BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager comparison

BeyondTrust and Broadcom are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. BeyondTrust is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. BeyondTrust holds a 3.1% mindshare in PAM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BeyondTrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Read 32 BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management reviews

5,929 Views
2,727 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Read 53 Symantec Privileged Access Manager reviews

3,322 Views
2,724 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and Symantec Privileged Access Manager both compete in the domain of Privileged Access Management solutions. BeyondTrust is noted for excellent pricing and support, while Symantec is seen as offering superior features that justify its higher cost.

Features: BeyondTrust is distinguished by its capabilities in asset discovery, privilege management, and seamless integration, which are key for securing environments. Its adaptability, especially in cloud deployments, is a standout. In contrast, Symantec provides a comprehensive package with extensive session management and credential management, making it a strong choice for IT administrators seeking cost-effective solutions with robust features.

Room for Improvement: BeyondTrust could enhance its update frequency and simplify access through its interface, with users seeking stronger Mac integration and reporting capabilities. Symantec requires improvements in multi-tenancy capabilities, session recording features, and should incorporate session management by default without extra licensing. More regular feature updates would also benefit Symantec to meet market expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BeyondTrust supports varied deployment options, including public cloud, but some experience challenges during setup. Symantec, primarily focused on on-premises solutions, is preferred for ease of deployment and use. For customer service, BeyondTrust offers reliable support but with occasional inconsistencies, while Symantec users generally report efficient assistance during transitions.

Pricing and ROI: BeyondTrust is considered expensive but delivers features that justify its cost, with flexible licensing enhancing its market attractiveness. Symantec is viewed as more cost-effective, especially for long-term use. BeyondTrust's ROI is enhanced by compliance and cost-saving capabilities, making it an efficient solution, whereas Symantec's competitive pricing and potential for cost savings reinforce its market strength.

To learn more, read our detailed BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,350 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (22nd)

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is 3.1%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Privileged Access Manager is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management	3.1%
Symantec Privileged Access Manager	1.8%
Other	95.1%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

NasirAkbar

Presales Engineer at SAUDI PARAMOUNT COMPUTER SYSTEMS

Improved security measures with some support response delays

For BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, the best features are the security measures we have, such as not sharing any credentials with employees in the bank sector. For security purposes in BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, when employees are working in the system, we can make a recording of the video, showing the modifications and configurations they made, allowing us to see everything. The recording option is available. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management positively impacts the organization by providing more security and benefits, such as ensuring that if modifications are made, we can see where mistakes occurred in the recording video. The recording video in BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management allows us to see modifications and mistakes, which is an advantage.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Secure management of sensitive servers and seamless applications with direct linking

The credential injection feature is highly valued, particularly for RDP sessions. A majority of customers use it for RDP, and a couple for Linux servers. The broader capabilities, including access to multiple systems, web-based applications, and clustering, have never posed an issue. The threat analytics aspect is also a robust feature that analyzes all pertinent information.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The privileged access and the application control are helpful in making sure we have good, robust challenge responses. Blacklisting with trusted application protection is also beneficial for us."

"It has some features that other products don't have yet, differentiation that sets it apart in the marketplace... Those features are a centralized dashboard and the ability to issue and revoke entitlements within minutes. That makes a difference."

"The solution can do so much; it's quite flexible, a great tool, and it's nice to have administration tools without having to remember the password because you just have to click on whatever you need to do and you get temporary access."

"Technical support is good."

"It reduces major vulnerabilities by removing local administrator privileges."

"The product is secure."

"It has reduced the unwanted risk and increased the security posture."

"Administrators need a tool that provides visibility and clarity about endpoint management within the organization. This addresses the issue of managing privileged users, which is crucial for any administrator or higher management team to control."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management pros

"Monitoring privileged users’ actions is valuable because of the high level of trust and wide-ranging access insiders typically enjoy."

"Some of the valuable features are safe access to company resources, quick, comprehensible, and intuitive management interface, and good integration capabilities."

