Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"The tool's AI feature is helpful in endpoint security."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"The user-friendliness of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is particularly impressive. Even with basic technical knowledge, users can easily navigate the system, make changes, and implement updates."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."

"Technical support is excellent."

"The product can be installed in almost any environment"

"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."

"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."

"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."

"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."

"We would like to solution to offer better security."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"We'd like better UI on the management screen."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"The product pricing is high."

"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Comparisons

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 7% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 7% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)