Pipedream vs webMethods.io comparison

Pipedream and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Pipedream is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Pipedream holds a 0.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pipedream users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Pipedream

Read 4 Pipedream reviews

155 Views
52 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

2,910 Views
2,086 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Pipedream

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WebMethods.io and Pipedream are competing in the integration platform category. WebMethods.io appears to have the upper hand in seamless integration and customer satisfaction, while Pipedream is favored for rapid deployment and development features.

Features: WebMethods.io offers robust integration capabilities with strong cloud connectivity and application integration, comprehensive connectors, advanced data mapping, and process automation across hybrid environments. Pipedream provides API-centric integration, powerful event-driven workflows, and a developer-friendly environment through code-level customization. It is flexible and caters to rapid prototyping and agile development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WebMethods.io features a straightforward deployment model supported by extensive documentation and support resources which streamline complex integrations. Its customer service provides detailed guidance and prompt resolution of technical queries. Pipedream benefits from swift deployment due to its lightweight, serverless architecture and offers community-driven support channels with collaborative knowledge sharing, though response times can vary compared to WebMethods.io.

Pricing and ROI: WebMethods.io has a higher initial setup cost but is balanced by strong ROI through comprehensive support and scalable solutions, catering to larger enterprises focused on long-term integration stability. Pipedream offers competitive pricing favored by start-ups and smaller companies preferring flexible, pay-as-you-go models. Its ROI is linked to speed and innovation, appealing to organizations prioritizing rapid deployment over extensive support infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Pipedream vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pipedream vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,852 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pipedream

Ranking in API Management

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Pipedream is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use

The UI and the fact that the product is not easy to use are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required. Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself. Pipedream is easy to use for someone with tech skills or someone new who is trying to learn how to code. Though it is user-friendly for people with tech skills, it is not at all user-friendly for people who do not have any tech skills. The user interface of Pipedream is very simple compared to the user interfaces of some other products like monday.com or Asana. Asana and monday.com have visually appealing user interfaces. The user interface of Pipedream is not visually appealing at all. The aforementioned details need to be considered for improvement in the solution. I just wish there was a little bit more documentation on how everything worked when it came to deployment since I was a fairly new employee at the company at that time. Sometimes, the workflow wouldn't work fine in Pipedream, and I had to check it myself for errors. Finding the errors in Pipedream is hard to find. I think it would be good if Pipedream had the ability to send an email to notify you that there is an error with the code instead of having to go back in and then look every day or every hour if there was an error in the code.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts."

"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding."

"The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."

"The solution enables users to integrate several things."

"What I like the most about the solution is that it comes with ready-made tools like handling security tokens and OAuth."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."

"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."

"A product with good API and EDI components."

"ActiveTransfer lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it. After that, we can remove the file to make sure that the reconciliation process is done. Sometimes we will zip and unzip the files, but if we have a GKB file, we often ignore it."

"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself."

"There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."

"We faced some server timeouts."

"They should give more information about trigger failure."

"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."

"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."

"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."

"In terms of improvements, maybe on the API monetization side, having users able to create separate consumption plans and throttle all those consumption plans towards the run time could be better."

"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, for a company, it is a nice product, but for personal use, it is not very beneficial."

"The product price is fair and inexpensive than one of the competitors."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"The product is expensive."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pipedream?

It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pipedream?

The product price is fair and inexpensive than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pipedream?

They could provide seamless integration with Jira, similar to classic code integration. Additionally, they should give more information about trigger failure.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft API Manager vs Pipedream

Compared 100% of the time

More Pipedream Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

May 2025

Download Pipedream product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

May 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Pipedream is an innovative workflow automation platform designed to streamline and simplify complex data integrations and workflows. Its primary use case is to connect various applications, services, and APIs, enabling seamless data transfer and automation across different systems.

The most valuable functionality of Pipedream is its ability to create and manage workflows using a visual interface. Users can easily build and customize workflows by connecting different actions and triggers, without the need for coding. Pipedream supports a wide range of triggers and actions, allowing users to automate tasks such as data extraction, transformation, and loading, as well as event-driven actions like sending notifications or updating databases.

Pipedream helps organizations by reducing manual effort and improving efficiency. It enables teams to automate repetitive tasks, freeing up valuable time and resources. With its extensive library of pre-built integrations and connectors, Pipedream simplifies the process of connecting and integrating various systems, eliminating the need for custom development. This empowers organizations to quickly build and deploy complex workflows, accelerating their digital transformation initiatives.

Furthermore, Pipedream provides real-time monitoring and debugging capabilities, allowing users to track the execution of workflows and troubleshoot any issues. It also offers advanced features like version control and collaboration, enabling teams to work together on building and maintaining workflows.

Pipedream

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Pipedream vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: Pipedream vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Pipedream vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

852,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pipedream vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.