Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Sectona Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager comparison

Sectona and Broadcom are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Sectona is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Sectona holds a 0.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sectona users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Sectona Privileged Access M...
Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews
  • 391 Views
  • 172 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Symantec Privileged Access ...
Read 53 Symantec Privileged Access Manager reviews
  • 673 Views
  • 326 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Symantec Privileged Access Manager and Sectona Privileged Access Management are key players in the privileged access solutions market. Sectona seems to have an upper hand due to its integration capabilities and customization, despite Symantec's strong security protocols.

Features: Symantec Privileged Access Manager offers advanced security protocols, expandability, and reliable access controls. Sectona Privileged Access Management provides seamless integration with IT infrastructure, intuitive control processes, and flexible user access policies.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users see a need for better reporting and analytics, a more user-friendly interface, and easier updates. Sectona users desire improved scalability, more comprehensive training resources, and enhanced backup options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec has a detailed deployment process that is complex but benefits from robust and responsive customer support. Sectona's deployment is faster and simpler, though its customer service could be more proactive.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec has a higher initial setup cost but provides significant ROI with its comprehensive security. Sectona offers a more cost-effective upfront investment, with some users noting that faster integration reduces operational costs over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sectona Privileged Access M...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Privileged Access ...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
18th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Privileged Access Manager is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Pankaj-Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability
There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.
Read full review
Muzi Lubisi - PeerSpot reviewer
Secure management of sensitive servers and seamless applications with direct linking
The credential injection feature is highly valued, particularly for RDP sessions. A majority of customers use it for RDP, and a couple for Linux servers. The broader capabilities, including access to multiple systems, web-based applications, and clustering, have never posed an issue. The threat analytics aspect is also a robust feature that analyzes all pertinent information.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."
"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."
"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."
"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."
"We know we can scale up with what we have, and we probably will not need to buy any further appliances down the road."
"The DB clustering is a really good benefit of using CA PAM."
"You can do A2A integration. You can have your own script, which can then run outside of PA to retrieve the password and perform other tasks."
"CA PAM is working well for us."
"The credential injection feature is highly valued, particularly for RDP sessions."
"Whoever built it from the ground up, they understand how an organization is laid out."
"It will provide us with more security."
"The RDP-gateway: For limiting which server an operator can access."
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pros
 

Cons

"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."
"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."
"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."
"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."
"We experience stability issues after every patch upgrade. This is a place where CA needs to improve drastically."
"The management console could be improved."
"What I hope happens with the new product CA PAM is to keep all the useful features that exist in PA, but what I’ve noticed with many new products is the UI gets polished but systems lags stability and performance or it adds additional complexity instead of simplifying the user experience."
"We have to do a lot of manual work to automate features."
"I would like this solution to be simpler. It should have a one-click access that works together with AWS."
"They need to have zero tier and active-active setup ​with zero minimum downtime, which they are working on it. ​"
"I’m no fan of Java as an application front-end, as it tends to have issues depending on what browser one’s using."
"I wish it could create local accounts on desktops."
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."
"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."
"I would prefer better licensing options for the 20-100 users we have at a given time."
"Pricing is fair compared to other top vendors."
"Don’t go with an agent model. Don’t go with a model that has you buying a thousand different parts. Go with PAM that gives you everything, or you’ll just be paying costs of implementing another tool that PAM would have just given you up front."
"They offer per-device, per-user, or monthly and yearly licensing models."
"It is reasonably priced."
"The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution."
"Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market. ​"
"It is more expensive than other solutions on the market."
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sectona Privileged Access Management?
The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectona Privileged Access Management?
Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Sectona Privileged Access Management?
Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access M...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec Privileged Access Manager?
We can check the activities in the server for fragile files and documents in case of any issues.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?
Due to the nature of the solution, it is hard to gauge, but compared to competitors, the pricing is very good. I would rate it as an eight and a half out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Symantec Privileged Access Manager?
Recent releases need improvement in webpage management. For instance, navigating through a webpage that acts like a wizard, where I proceed to the next page and enter more information, is not handl...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management
Compared 55% of the time
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management Logo
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management
Compared 27% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management
Compared 18% of the time
More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Compared 29% of the time
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Compared 28% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Compared 17% of the time
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager Logo
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Delinea Secret Server vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Compared 12% of the time
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Sectona Privileged Access Management
May 2025
Sectona Privileged Access Management reportDownload Sectona Privileged Access Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Privileged Access Manager
May 2025
Symantec Privileged Access Manager reportDownload Symantec Privileged Access Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager
 

Overview

Sectona is a Privileged Access Management company that helps enterprises mitigate risk of targeted attacks to privileged accounts spread across data centers and cloud. Sectona delivers integrated privilege management components for securing dynamic remote workforce access across on-premises or cloud workloads, endpoints and machine to machine communication.

Sectona with its light, integrated approach provides a single console for securing passwords & secrets in embedded vault, secure access with cross-platform access technology & manage privileges over endpoints.

Sectona

CA Privileged Access Manager is a simple-to-deploy, automated, proven solution for privileged access management in physical, virtual and cloud environments. It enhances security by protecting sensitive administrative credentials such as root and administrator passwords, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing policies and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across all IT resources.  It includes CA PAM Server Control (previously CA Privileged Identity Manager) for fine-grained protection of critical servers

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft
Buyer's Guide
Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager
June 2025
Free Report: Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.