Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Reblaze vs Sucuri comparison

Link11 and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Link11 is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.5, while Sucuri Security is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Link11 holds a 0.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Link11 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.
Reblaze
Read 10 Reblaze reviews
  • 444 Views
  • 212 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Sucuri
Read 6 Sucuri reviews
  • 683 Views
  • 269 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2025

Sucuri and Reblaze compete in the cybersecurity space. While Sucuri stands out for its pricing and customer support, Reblaze is seen as superior due to its extensive features and overall value, suggesting it may be worth a higher cost for its comprehensive functionality.

Features: Sucuri offers essential website protection features such as firewall protection, malware detection, and DDoS mitigation. Reblaze provides advanced security with features like bot mitigation, API security, and superior traffic analytics for enhanced protection and control.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could benefit from adding more advanced analytics and real-time monitoring capabilities. Expanding its support for larger businesses might improve its offering. Enhancing integration flexibility with more third-party platforms could make it more adaptable. Reblaze could improve by simplifying their deployment process to reduce the learning curve. Offering a more user-friendly interface could enhance usability. Lowering initial setup costs may make it more accessible to smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sucuri offers a cloud-based solution that allows for straightforward integration and quick operation post-integration. Their responsive support ensures smooth deployment. Reblaze, despite its complex infrastructure, provides comprehensive documentation and robust service to assist with its more involved setup requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri provides a cost-effective option suitable for small to mid-sized businesses, offering solid ROI through its subscription model. In contrast, Reblaze involves higher initial costs but delivers significant long-term ROI thanks to its advanced security measures, appealing to larger organizations requiring extensive protection.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Reblaze vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Reblaze vs. Sucuri
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Reblaze
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
22nd
Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Bot Management (9th)
Sucuri
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
24th
Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
15th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Domain Name System (DNS) Security (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Reblaze is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

SS
Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks
There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town. AWS WAF, the Web Application Firewall from AWS, has a vast database of bad IP addresses due to its long-standing presence in this business. Reblaze, being a new entrant, is still building its database of bad IP addresses and malicious systems. So, Reblaze needs to work on that aspect. But other than that, I don't think scaling Reblaze has been an issue. There were some initial glitches, but they were all sorted out. So currently, I would say that the bot management and the database are areas they should focus on for further improvement.
Read full review
Akshit Malik - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides website security, safeguarding against various threats and effective protection against DDoS attacks
The initial setup is moderate because it's neither too easy nor too hard. Sucuri provides us with many ways to set up our site, handle the routing, and perform the necessary configurations. It's deployed on the cloud. We used the managed service of Sucuri and then routed all the requests from Sucuri to our AWS platform.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best thing about Reblaze, for us, is that it has been a game changer because previously, we were using Google's Web Application Firewall, but it wasn't up to the mark."
"The most valuable features were the real-time monitoring and the management. With this kind of product, you need a very good management system to allow you to see false positives in real-time; to see what's happening in real-time... The clarity stood out. It was very visible and very easy to navigate; very easy to find the data we were looking for."
"Provides mobile app security."
"We like the website protection. It's really good. The dashboard is really simple to use."
"The real-time monitoring and reporting are very good. There are information updates in their portal every two minutes. They also have the ability to spill it into Sumo Logic, for example. It's very easy to use."
"Reblaze knows how to manage security. For me as, someone who knows little about security, it's good that I have a firm that optimizes everything according to their standards. It's their responsibility and they are fully hands-on."
"It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease."
"The feature I find most valuable is the user-friendly dashboard. It is easy to understand how everything works and it allows you to make decisions quickly and efficiently."
More Reblaze pros
"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."
"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."
"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."
"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."
 

