Polarion ALM vs PractiTest comparison

Siemens and PractiTest are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Siemens is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while PractiTest is ranked #21. Siemens holds a 8.2% mindshare in ALM, compared to PractiTest’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Siemens users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

Polarion ALM

Read 22 Polarion ALM reviews

4,007 Views
3,646 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

434 Views
191 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Polarion ALM

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PractiTest and Polarion ALM compete in the Application Lifecycle Management category. PractiTest stands out in pricing and support, while Polarion ALM offers advanced features that justify its cost.

Features: PractiTest provides customizable dashboards, extensive integration capabilities, and a user-friendly interface. Polarion ALM includes comprehensive traceability, robust requirements management, and effective change management features.

Room for Improvement: PractiTest could enhance its documentation, expand its feature set, and improve its desktop capabilities. Polarion ALM can be complex for new users, may require extensive setup, and lacks some immediate deployment efficiencies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PractiTest delivers a cloud-based solution with flexible deployment and responsive service. Polarion ALM, mainly desktop-based, requires more setup but benefits from extensive documentation and support.

Pricing and ROI: PractiTest is cost-effective with quick ROI, appealing for budget-conscious buyers. Polarion ALM involves a higher initial investment but promises significant long-term ROI through its sophisticated capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Polarion ALM vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM vs. PractiTest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (6th)

PractiTest

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Polarion ALM is 8.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Dina Bindi

Information and Communication technology at CNH Industrial

Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility

It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.

Read full review

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool helped us to more effectively and efficiently gather and structure the information (requirements, test plans, project management data, etc.), and share it with the involved stakeholders in a safe and change-controlled manner."

"Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature."

"The software is stable."

"We had a nice experience with technical support."

"Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."

"The solution offers good integration."

"Scalability is good...The integration is quite good."

"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."

More Polarion ALM pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."

"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."

"Integration requires a lot of effort. You typically need to work with an implementation partner to get it done. Most connectors available for Polarion ALM are paid. Unlike other vendors offering several standard connectors for free, integrating third-party software with Polarion ALM involves discussing and coordinating with the third-party software providers, which requires effort."

"The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on."

"Technical support needs some improvement."

"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."

"Nowadays, the dashboard is too complex to be created."

More Polarion ALM cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is an expensive product."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Polarion ALM?

It is a very stable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates. Sometimes, database migrations take too long, spanning two...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

As a manual tester, I use Polarion ALM ( /products/polarion-alm-reviews ) for our weekly builds validation. These builds are crucial as they eventually lead to final release builds for customers. I...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 30% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 14% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM

Compared 8% of the time

PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM

Compared 6% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 33% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 29% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 23% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs PractiTest

Compared 16% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM

June 2025

Download Polarion ALM product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

July 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Overview

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Sample Customers

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM vs. PractiTest

July 2025

Free Report: Polarion ALM vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Polarion ALM vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Polarion ALM vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.