We performed a comparison between ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is quite convenient and user-friendly."
"The solution is scalable."
"Competitive in terms of research"
"The most valuable features of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management are the multiple methodology possibilities for projects. It has hybrid, traditional, and Agile capabilities. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other platforms, such as Microsoft Azure."
"The program is stable."
"We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network engineering teams. When there's an issue at the product or network level, we raise a ticket, and our team works together to resolve it."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very intuitive to set up."
"The performance is good."
"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."
"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."
"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."
"The timing reporting module, and how it's used is a bit difficult to understand. Everything related to project management is quite extensive. It needs to be simplified. At first, our users didn't want to use it, because it seems a bit complex."
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"The interface is cluttered with a lot of names and areas. It may not be user friendly enough for a first timer."
"The portfolio managed is good for IT, but it's not good for non it's not necessarily great for construction projects, such as the building of physical infrastructure."
"The product comes with little options out of the box."
"When we import a really big project with a lot of tasks on it, we face some issues with dependencies. The links between tasks are not working very well. There is definitely room for improvement there. Microsoft Project, in my opinion, is the best option for such a use case."
"A major improvement we would like to see is definitely around agile management."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."
"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."
"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and Smartsheet, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs. Teamwork report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.