Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Seconize DeRisk Center vs Zafran Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Seconize DeRisk Center
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (43rd)
Zafran Security
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (27th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Seconize DeRisk Center is designed for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 0.0%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
Zafran Security, on the other hand, focuses on Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM), holds 11.2% mindshare.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Seconize DeRisk Center?
Share your opinion
Israel Cavazos Landini - PeerSpot reviewer
Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions
I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?
I find that the pricing for Zafran aligns well with the comprehensive features it offers. The asset and user-based licensing model is particularly advantageous as it allows for scalability in line ...
What needs improvement with Zafran Security?
Zafran is a new startup. Features are continuously being added or improved. 1) Continued integrations with existing (less popular) security tools. Not everyone is using the Gartner Magic Quadrant u...
What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?
We connect this to our vulnerability scanner as input, our security tools to better determine risk, and our change management tool to provide risk-based vulnerabilities to the remediation teams. We...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. ABN AMRO 2. AIG 3. Allianz 4. American Express 5. Bank of America 6. Barclays 7. BNP Paribas 8. Capital One 9. Citigroup 10. Credit Suisse 11. Deutsche Bank 12. Discover Financial Services 13. HSBC 14. ING 15. JPMorgan Chase 16. Lloyds Banking Group 17. Mizuho Financial Group 18. Morgan Stanley 19. NatWest Group 20. Nordea 21. PNC Financial Services Group 22. Santander Group 23. Scotiabank 24. State Street Corporation 25. UBS 26. Wells Fargo 27. Westpac Banking Corporation 28. Worldpay
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.