We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Polarion ALM vs PractiTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Polarion ALM Logo
3,754 views|2,483 comparisons
PractiTest Logo
854 views|709 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2022.
564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We had a nice experience with technical support.""Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature.""The technical support is quite good.""It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."

More Polarion ALM Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros →

Cons
"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job.""One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic.""The ease-of-use could be improved a little.""Technical support needs some improvement."

More Polarion ALM Cons →

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
  • "If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
  • "Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
  • More Polarion ALM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."
  • More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature.
    Top Answer: 
    Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion. Like… more »
    Top Answer: 
    One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic. There are third-party solutions that could be easily incorporated or built into the… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,754
    Comparisons
    2,483
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    918
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    854
    Comparisons
    709
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    739
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

    Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

    Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
    • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
    • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
    • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
    • Release your products with confidence and control.


    Offer
    Learn more about Polarion ALM
    Learn more about PractiTest
    Sample Customers
    Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
    Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise14%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2022.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Polarion ALM is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 14th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review. Polarion ALM is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "It incorporates almost all engineering tasks we need to do for one project". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat". Polarion ALM is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, PTC Integrity, codeBeamer ALM and Atlassian ALM, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Zephyr Enterprise, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and Tricentis qTest.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.