"It gives you list of servers, so you can see which users have access to which servers. This is really useful, so we can make sure nobody is getting extra access than what is needed."

"Whoever built it from the ground up, they understand how an organization is laid out."

"If I remember correctly, it was the two factor authentication, and the single most important capability was it supported PIV and CAC as one of the two factors."

"For me, it is the robust API which is the most valuable feature. This allows for low maintenance costs and allows applications to automatically connect. This is great to automate security of the DevOps pipeline for shared secrets across environments. Also, being on Linux and a virtual appliance is great."

"I like the fact that passwords are checked-in automatically."

"Comprehensive coverage of the required features for the PAM solution."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pros

Cons

"The program updates are very rare and the frequency is too far apart to take care of bug fixes and adding the latest features."

"It only has limited support for Mac."

"If you don't get the implementation right at the outset, you will struggle with the product."

"There are been cases that we are handling that have been going on for a year now. Even though they are an industry leader, they haven't been able to solve a small problem."

"Reports to the end user."

"It keeps on breaking every now and then. It is not yet mature."

"There is room for improvement in having the solution align more with standards. We're always shoehorning the product into the standards. It's not that it doesn't work for standards, it does. But Quick Start Policies are pretty close to what we need. The vendor needs to keep looking at GDPR, 27001, and 27701. That's why our clients buy the product."

"One issue, especially when you deploy HA actively and passively, is the synchronization."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management cons

"The rule management portion and reporting is very weak on its own."

"The product has not improved our organization."

"Be prepared to call tech support a lot because the documentation is almost worthless."

"We have to do a lot of manual work to automate features."

"I wish it could create local accounts on desktops."

"Now, the reporting feature on CA PAM only shows the basic information in white-black table format."

"There were some issues with stability. From what I remember, people would complain that every 30 minutes to an hour or so, their connection would drop and they'd have to reconnect, but it wasn't clear whether that was a problem with the network we were working on or whether that was a problem with Privileged Access Manager."

"The service account management functionality needs to be extended to application pools, SQL database, PowerShell scripts, service account discovery, etc."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is high."

"It is relatively more cost-effective compared to the competing product."

"This solution is expensive compared to its competitors."

"PowerBroker for a Mac client is three times the price of the Windows version."

"What BeyondTrust was providing was user-based licensing which was a great benefit from the client point of view. Recently, I don't know why, the licensing model has been changed, and that is the reason that they have lost a bit of their edge when it comes to the PAM, against our competition. The asset-based licensing, from the user's point of view, is not beneficial. The licensing should be based on the users. The greater the number of users, the greater will be the load and the greater the scalability problems. I presume that is why the licensing model has changed."

"It was very expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Its pricing and licensing are okay. We were in the perpetual model when it was on-prem, and now, with the SaaS service, we have a subscription model. As a customer, I would always like to see a lower price, but it seems to be priced at the right model currently, and we are trying to get the maximum benefits out of it."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management pricing and cost advice

"The version we are using is affordable compared to BeyondTrust, which is maybe three to four times as expensive, but it depends on the features."

"It is more expensive than other solutions on the market."

"Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market. "

"The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution."

"Don’t go with an agent model. Don’t go with a model that has you buying a thousand different parts. Go with PAM that gives you everything, or you’ll just be paying costs of implementing another tool that PAM would have just given you up front."

"It is reasonably priced."

"The licensing is simple and scalable."

