"We had a nice experience with technical support."
"Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature."
"The technical support is quite good."
"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."
"One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic."
"The ease-of-use could be improved a little."
"Technical support needs some improvement."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Polarion ALM is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 14th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review. Polarion ALM is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "It incorporates almost all engineering tasks we need to do for one project". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". Polarion ALM is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, PTC Integrity, codeBeamer ALM and Atlassian ALM, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and Tricentis qTest.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
