Red Canary vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Red Canary and Tenable are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Red Canary is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Additionally, 100% of Red Canary users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Tenable Security Center and Red Canary compete in the cybersecurity space. Red Canary appears to lead in customer service and feature-rich offerings, while Tenable Security Center offers robust pricing and deployment solutions that provide value.

Features: Tenable Security Center stands out in vulnerability management, asset discovery, and network security visibility. It offers extensive dashboards and reporting capabilities that simplify security management across large organizations. Additionally, its vulnerability priority rating and the flexibility to create bespoke scanning policies are valuable features. Red Canary excels in advanced threat detection, endpoint security, and behavior analytics. It offers exceptional threat intelligence and automation, which can significantly enhance security operations.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve with better customization in its scanning policies, enhanced integration capabilities, and reduced false positives in its vulnerability reporting. It might also benefit from an easier interface for new users and enhanced customer support responsiveness. Red Canary may improve by offering more competitive pricing, expanding its threat detection capabilities, and providing more comprehensive deployment guidance. Additionally, enhancing customization options for specific enterprise needs could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center offers solid on-premise deployment support with comprehensive guidance, ensuring successful implementation. Its customer service is generally responsive but could improve in certain areas. Red Canary, on the other hand, offers an efficient cloud-based deployment model, which enables quick and easy setup. Its customer service is noted for its exceptional responsiveness and support, making management simpler and more effective.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is recognized for competitive pricing models that offer strong ROI through effective security assurance and resource management. Customers find the cost reasonable given the comprehensive protections offered. Red Canary's pricing may be higher, but customers find significant ROI through advanced threat detection and strategic threat mitigation capabilities, justifying the initial investment with long-term security gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Canary vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Tenable Security Center

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Sagar Shekhar

Cyber Security Analyst at TIAA

An open-source tool that offers great automation capabilities

Red Canary MDR generates a lot of output, so it would be good if, in the end, it generates a summary of all the previous attacks and what was the outcome of a single attack, especially so that it becomes easy for the user to see the summary and analyze the whole thing. In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users.

Read full review

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"I recommended Red Canary to my friends who work in other organizations."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part."

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are the reports and the dashboards."

"Tenable Security Center scans networks and gives reports."

"Tenable SC is good for reporting and alerting. The filtering feature is also very valuable. Its integration with multiple vendors is quite good. It can be integrated with SIEM solutions and PAM solutions such as Thycotic, which is very helpful."

"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."

"The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs."

"Support is knowledgeable."

"Tenable also helps us to focus resources on the vulnerabilities that are most likely to be exploited. And since it is continuously updated, it allows us to reevaluate quickly if there are new vulnerabilities found..."

"It allows financial institutions to compare their vulnerability management to others in the same sector."

More Tenable Security Center pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

"Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions."

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

"The price could always be better."

"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."

"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."

"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."

"The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."

"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."

"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."

More Tenable Security Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

"I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing."

"Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."

"The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."

"It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."

"Compared to other companies or other products it could maybe be a little bit less, but the price is okay. I would say it's not very expensive."

"We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."

"My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs. The pricing of the solution falls in the mid-range level, so it is not too expensive"

"The price of Tenable SC is expensive, we pay approximately €70,000 for the license annually. We have to pay for each IP test. The cost of other solutions is far less, such as Nessus Professional, which is €3,000 annually."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt reme...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Canary MDR?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

The services are higher priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions.

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into Europea...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 41% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 9% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 15% of the time

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 11% of the time

Rapid7 MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 9% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

June 2025

Download Red Canary product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

June 2025

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Tenable Security Center

June 2025

Free Report: Red Canary vs. Tenable Security Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Canary vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Canary vs. Tenable Security Center report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.