Cons

"I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis."
"The WAF features are not as granular as we would expect from a WAF system. There should be more granularity and in-depth rules, out-of-the-box."
"We have multiple products behind different instances of Reblaze. We have one instance for staging and then we have a production instance for multiple products. One of the things that we have requested is a unified view panel, so that we can see each of the instances in a unified view. That way, we won't have to go bouncing from instance to instance."
"The next release should have next-generation automation."
"Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have. But besides that, up until now, I am really pleased with their service and I've also recommended them to some of my clients."
"They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."
"There is room for improvement in helping us understanding session management... We want Reblaze to catch and identify everything. We want to see the various devices doing one activity and to see, in a timeline, what's happened. We would like to see a more human-readable display to understand what's happening in the web app."
"It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level requirements."
More Reblaze cons
"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."
"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."
"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."
"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."
"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."
"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."
"I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."
"On a monthly basis we pay $750."
"There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."
"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."
"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."
"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."
"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Media Company
7%
Educational Organization
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Reblaze?
It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Reblaze?
We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration. It is worth mentioning that these figures might not be current....
See all answers
What needs improvement with Reblaze?
There is a potential improvement regarding simplifying the complexity of rule creation. It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level re...
See all answers
What do you like most about Sucuri?
The initial setup was very easy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?
The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Sucuri?
The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

AWS WAF vs Reblaze Logo
AWS WAF vs Reblaze
Compared 28% of the time
Cloudflare vs Reblaze Logo
Cloudflare vs Reblaze
Compared 25% of the time
Akamai App and API Protector vs Reblaze Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs Reblaze
Compared 18% of the time
Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze
Compared 15% of the time
F5 Advanced WAF vs Reblaze Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Reblaze
Compared 14% of the time
More Reblaze Competitors
Cloudflare vs Sucuri Logo
Cloudflare vs Sucuri
Compared 47% of the time
SiteLock vs Sucuri Logo
SiteLock vs Sucuri
Compared 19% of the time
AWS WAF vs Sucuri Logo
AWS WAF vs Sucuri
Compared 15% of the time
Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri Logo
Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri
Compared 11% of the time
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Sucuri Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Sucuri
Compared 8% of the time
More Sucuri Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Reblaze
June 2025
Reblaze reportDownload Reblaze product report
Buyer's Guide
Sucuri
May 2025
Sucuri reportDownload Sucuri product report
 

Overview

Reblaze provides real-time monitoring, reporting, and botnet protections, enhancing security management with agile customization. Its intuitive dashboard supports efficient decision-making, while flexible rules and geo-blocking ensure security across geographies.

Reblaze is primarily deployed for web application firewall (WAF), DDoS prevention, and bot management, effectively defending against Layer 7 DDoS, phishing, SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and unwanted IP traffic. Supporting both public and private cloud deployments, including Amazon-hosted applications, Reblaze filters malicious activities to safeguard internet businesses. Users appreciate its comprehensive security approach, particularly for mobile app protection through its API and advanced filtering against script injections. Room for improvement includes change management, automation, reporting alerts, session management, and more granular WAF features. Adjustments in pricing and enhancements for bot management and bad IP address databases are sought after.

What are Reblaze's Most Important Features?
  • Intuitive Dashboard: Facilitates efficient decision-making with customizable settings.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Provides active tracking and instant security insights.
  • WAF with Traffic Analysis: Allows detailed inspection of all incoming traffic.
  • Swift DDoS Defense: Rapid response against distributed denial-of-service attacks.
  • Flexible Rule Management: Supports extensive customization for specific needs.
  • Geo-Blocking: Secures resources from threats originating in specific locations.
  • API Security: Offers robust protection for mobile applications.
  • Advanced Filtering: Shields against SQL and script injection threats.
What Benefits Should Be Evaluated in Reviews?
  • Enhanced Security: The ability to detect and neutralize latest attacks.
  • Efficient Customization: Tailoring security measures to fit organizational requirements.
  • Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications of security events for prompt action.
  • Cloud Deployment Flexibility: Compatibility with public and private cloud environments.

In finance, Reblaze addresses the stringent demands of data protection. E-commerce platforms benefit from its robust perimeter defenses against typical threats. Healthcare industries utilize its capabilities to secure sensitive patient data, leveraging both real-time monitoring and responsive alert systems to maintain compliance and integrity.

Link11
Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.
Sucuri Security
 

Sample Customers

eBay, AirAsia, Taboola, Reebonz, IAI, Payoneer, mySupermarket, William Hill, Fanduel
The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World
Buyer's Guide
Reblaze vs. Sucuri
June 2025
Free Report: Reblaze vs. Sucuri
Find out what your peers are saying about Reblaze vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Reblaze vs. Sucuri report.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.