image sizes, actual implementation doesn't always reflect these changes.
Rajeev Lochan - PeerSpot reviewer
Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support
Given the rapid pace of innovation we’ve already seen from Unqork, there are a few major capability gaps we face currently. However, some areas of improvement and features we would benefit from in upcoming releases include: 1. Enhanced accessibility compliance - While meeting baseline standards, further WCAG conformance and widgets optimized for screen readers could expand access for disabled users of Unqork solutions. Added compliance certifications would also be welcomed. 2. Expanded cloud platform support - The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon. 3. More analytics and observability - Increased telemetry on app performance, component reuse rates, load testing etc. would help fine-tune Unqork solutions. More data and dashboard visibility into adoption would optimize our ROI. 4. Managing technical debt - As portfolios of Unqork apps grow over time, best practices and features to facilitate updating legacy components, refactoring old solutions, and preventing erosion will be helpful. Added controls to manage technical debt long-term. 5. Evolution of existing components - Existing rich widgets and connectors rounding out maturity with incremental capabilities would expand Unqork's versatility. Expanding the range of use cases served by current components. 6. Offline functionality - For mobile solutions, some limited persistent caching and offline usability during intermittent connectivity would better support field agents/inspectors. Tolerating offline states is key. 7. Design version control - Advancing visual version control capabilities for better design history, branching, merging, and reverting changes to Unqork sites would improve collaboration and prevent overwrite errors by nontechnical users.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
39%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
What do you like most about ServiceNow?
The solution has a user-friendly interface.
What do you like most about Unqork?
Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors.
What needs improvement with Unqork?
Unqork needs to improve its learning resources because there aren't many available on platforms like YouTube or Google. Furthermore, troubleshooting is an area for improvement as errors should be v...
What is your primary use case for Unqork?
I use Unqork ( /products/unqork-reviews ) as a no-code platform to create various types of websites based on user requirements. For example, I can use it for developing solutions for insurance, ban...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AAA, AstraZeneca, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Broadcom, Christus Health, Epicor, Equinix, GE Capital, Intuit, KPMG, Loyola Marymount University, OshKosh, Quantas, RedHat, Royal Bank of Scotland, Swiss Re, U.S. Department of Energy, Safeway, Yale University, and Zillow    
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow vs. Unqork and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.