Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Human Defense Platform vs R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Human Defense Platform
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Fraud Detection and Prevention (34th), Bot Management (8th)
R&S Web Application Firewal...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (41st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Human Defense Platform is designed for Fraud Detection and Prevention and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, down 1.1% compared to last year.
R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll), on the other hand, focuses on Web Application Firewall (WAF), holds 0.2% mindshare, down 0.3% since last year.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user785406 - PeerSpot reviewer
They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending
Primary use case of this solution is to detect fraud traffic (also mark the network which is sending the fraud traffic) and block the fraud traffic. These metrics help us to minimize wasted ad spend and provide our clients an extra layer of confidence around our campaigns As a result of the…
SS
Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available
The area that should be improved is licensing. When using an active/passive cluster, we have to pay 70% of the master appliance and license for the passive server that does not work. Since we know that only one server works at a time, we should pay only one license for the appliances and for the support as well. In my opinion, this has to be improved. If possible, the client software should be a web application instead of downloading software for the management. This can avoid login problems when they update or patch.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Retailer
13%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Can PerimeterX Bot Defender be deployed in a cloud environment, such as AWS or Azure?
The solution seamlessly integrates with Azure infrastructure, making it easy for users to protect their web applications from malicious bot traffic. The integration process is straightforward. By d...
Can PerimeterX Bot Defender handle bot attacks that utilize rotating IP addresses or proxies?
The solution employs device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis to accurately identify and block malicious bots, despite their IP address. With PerimeterX in place, users can successfully mitiga...
What are some of the ways that account fraud is committed and how can PerimeterX Bot Defender help us defend against that?
One of the significant concerns with account fraud is the creation of fake accounts using stolen personally identifiable information. With PerimeterX Bot Defender, users are able to identify and bl...
Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
 

Also Known As

PerimeterX Bot Defender, BotGuard for Applications, HUMAN MediaGuard
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

theTradeDesk
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.