"Appliances are relatively cheap, don’t skimp. Make sure you have redundancy, high availability, and enough appliances to manage the concurrent workload."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

BeyondTrust's pricing is premium but negotiable for Bangladesh. Expect 20-30% extra costs from currency/import factors. Start with modular licensing (EPM first), demand emerging market discounts, a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

In future updates of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, I would prefer to see features for Password Safe and VPN access, as we have applications for that. Technical support for BeyondTrust ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

Due to the nature of the solution, it is hard to gauge, but compared to competitors, the pricing is very good. I would rate it as an eight and a half out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

Recent releases need improvement in webpage management. For instance, navigating through a webpage that acts like a wizard, where I proceed to the next page and enter more information, is not handl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

With the customers that I have so far, I help them broker RDP sessions to sensitive servers, particularly those that manage aspects like physical access. I have also done it for backend databases, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 9% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 7% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 5% of the time

Omada Identity vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 5% of the time

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 26% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Safeguard by One Identity vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

August 2026

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management report

Download BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Privileged Access Manager

July 2026

Symantec Privileged Access Manager report

Download Symantec Privileged Access Manager product report

Also Known As

BeyondTrust PowerBroker, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Windows, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Mac, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Linux, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Unix, Avecto Defendpoint

CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager

Overview

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management offers enhanced security through asset discovery and privilege elevation without administrative rights, supporting seamless operations in complex environments.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management combines advanced threat detection with powerful tools like application control and session management. It is designed to secure IT infrastructures by removing local admin privileges and facilitating remote application publishing. With integration capabilities and robust compliance support, it is suitable for sectors needing stringent security measures. However, improvements in update frequency, Mac integration, and pricing, along with enhanced reporting and console access, are needed to broaden market reach. Organizations value its scalability and flexibility, despite needing better support and development maturity.

What Features Define BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

Asset Discovery: Identifies and catalogs IT assets for comprehensive visibility.
Privilege Management: Manages user privileges to minimize risks.
Session Management: Monitors and controls sessions for secure access.
Password Management: Secures credentials to prevent unauthorized access.
Application Control: Enables whitelisting and blacklisting for security.
Analytics: Offers insights into security trends and threats.

What Benefits Should Organizations Expect from Using BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

Enhanced Security: Reduces vulnerabilities by managing permissions effectively.
Scalable Deployment: Adapts to growing organizational requirements.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting regulatory standards.
Improved Integration: Facilitates connections with other platforms like Active Directory.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is widely adopted in the finance and healthcare industries for privileged access management and compliance. It is instrumental in secure server access and remote management, aligning with zero-trust approaches and integrating smoothly with enterprise platforms.

BeyondTrust

Symantec Privileged Access Manager provides enterprises with advanced capabilities in managing access and security compliance, emphasizing seamless integration and scalability. Organizations leverage it for simplified access control and proactive security management to enhance data privacy.

It's designed for managing privileged access across diverse IT environments, featuring easy deployment and configuration along with robust integration capabilities. Users benefit from its scalable architecture, transparent login procedures, and comprehensive password management. Despite its strengths, some challenges persist with the interface, policy management, and upgrade processes. Session recording limitations and documentation gaps are noted, impacting overall user satisfaction. Integration with specific systems, especially mainframes, and a restrictive pricing model present challenges. Nonetheless, its role in managing admin access and reducing security threats in Linux and Windows environments remains critical. Enhanced security is further achieved through integration with CA strong authentication.

What features does Symantec Privileged Access Manager offer?

Easy Deployment and Configuration: Quick setup process with intuitive functionality.
Password Management: Automated rotation of random, strong passwords.
Integration with Active Directory: Direct and seamless connectivity for user management.
Session Recording: Comprehensive logging of user activity for audit purposes.
Credential Injection: Secured access without revealing passwords to users.

What benefits should organizations look for?

Scalability: Supports growth and complex enterprise environments.
Security Compliance: Enhances data protection and regulatory adherence.
Transparency: Simplified login and access management for users.
Cost Efficiency: Potential reduction in security incidents and associated costs.

Organizations in the financial sector appreciate its effective management of privileged accounts across IT infrastructures, including servers and applications. It's valued for its role in RDP and SSH session facilitation and focus on enterprise-level security, crucial for identity governance and protecting high-stakes data.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Aera Energy LLC, Care New England, James Madison University

NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

August 2026

Free Report: BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.