We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."
"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"The product is very stable."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"How simple it is to create new solutions."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."
"The cloud capability features need improvement."
"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."
"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, IBM B2B Integrator and TIBCO BusinessWorks, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Integration Cloud Service. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
